| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/13/2006 03:01:27 AM · #51 |
the original challenge was Duotones II
Original submission: 
Revised for this challenge: 
Thanks for all the nice comments. The re-done preprocessed flower looks like this:  |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 03:08:38 AM · #52 |
really pants:
ever so slightly less pants:
a marked improvement of 0.3; woo! (and indeed) hoo!
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 04:07:21 AM · #53 |
I wanted to see what I could do with my DSLR
 
Take one (7.121) ................Take Two (6.444)
a drop 0f 0.677. That was GBP1000 well spent ;)
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 04:20:27 AM · #54 |
 6.044  6.444
I took a past entry from the Something Old II challenge, an image that many liked but said they would have liked it better if I removed two buckets and a blue object at the bottom. I did just that.
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 04:33:32 AM · #55 |
Original 5.196 Triangle just under a year ago
 second attempt 5.284
Not a huge jump in score and a huge drop in % but I am really pleased to see the difference and see how much I have learned in the time I have been on DPC.
:)
P
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 05:03:27 AM · #56 |
 5.837
 5.969
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 05:12:32 AM · #57 |
 
              5.962                             6.482
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 05:34:34 AM · #58 |
Well, at least I improved my score by more than a point. Also position is better, but it was a risk, since the subject ordinarily doesn't do well with dp anyway. Here are the two images. Both are titled Shadow Play, and the original was in the Long Exposure Challenge. Why I chose this one is because I did get a few favorites from the original, and also most commentators indicated it could be improved, but nobody said that the subject was bad, so I assumed it was a good subject. Wrong again.
Message edited by author 2006-06-13 05:35:43. |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 05:39:50 AM · #59 |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 06:18:04 AM · #60 |
 original  take two |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 06:56:22 AM · #61 |
dup :(
Message edited by author 2006-06-13 07:01:27. |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:00:54 AM · #62 |
Originally posted by ralphnev:
4.973  6.631 |
I knew the first pic sucked, 1.66 diff ...
the real diff was the flash -
first was ab400 has a flash duration of 4ms
the second was the sb80dx at 1/128 power has a flash duration of 140us
delay was 4ms
if i find time i'll post the out takes ...
Message edited by author 2006-06-13 07:05:17. |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:02:20 AM · #63 |
New one: 
Old one: 
i added cards and stacked the chips. i scored better this time. a bit. my husband had a HUGE improvement in his score so that made me less happy with my little improvement. ya know, jealousy and all. lol ;) |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:04:51 AM · #64 |
new: old:
I prefer the old as it has more personality.
Improvement in score? about +1.3
My husband was right - just add water drops. ;) |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:11:39 AM · #65 |
 Original 4.568
 Take Two 5.447
The Jeep sold at auction June 3 , $ 4400.00[img]
They used one of the out takes for the adv. only in B/W
 |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:19:43 AM · #66 |
 Original 5.087 (40%)  Take II 5.873 (51%)
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:23:52 AM · #67 |
mine did worse :)
  |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:27:45 AM · #68 |
Original........................Take 2
 
Score: 5.118 ......................... 5.610
An improvement of only .5, but enough to make it a personal best! :)
Edit:
This was a great challenge. Maybe this should be done annually?
Message edited by author 2006-06-13 07:32:42.
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:27:59 AM · #69 |
 original  DQed - I added words like the original. O well. |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 07:43:32 AM · #70 |
original:
and the redo:
Better by half a point... Sincere thanks to the commenters in both challenges. |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 08:04:59 AM · #71 |
First Take:
 (6.158)
Take Two:
 (6.488)
Message edited by author 2006-06-13 08:06:22.
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 08:23:11 AM · #72 |
 5.523
Redo:
 5.494
Both mediocre. |
|
|
|
06/13/2006 08:52:52 AM · #73 |
Seems like plain old courtesy to link to the original image if that's the point of the challenge. It has nothing to do with intelligence. I tried to post a link in my comments section and I couldn't get it to work. Now, THAT is dumb. :)
This is my original:
 4.72
and this is my "improvement":
 4.296
I tried making the subject bigger and fixing the white balance. I even applied some "grunge" to the background. This is what I learned at DPC. To be honest, I think I like the original better, too...
By the way, thanks to Judi and Rikki for arguing with me. I woke up this morning with several new comments and favorites! :)
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 08:55:14 AM · #74 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Seems like plain old courtesy to link to the original image if that's the point of the challenge. It has nothing to do with intelligence. I tried to post a link in my comments section and I couldn't get it to work. Now, THAT is dumb. :)
This is my original:
4.72
and this is my "improvement":
4.296
I tried making the subject bigger and fixing the white balance. I even applied some "grunge" to the background. This is what I learned at DPC. To be honest, I think I like the original better, too...
By the way, thanks to Judi and Rikki for arguing with me. I woke up this morning with several new comments and favorites! :) |
Hehehehe...well I am glad some good came out of it. All smiles...!!
|
|
|
|
06/13/2006 09:02:17 AM · #75 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Hehehehe...well I am glad some good came out of it. All smiles...!! |
btw, Judi, I just wanted to say that even though you clearly know what you're doing, garnering a higher score for your new shot, that I actually like your original better. It conveys the point of old vs. new (I didn't even make the connection on the take 2 shot) and has a certain poignance to it, whereas the new one just has the visual interest of the hand position. I'd say it was more like a fashion shot. But that's what you get for trying to fix something that ain't broke! ;)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 12:46:32 AM EDT.
Original 4.568
Take Two 5.447
