| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/09/2009 01:26:29 AM · #26 |
| 6.3 so farrrr yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 01:32:20 AM · #27 |
It's doing better than expected. I got a couple of 8's. I got a comment about it not being like the original. I don't want to go into detail to keep anonymity, but my purpose was to improve the original, not duplicate it. I think for this re-do type challenge we need a rule about consistently identifying the original from the title, not just in the details.
Votes: 10
Views: 19
Avg Vote: 6.0000
Comments: 1 |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 01:34:02 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by boyd2000:
It's doing better than expected. I got a couple of 8's. I got a comment about it not being like the original. I don't want to go into detail to keep anonymity, but my purpose was to improve the original, not duplicate it. I think for this re-do type challenge we need a rule about consistently identifying the original from the title, not just in the details.
Votes: 10
Views: 19
Avg Vote: 6.0000
Comments: 1 |
As far as I am aware the whole purpose of this challenge was to improve a brown ribbon winner...not copy it.
|
|
|
|
02/09/2009 01:34:13 AM · #29 |
I used a title that was close enough to the original that a quick search will find it. Looks liek thelow voters took their toys and went home. Getting some votes in the anticipated range now.
Votes: 8
Views: 16
Avg Vote: 4.6250
Comments: 0 |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 01:35:21 AM · #30 |
6.5556 wooo!!!!!! now everyone...STOP VOTING :]
haha |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 01:53:11 AM · #31 |
Votes: 9
Views: 23
Avg Vote: 6.4444
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 02/09/09 01:51 am
I actually thought this shot was better...
|
|
|
|
02/09/2009 02:06:15 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by zackdezon:
Votes: 9
Views: 23
Avg Vote: 6.4444
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 02/09/09 01:51 am
I actually thought this shot was better... |
That's just shy of my highest scores! Especially considering the harsh voting going around, that's darn good. Pass a few tips this way please. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 02:09:54 AM · #33 |
Haha I know it's bad of me to say that, I just really REALLY like my entry. Way more than any of the things I've gotten higher scores on. And in a way I thought DPC would appreciate.
|
|
|
|
02/09/2009 02:21:07 AM · #34 |
Votes: 11
Views: 27
Avg Vote: 5.9091
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Go. Up. Please.
p.s. I hope that people when voting are paying attention to if the shot is actually based off of a brown ribbon. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 02:28:51 AM · #35 |
So good so far, of course I'm bound to drop now...
Votes: 10
Views: 22
Avg Vote: 6.7000
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 02/09/09 02:21 am
Message edited by author 2009-02-09 02:48:14. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 02:45:23 AM · #36 |
Votes: 12
Views: 20
Avg Vote: 6.3333
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 02/09/09 02:43 am |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 03:47:38 AM · #37 |
Votes: 16
Views: 34
Avg Vote: 7.7500
Comments: 6
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
I'm in shock! :) |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 03:49:36 AM · #38 |
Originally posted by halopes:
Votes: 16
Views: 34
Avg Vote: 7.7500
Comments: 6
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
I'm in shock! :) |
WOW! Good luck with it mate. :) |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 05:35:14 AM · #39 |
Originally posted by halopes:
Votes: 16
Views: 34
Avg Vote: 7.7500
Comments: 6
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
I'm in shock! :) |
With that score after a reasonable sample of 16 and a favourite already - I can't see you not ribboning. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 06:14:24 AM · #40 |
My score so far.
Brown Ribbon Deja Vu II
Votes: 20
Views: 39
Avg Vote: 5.5500
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 02/09/09 06:15 am
Message edited by author 2009-02-09 06:33:14. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 06:20:33 AM · #41 |
I might have the brown in this one! I wasn't going for it but I'll wear the ribbon with honor!
Votes: 18
Views: 32
Avg Vote: 4.7778
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0 |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 06:33:22 AM · #42 |
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred
|
|
|
|
02/09/2009 06:39:41 AM · #43 |
Originally posted by ThingFish:
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred |
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 06:45:41 AM · #44 |
Votes: 22
Views: 45
Avg Vote: 5.6818
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0 |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 06:56:01 AM · #45 |
Originally posted by HawkeyeLonewolf:
Originally posted by ThingFish:
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred |
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title. |
Yes unfortunately that is so. Bad luck. I found that pretty dumb as well and dont know what good that is. After all I want to be able to compare during voting and not after. So for those that thought a bit further and realized this and put a link to the original in their title it will be beneficial as far as my vote is concerned.
That's what this challenge is all about. Improving on a BROWN. If you cant see the BROWN you cant compare and thus the image is meaningless in that context.
Message edited by author 2009-02-09 07:02:17. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 07:00:49 AM · #46 |
Votes: 20
Views: 39
Avg Vote: 6.8000
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 02/09/09 07:00 am |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 07:11:23 AM · #47 |
Originally posted by ThingFish:
Originally posted by HawkeyeLonewolf:
Originally posted by ThingFish:
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred |
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title. |
Yes unfortunately that is so. Bad luck. I found that pretty dumb as well and dont know what good that is. After all I want to be able to compare during voting and not after. So for those that thought a bit further and realized this and put a link to the original in their title it will be beneficial as far as my vote is concerned.
That's what this challenge is all about. Improving on a BROWN. If you cant see the BROWN you cant compare and thus the image is meaningless in that context. |
I agree with ThingFish. After carefully reviewing each entry, I found that about 80% provided a convenient way to look up the homage Brown image. That was a lot of fun. Those who missed the technique used in the previous Brown challenge created a great amount of frustration. |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 07:25:25 AM · #48 |
Votes: 20
Views: 30
Avg Vote: 4.0000
Comments: 1
but i have risen from 3.3333 |
|
|
|
02/09/2009 07:30:55 AM · #49 |
Originally posted by hahn23:
Originally posted by ThingFish:
Originally posted by HawkeyeLonewolf:
Originally posted by ThingFish:
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred |
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title. |
Yes unfortunately that is so. Bad luck. I found that pretty dumb as well and dont know what good that is. After all I want to be able to compare during voting and not after. So for those that thought a bit further and realized this and put a link to the original in their title it will be beneficial as far as my vote is concerned.
That's what this challenge is all about. Improving on a BROWN. If you cant see the BROWN you cant compare and thus the image is meaningless in that context. |
I agree with ThingFish. After carefully reviewing each entry, I found that about 80% provided a convenient way to look up the homage Brown image. That was a lot of fun. Those who missed the technique used in the previous Brown challenge created a great amount of frustration. |
Ho-hum...I am frustrating....!!! Not the first time I have heard that!!! LOL!
|
|
|
|
02/09/2009 07:31:05 AM · #50 |
This is a pleasant surprise:
Votes: 21
Views: 36
Avg Vote: 6.3810
Comments: 1
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/17/2025 01:34:58 PM EDT.
