Author | Thread |
|
11/24/2004 09:51:14 AM · #26 |
Funny. I saw it right away.
But. Now about me,me,me
Here's a colorized version of one of my outtakes. The originals are pretty much straight b/w even if they were taken in color. I added grain because it is a classic treatment for paper shots. I was influenced by Barry Whitehall's ribbon and paper pictures. Mine aren't as eyepopping as his and I did give it my own spin, I think.
 |
|
|
11/24/2004 10:25:57 AM · #27 |
Originally posted by saintaugust: isn't the original, untouched file supposed to be b/w? |
Some cameras (including mine) don't have a B&W mode. All digicams shoot in color anyway. It's just a matter of whether the B&W conversion in handled in the camera or in software. |
|
|
11/24/2004 10:35:59 AM · #28 |
Submission was "as composed in camera" (uncropped from original frame) but converted to B&W:
This one was made for B&W! I think it's much better than the color version, don't you. Of course, it didn't show that in it's 126 place finish, but that's par for the course for me. ;)
Here's my also-uncropped second alternate (let me know what ya think):
 |
|
|
11/24/2004 10:38:40 AM · #29 |

Message edited by author 2004-11-24 15:14:37.
|
|
|
11/24/2004 10:45:11 AM · #30 |

I think i like the B&W better |
|
|
11/24/2004 10:50:21 AM · #31 |
It never ceases to amaze me how removing the color can add so much to an image. I've seen and taken many in color that I thought were great but when converted became amazing. Good job to all who submitted. |
|
|
11/24/2004 10:58:55 AM · #32 |
Cropped a little tighter as suggested in some of the comments. Thank you for the comments
 |
|
|
11/24/2004 11:22:02 AM · #33 |
I think I like the B&W better.
Converted to B&W using channel mixer:
red +10
green +80
blue +10
contrast -4
brightness-contrast adjustment layer: contast +10; brightness +10
reduced size, unsharp mask 80-1-4
I really wanted to submit one of my b&w cat -- but I chickened out because of all the cat haters. I know there are flower haters, too, especfially when they're macros, but I thought it stood a better chance. Hey, BradP liked it -- who cares what anybody else thinks :)
Really, every single comment was valued. I've gotten where I look at the number of comments before I look at the score when I update. I have learned so much from those who have taken the time to comment. :D
 |
|
|
11/24/2004 11:22:36 AM · #34 |
|
|
11/24/2004 11:24:17 AM · #35 |
Originally posted by Zoomdak:  |
WOW! I can't decide which one I like better! |
|
|
11/24/2004 11:25:55 AM · #36 |
Originally posted by Zoomdak:  |
i could easily recognize who took the photograph during the challenge...it has become ur trade mark in a way...congrats on 4th place |
|
|
11/24/2004 11:33:10 AM · #37 |
|
|
11/24/2004 12:15:35 PM · #38 |
Slightly different view - same shot.
 |
|
|
11/24/2004 12:15:36 PM · #39 |
::  |
|
|
11/24/2004 12:20:27 PM · #40 |
I used the channel mixer on 100% blue to convert to b/w, and I went with the really tight crop to emphasize the hair plug holes.
Message edited by author 2004-11-24 12:31:18.
|
|
|
11/24/2004 12:24:38 PM · #41 |
Here's my original
And my entry
Can't quite remember what I did, converted to grayscale, levels, curves, saturation and contrast, I think. Oh, I added grain, I think it really brought out the details of the walls |
|
|
11/24/2004 12:36:23 PM · #42 |
Here are mine:
B&W
Original
The original has had no editing except for resizing for DPC.
No cropping was necessary for this shot.
Not much difference - except for his eyes and the background.
Message edited by author 2004-11-24 12:37:30.
|
|
|
11/24/2004 12:58:47 PM · #43 |
Here are mine:

|
|
|
11/24/2004 01:14:28 PM · #44 |
|
|
11/24/2004 01:37:22 PM · #45 |
No crop, although I probably should have trimmed the left side of the frame a bit.
Used levels to darken the background and highlight the sun filtering through the grass.
Basic channel mixer conversion to monochrome.
Resized.
Unsharp Mask.
|
|
|
11/24/2004 02:04:10 PM · #46 |
This is the crop that I had originally wanted to submit but I figured I would get nailed big-time for the blown-out sky. I ended up submitting a square crop and got nailed for the foreground, not that I was surprised by that. What do you think?

|
|
|
11/24/2004 02:13:50 PM · #47 |
|
|
11/24/2004 02:35:58 PM · #48 |
I never took a color photo of my entry:
I was testing the 20D B&W feature, so I was just experimenting.
Here is a similar shot in color:
<>
Message edited by author 2004-11-27 10:27:37. |
|
|
11/24/2004 03:01:27 PM · #49 |
I would have preferred color on mine:
 |
|
|
11/24/2004 03:19:24 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by alansfreed: I would have preferred color on mine: |
Your B & W was one of my 9's and after looking at the color version, I have to say the B&W is my favorite.
There is a "softer & nicer" feel to the B & W. Maybe due to color actually being a distraction in a way, and in your B & W, my eyes seem to be naturally drawn to hers, without distraction.
Great portrait!
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/17/2025 04:51:11 PM EDT.