| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
01/23/2007 04:32:17 PM |
| Interesting image, but it either looks like long or multiple exposures, not motion panning (the backround is light, but not exactly blurred). As an image (challenge aside), I like the color of the bicycle, but that seems to be the main focus. I can't find anything else to really focus on or that draws my eye; if something in the image had been the clear subject, it would have been easier for me to take, I think. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/22/2007 08:31:03 PM |
| Too much motion. The subject should be frozen. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/21/2007 03:09:44 PM |
| More long exposure than panning, nice image though. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 11:34:40 PM |
| I don't know if this is motion panning, but it's an electric, exciting shot. 7 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 11:32:44 PM |
| While it is a very effective photo, This is not panning |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 09:44:19 PM |
| interesting image, but i think somewhat missing the point of panning. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 02:35:26 PM |
| Everything is blurry, the subject is supposed to be in focus |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 01:32:54 AM |
| This would have worked well for a challenge named double exposure but in this challenge I expect to make out the subject better. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/19/2007 11:42:11 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 10:16:18 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 07:56:33 PM |
| Not quite there yet.... in my opinion, a successful motion panning photo has at least SOME of the subject in clear focus, whilst the background shows the tell-tale streaks. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 10:49:59 AM |
| The image's potential for impact is lost on the complete lack of stop motion. Too long an exposure gave the subject ample time to move and not be stopped in action. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 12:08:03 AM |
| Humm...not motion panning IMO. This is more like a long exposure or a slower shutter speed with a flash synced at the rear. Nice effort but better luck next time. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 10:50:24 PM |
| neat photo, not really motion panning though. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 10:07:13 PM |
| I really like this shot - many layers of movement - must have been tough to pan. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 04:43:34 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 01:51:00 PM |
| equal motion blur and motion panning I think. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 01:31:18 PM |
| not enough crispness to your subject. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 07:07:21 AM |
| i'm used to have smt sharpin the image - that is the reason for panning, isn't it? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 01:35:54 AM |
| Not really getting a feeling of panning in this shot. Motion blur yes. But not panning. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 01:02:04 AM |
| Seems to be more motion blur than motion panning. Sorry. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 01:39:49 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
