| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/17/2008 10:29:05 PM · #76 |
| Canon, liberal Democrat, Southwest (what is Texas? Itself?) |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:30:58 PM · #77 |
Originally posted by Jutilda:
Canon, liberal Democrat, Southwest (what is Texas? Itself?) |
Like a whole other country! ;-)
Canon, Democrat.
Shot Nikon when I was a working photog, Democrat then too.
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:32:47 PM · #78 |
Canon owner twice...Staunch Republican. 
Message edited by author 2008-03-17 22:33:30. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:36:52 PM · #79 |
Originally posted by ryand:
One of the main reasons that we went into Iraq was to free them from Saddam |
No, it wasn't.
Originally posted by ryand:
One of our goals of this war was to save lives. |
No, it wasn't.
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:46:27 PM · #80 |
| Shoot Canon, Usually vote Republican, but this year I might stay at home election night. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:47:48 PM · #81 |
Has anyone added up the scores in this thread yet? Or is anyone keeping track? Who's winning?
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:48:39 PM · #82 |
Originally posted by grigrigirl:
pinky show
I wonder if pinky used nikon or canon...hmmmm |
Holy cow (or cat)!!!! That is the one of the farthest left blah, blah, blah I have ever seen!!
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 10:50:24 PM · #83 |
Originally posted by jhonan:
Originally posted by ryand:
One of the main reasons that we went into Iraq was to free them from Saddam |
No, it wasn't.
Originally posted by ryand:
One of our goals of this war was to save lives. |
No, it wasn't. |
I disagree, enough said, lets not go in depth, neither of us will convince the other.
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:02:51 PM · #84 |
Originally posted by ryand:
Originally posted by jhonan:
Originally posted by ryand:
One of the main reasons that we went into Iraq was to free them from Saddam |
No, it wasn't.
Originally posted by ryand:
One of our goals of this war was to save lives. |
No, it wasn't. |
I disagree, enough said, lets not go in depth, neither of us will convince the other. |
Well, it is all public record. Removal of WMDs. Disruption of Al Qaeda support and training and that Iraq was an imminent threat to the US and US interests. I know it was almost 5 years ago now, (this week) but it isn't so hard to remember. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:06:32 PM · #85 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
Well, it is all public record. Removal of WMDs. Disruption of Al Qaeda support and training and that Iraq was an imminent threat to the US and US interests. I know it was almost 5 years ago now, (this week) but it isn't so hard to remember. |
Why were we so focused on getting Saddam then?
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:16:06 PM · #86 |
Originally posted by ryand:
Originally posted by Gordon:
Well, it is all public record. Removal of WMDs. Disruption of Al Qaeda support and training and that Iraq was an imminent threat to the US and US interests. I know it was almost 5 years ago now, (this week) but it isn't so hard to remember. |
Why were we so focused on getting Saddam then? |
The focus shifted towards 'getting Saddam' to prevent him or his associates from re-establishing a political or military foothold in Iraq, which would have caused a setback to US plans for the region. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:19:46 PM · #87 |
Canon-Moderate Republican
let's try not to wander away from the lighthearted original topic, please.
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:20:12 PM · #88 |
Originally posted by ryand:
Originally posted by Gordon:
Well, it is all public record. Removal of WMDs. Disruption of Al Qaeda support and training and that Iraq was an imminent threat to the US and US interests. I know it was almost 5 years ago now, (this week) but it isn't so hard to remember. |
Why were we so focused on getting Saddam then? |
Well. Once you don't find any substantive evidence of WMDs or an imminent threat and after 600,000 documents don't show any links to Al Qaeda, you've got to be doing it for some worthy cause, don't you ?
Okay, back on topic.
Blackberry - not allowed to vote. From a European perspective, fiscally conservative and socially liberal. Which doesn't appear to have an equivalent party in the US.
Message edited by author 2008-03-17 23:23:42. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:27:47 PM · #89 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
... fiscally conservative and socially liberal. Which doesn't appear to have an equivalent party in the US. |
Green Party might come close. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:31:09 PM · #90 |
Originally posted by ryand:
One of the main reasons that we went into Iraq was to free them from Saddam, who was killing millions of people. |
No, at the time we attacked he basically wasn't killing anybody. When he did commit atrocious acts -- like gassing thousands of Kurds in northern Iraq -- he did it with chemical weapons sold to him by the US and Europe. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:38:46 PM · #91 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by Gordon:
... fiscally conservative and socially liberal. Which doesn't appear to have an equivalent party in the US. |
Green Party might come close. |
just as well I'm not allowed to vote then. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:50:19 PM · #92 |
Nikon D3 - leftwing pinko commie
|
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:54:01 PM · #93 |
| Canon Shooter, die hard Repulican. Go McCain or Bush for another 8 years. |
|
|
|
03/17/2008 11:54:40 PM · #94 |
| Republican and Nikon fits me well. |
|
|
|
03/18/2008 12:15:52 AM · #95 |
| liberal nikonian with a HD canon video cam... |
|
|
|
03/18/2008 01:32:58 AM · #96 |
| Canon shooter, Republican voter (almost always) |
|
|
|
03/18/2008 02:15:02 AM · #97 |
Originally posted by banmorn:
Nikonian Democrat |
Nikonian Republican here; right on with your little poll stats.
|
|
|
|
03/18/2008 02:35:30 AM · #98 |
| Nikon w/ 2 Sony camcorders, but if Hillary, or Obama get in, or God help us both (are we still allowed to say God?), I won't be able to afford the time to take pictures in the new socialist republic of tax me freely. |
|
|
|
03/18/2008 03:05:07 AM · #99 |
*Squawk* Fox news/Rush/Oriely says "new socialist republic of tax me freely" *Squawk*
Said the parrot
Arguing Democrat or republican is like fighting over coke and pepsi, at the end of the day they are both cola
Hell this thread is a great example
Nikon or Cannon
Both good Cameras, I would shoot the same with either one, who cares
Pepsi or Coke
Both Colas, both bad for you, who cares
Democrat or Republican
Politicians, doesn't matter, both full of crap with hidden agendas
Message edited by author 2008-03-18 03:18:07. |
|
|
|
03/18/2008 04:28:52 AM · #100 |
Canon and would definitely vote Democrat if I wasn't British ;)
Message edited by author 2008-03-18 04:29:14. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 09:18:51 PM EDT.
