| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/16/2007 06:35:19 PM · #1 |
Just spent a moment looking at old challenges and thought this was a big difference twix the overall and commenters vote...
Place: 10 out of 158
Avg (all users): 6.7293
Avg (commenters): 8.7778
Avg (camera): 6.7333
Avg (no camera): 6.0000
Views since voting: 2372
Views during voting: 401
Votes: 181
Comments: 28
Favorites: 4 (view)
Top 10 is a wonderfull result and was just wondering if peeps had a bigger difference with 10+ commenters?
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 06:39:47 PM · #2 |
Place: 243 out of 557
Avg (all users): 5.7133
Avg (commenters): 7.5000
Avg (camera): 5.7133
Avg (no camera): 0.0000
Views since voting: 16
Views during voting: 205
Votes: 150
Comments: 10
Favorites: 2 (view)
Place: 185 out of 373
Avg (all users): 5.5000
Avg (commenters): 7.2857
Avg (camera): 5.5000
Avg (no camera): 0.0000
Views since voting: 115
Views during voting: 260
Votes: 194
Comments: 9
Favorites: 0
 |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 06:59:11 PM · #3 |
It's been my experience that a lot of comments means either very good image, or very bad. I don't have scores on but I can pretty well judge how my image is doing just by the number of comments. My most recent was the "Bad" challenge which only got one comment, and that was on the last day. I had it pegged for mid to low 5's and that is just where it finished.
It's easier to comment on really bad images because there are obvious flaws to comment on. Really good photos get a lot of praise comments, but not much really useful from an improvement POV. The middle ones are harder (at least for me) because the difference between them and a really good image can be very subtle. Sometimes all I know is that it doesn't work - not really knowing what, exactly, to change. Plus I think a lot of people blow past the middle of the road ones pretty quickly - did it grab you or not? If yes, positively or negatively, comment. If no, vote 5(or 6 or 4) and move along. |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:10:05 PM · #4 |
Place: 86 out of 233
Avg (all users): 5.6548
Avg (commenters): 7.6667
Difference of 2.0119
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:13:15 PM · #5 |
Place: 220 out of 245
Avg (all users): 4.3962
Avg (commenters): 6.5000
difference 2.1038
Place: 22 out of 187
Avg (all users): 6.3738
Avg (commenters): 8.4615
differnece 2.0877
one high scoring one very low both over 2 difference
Message edited by author 2007-02-16 19:15:18. |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:25:41 PM · #6 |
Avg. (all users): 6.200
Avg. (commentors): 8.200 |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:34:32 PM · #7 |
Avg (all users): 6.5128
Avg (commenters): 8.5385
More than a two point difference. |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:40:15 PM · #8 |
Avg (all users): 5.3469
Avg (commenters): 7.7500
Comments: 10
Favorites: 1 (view)
2.4 difference.
I notice that where there's definite flaws that some are commenting on there's not as much difference. When it's a shot that just strikes a chord in a few, resulting in their saying so, that's where it has a big effect.
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:45:44 PM · #9 |
Avg (all users): 4.8725
Avg (commenters): 7.0000
A difference of 2.1275 |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 08:39:53 PM · #10 |
Ooh, I got a few contenders.
Score: 5.7708
Comments: 8.1538 (19 comments)
Difference: 2.383
Score: 5.8494
Comments: 8.1250 (14 comments)
Difference: 2.2756
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 08:52:24 PM · #11 |
No contest...
Score: 5.4211
Commenters: 8.2500
Difference: 2.829 |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 09:07:27 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
No contest...
Score: 5.4211
Commenters: 8.2500
Difference: 2.829 |
I did say 10 comments ;) Still, a masive swing.
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 09:32:35 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Ecce Signum:
I did say 10 comments... |
Oops! Alrighty then... 12 comments:
Score: 5.5783
Commenters: 8.0000
Difference: 2.4217
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 10:35:21 PM · #14 |
17 comments
Avg (commenters): 7.9167
Avg (all users): 5.3640
Difference: 2.55 and change |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 11:02:37 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
17 comments |
13 comments. 4 were after the voting, so those don't count in your avg.
Still... that's quite a difference! |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 11:08:26 PM · #16 |
19 comments
Avg (all users): 6.4658
Avg (commenters): 7.9091
difference: 1.4433
22 comments
Avg (all users): 6.1221
Avg (commenters): 7.6500
difference: 1.5321
22 comments
Avg (all users): 5.3569
Avg (commenters): 6.8500
difference: 1.4931
20 comments
Avg (all users): 5.3460
Avg (commenters): 7.3333
difference: 1.9873
11 comments
Avg (all users): 4.6269
Avg (commenters): 6.9167
difference: 2.2898
16 comments
Avg (all users): 5.9184
Avg (commenters): 7.8000
difference: 1.8816
and the winner is...
12 comments
Avg (all users): 5.7283
Avg (commenters): 8.6250
difference: 2.8967
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 11:31:30 PM · #17 |
Place: 198 out of 361
Avg (all users): 5.1957
Avg (commenters): 8.2500
Avg (camera): 5.2099
Avg (no camera): 4.3333
Differential between commenters and non-commenters - 3.1
Those that stopped to look actually saw the image - a reflection of a piano in the bell of another instrument. Those that didn't comment, just saw a peculiar abstract that looked 'noisy' - the noise was the texture of the instrument that was doing the reflecting.
I have learned - on DPC, you need to hit voters over the head sometimes.
Message edited by author 2007-02-16 23:48:22. |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 11:55:15 PM · #18 |
Didn't go through all but here is the big winner:
Differential 3.4046
:)
I have a bunch in the mi-2's as well
Lee
|
|
|
|
02/17/2007 12:02:36 AM · #19 |
Neither of you had enough comments.
I still win!
Where's my award?
|
|
|
|
02/17/2007 02:00:31 AM · #20 |
Avg (all users): 5.6605
Avg (commenters): 7.5294
Difference: 1.87
|
|
|
|
02/17/2007 02:11:25 AM · #21 |
Avg (all users): 5.6779
Avg (commenters): 7.9333
Comments: 21
Difference: 2.2554
ETA: 17 comments during the challenge.
Message edited by author 2007-02-17 02:14:15. |
|
|
|
02/17/2007 02:18:46 AM · #22 |
Avg (all users): 5.4976
Avg (commenters): 7.6471
This just happens to be my second fave shot of mine for all time.
|
|
|
|
02/17/2007 07:19:07 AM · #23 |
what an interesting re-visit...
this was surprising to me that this image had the highest differential for me--over 2.5
Avg (all users): 6.0123
Avg (commenters): 8.5385
equally surprising were the number of entries with 2.0+ differentials
Avg (all users): 5.4791
Avg (commenters): 7.6667
Avg (all users): 5.6949
Avg (commenters): 7.7500
Avg (all users): 6.2771
Avg (commenters): 8.2000
Avg (all users): 6.4036
Avg (commenters): 8.4000
although this is one of MANY with 1.5 pt differential or less, it does represent my highest score by commenters
Avg (all users): 7.5024
Avg (commenters): 9.1600
sometimes you connect, sometimes you don't. i agree with the point that you can pretty much gauge how you're doing in a challenge by the number of comments you get, but for me, it's that Avg (commenters) score that really lets me know how i did. |
|
|
|
02/17/2007 08:52:07 AM · #24 |
Avg (all users): 6.3319
Avg (commenters): 9.1111 |
|
|
|
02/17/2007 11:32:44 AM · #25 |
Avg (all users): 5.8258
Avg (commenters): 3.5000
Luckily, only 3 people commented. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 06:50:23 PM EDT.
