Image |
Comment |
| 01/01/2010 03:01:13 PM |
by MephistoComment: Very interesting and somewhat unconventional portrait. I really like the vertical and horizontal lines. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 02:59:41 PM |
could not ask for moreby photokariangelComment: Focus, lighting, composition, border - all work really well here. Nice to see a wide angle lens getting some portrait use.
Great stuff. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 04:51:36 AM |
flight from dark yearsby cutoutComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: Wonderful grain, colours and patterns. I really like the way it fades to black at much of the margin. I really like the sense of blur too - the way this increases in proportion to the distance from the sharpest point of the image suggests a Lensbaby to me. Most people (including me) wouldn't know how to begin to get an image this effective from this scene.
Critical stuff: Nothing at all.
Overall: A very effective image - masterfully executed. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 04:43:19 AM |
Mirror Mirror on the Mallby DistantColoursComment: Ahh... The Bullring in Birmingham (Selfridges behind you) - you were lucky to not be stopped, I was told I needed to pay £150 for a permit to shoot inside when a security guard tackled me.
It is an effective image though. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 04:40:04 AM |
The Elephant in the Roomby RKTComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: Great silhouettes and I really like the curtain detail too. My favourite part is the horizontal lines of the partially pulled blind behind the curtain.
Critical stuff: The blurry edge of the cat - it shouldn't bother me, there is plenty of sharp areas for the eye to rest upon, but it really does; almost suggestive of a Lensbaby but not quite enough blur for that - it frustrates rather than pleases the eye.
Overall: A nicely crafted image with a number of compelling elements. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 04:34:26 AM |
blanketedby krnodilComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: Very bold image - very brave to offer this up. I do see the in focus snow top middle of the image and in many ways it is the primer for the image. The overall effect works for me, it communicates the sense of 'blanketing' your title suggests and captures this in a way that an 'in focus' shot would not have. It isn't about the man or the trees or the house, it's about the snow and how it changes things.
Critical stuff: The shallow diagonal at the bottom of the image - although i perhaps adds information about the POV / vantage point, I think it does detract - a tighter crop may have been better.
Overall: A brave image which will probably get hammered. I find it rather effective. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 04:28:18 AM |
Life After Holloweenby Car54Comment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: I really do think this a scene worthy of capture, I also like where you have placed the intersecting straight lines....
Critical stuff: This comes across as a low quality image - I'm a fan of grain and of the use of blur but here there seems to be be little artistic intent; that is a little strange because the scene and the composition has it by the bucket load. I either feel cheated or taunted. I get the feeling that you could've made much more of this image but you have deliberately decided to withhold any beauty at all.
Overall: A frustrating image for me - if that was your intention, to communicate something that was devoid of beauty (spent perhaps?) then you have succeeded. I feel a little played - perhaps that's a good thing. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 04:03:20 AM |
The Forest of Hopelessby posthumousComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: Well, the image does communicate a sense of foreboding and the difference in the lighting of the branches offers the viewer an interesting pattern - almost like a lightening storm.
Critical stuff: The level of intrinsic interest in this scene is pretty low and I'm not sure that whatever choices you made in post-processing was ever going to overcome that. The main issue for me is how flat the image looks - perhaps you have tried to eliminate a sense of depth with your edit; if that is the case, perhaps a different title such as 'The impenetrable Forest' may have communicated the wall like nature of the scene a little better.
Overall: A difficult image to like, though the pattern of the branches is interesting, there is little else in the scene to hold a viewers interest. The good pattern might make this an excellent candidate for an overlay texture but as a standalone image it's not one I warm to. Apologies. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 03:54:22 AM |
2:58by Covert_OddityComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives:This image has a crafted feel about - the care you have taken to offer the right POV is very evident. The position of the vanishing point, the right exposure time to give the 'right' amount of blur, the clarity of the clock - all very well crafted. The monochrome presentation is absolutely the right choice here too.
Critical stuff: The post processing is (I feel) a little heavy handed - perhaps it is just over-sharpened, but I think it isn't as simple as that, is it tone mapped? Whatever you have done, I like it in places - the brick on the left and the textured paving close to the track but I think it works less well on the ceiling, on the bricked flooring to the left of the pillars and on the window at the extreme left side of the image. It does depend on the software you have but there are a number of ways you could have been more selective in applying textural enhancement.
Overall: A VERY nice image, but one that (for me) doesn't make the most of the excellent composition you have crafted - over-sharpened areas distract the eye away from those leading lines you have so carefully built. Still a 7 from me, but I think there is more to be had from this capture. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2010 03:42:02 AM |
Edelweiss Galleryby beekeeperComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives:There are some really excellent elements to this image - the clarity of the front of the building, the dynamic nature of the snow and the rather ethereal coloration. This is definitely a scene worth capturing.
Critical stuff: I think this is one of those 'nearly' images, where there are a number of elements that are nearly there but not quite - they become more conspicuous as a result. For me your handling of red is a little underdone - the ribbon on the tree is a wonderful element which could have been enhanced. The foreground snow is a little distracting because it is out of focus - perhaps a vignette (to white) may have helped here? I also think that given the prominence of the lamppost on the right, getting it truly vertical is almost mandatory.
Overall: A nice image which communicates the feeling of the moment but with a few visual niggles which conspire to frustrate rather than delight the viewer. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 10:58:57 AM EDT.