Image |
Comment |
| 01/17/2007 01:04:36 AM |
weeeee!by hobbes487Comment: I assume you held the camera at arm's length whilst spinning around? If so, I'm not sure that's really MP and it didn't really result in a particularly effective shot. The WB seems out and the face is lost against the backgound because of the soft focus. |
| 01/17/2007 01:02:04 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 01:01:11 AM |
Zoom zoomby DoubledizzleComment: Gives the impression of you having just raked back the zoom on your lens. But I'll work on the assumption you were on another bike or car following along behind, which I guess sort of qualifies as MP. |
| 01/17/2007 12:58:26 AM |
Freezingby ace flymanComment: The loooong light trails suggest that this isn't the best example of motion panning. Especially with the indistinct background/foreground. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 12:53:05 AM |
Wild rideby LevTComment: Cool enough shot, but I'm not sure it qualifies as MP IMO. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 12:51:24 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 12:49:42 AM |
60 mphby nzorroComment: Clever idea, but I'm not sure it qualifies as MP and I'm not a fan of the PP. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 12:48:18 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 12:47:20 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2007 12:46:17 AM |
high-speed callerby Len ScapComment: Pretty good MP shot, but you really hit the saturation and sharpening a little too hard in PP for my taste. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/11/2025 03:10:13 PM EDT.