| Image |
Comment |
| 03/07/2005 02:51:39 AM |
a photograph is made, not taken.by fstopopenComment: This is a strong and eerie image, but it's really hard to figure out what's happening under that arch. Almost has an underwater feel. Much study leads me to believe that's a landscape of hills and trees under there, but I have to reach roo deep for it. If you had worked to separate the distant landscape from both the sky and the foreground rocks, by lightening it and adding contrast at same time in that area, this would be much more coherent. As it is, ALL the elements of the photo are so close in value that it's hard to perceive the depth that is obviously there. Also, the truncation of the arch at the top is most unfortunate... Still, a strong and evocative image. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:47:53 AM |
Mendocino Coastby bryanbrazilComment: A little too contrasty, it cries out for more detailin the major dark areas, especially where the bridge footing are lost in the shadows. Nicely composed, except that the rocks on the lft are so flatly-lit and detailed that they are distracting. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:46:04 AM |
Railway Bridgeby shutterphunkComment: I really, really wisdh this had been rotated ccw a degree or so, it has such a strong sense of leaning over. The tonalities are a bit muted, but it's an effective composition and a drmamtic scene. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:44:28 AM |
Looking thruby NunoComment: This is remarkably nice, and a brave entry given the topic. The image looks very much like something AA would have done. It is unfortunate that the face is not in focus. A strong entry in my eyes, nevertheless. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:42:59 AM |
Riding the Waves by mocabelaComment: Very rich, compositionally a bit pat. There's essentially nothing happening in the bottom half of the picture. The rendring of the rocks is exquiste, and you have dealt very well with the backlit sky. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:40:46 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:39:52 AM |
Daffodils, Washington Stateby jbsmithanaComment: About as pure an Ansel as we have in this challenge. Wonderful sky work. The bit of tee on the right is a definite negative. Very strong entry. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:38:42 AM |
A Tribute to the Legend 1902-1984by GringoComment: The composition is a little too centered, and you're about one zone shy of true "pop" here, but there's much to like in this image. Good score from me. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:37:12 AM |
Church, Watkins Coloradoby MWittComment: The tonal range and the treatment of the skyhere are uber-ansel, congratulations. The composition itself, with the lack of breathing room on all sides, is distinctly lackluster. In particular, we really need more foreground, quite a bit more. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/07/2005 02:35:28 AM |
We Built This Cityby casualguyComment: This could be SO nice, but there's alittle too much sky with nothing happening; a full third of the image is empty space. And the critical dark areas, on the shaded sides of the cars, are crying out for a little detail in the shadow. Otherwise the tonalities are rich & palpable. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/16/2025 07:27:03 AM EST.