| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/01/2009 01:36:11 AM · #1 |
Descent from the Cross
by:  De Sousa
Congratulations to De Sousa and thanks for everyone that participated in the 2008 Peoples Choice Photography Awards.
Congratulations to the following photographs that were nominated. Listed in numerical order.
    
    
    
    
   
    
    
    
    
Message edited by author 2009-02-02 00:49:28. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 01:46:17 AM · #2 |
Great Idea! Congrats to Jorge.
Scott what was the rest of top 5 or 10 by vote?
It is a very nice collection of images.
|
|
|
|
02/01/2009 01:56:59 AM · #3 |
2nd Place (Tie)
3rd Place
4th Place (Tie)
Message edited by author 2009-02-01 01:57:17. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 01:59:17 AM · #4 |
Hey congrats Jorge.....What a great range of images....but why is the HDC mask over one of those images?
|
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:01:19 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Hey congrats Jorge.....What a great range of images....but why is the HDC mask over one of those images? |
I was thinking the same thing. They must have put it under the nude category and changed it later. I think if you do that it will continue to have the HDC mask. I may be wrong but I think I remember someone mention that in the threads a while back. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:06:05 AM · #6 |
| Well deserved! And I agree about the range of images, fantastic. Thanks for doing this Scott. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:23:30 AM · #7 |
I don't have the nudity blocked on my options and yet that mask still shows!
Is this a new ruling....to hide it from everyone because nudity is so hideous?
|
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:28:41 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Judi:
I don't have the nudity blocked on my options and yet that mask still shows!
Is this a new ruling....to hide it from everyone because nudity is so hideous? |
I don't know the reasoning behind the block. I can understand the cover over the first one, not because of the nudity, I find it tasteful and art, but to keep it work safe and I'm guessing that is why DPC places the cover. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:32:24 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by SDW:
Originally posted by Judi:
I don't have the nudity blocked on my options and yet that mask still shows!
Is this a new ruling....to hide it from everyone because nudity is so hideous? |
I don't know the reasoning behind the block. I can understand the cover over the first one, not because of the nudity, I find it tasteful and art, but to keep it work safe and I'm guessing that is why DPC places the cover. |
I give up...the rulings on this site are becoming ridiculous...I am seriously wondering why I stay on this site....but that isn't what this thread is about. There are some awesome photographers on here...and I am glad to see them getting some recognition in things like this. You have done a fantastic job Scott...my hat off to you.
|
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:38:38 AM · #10 |
| I don't have nudity blocked either but the photos are hidden .. what the heck?? More so there is a little girl in there with a bathing suit on (covering everything, very modest) and it's blocked! WTF??? |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 03:07:05 AM · #11 |
Thanks, Scott! And thanks to whoever submitted a few of mine - I'm VERY honored and flattered!!
I also like how the selection shows a wonderful diversity of styles and subjects. Really a nice showcase of work from folks here! |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 03:10:25 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Katmystiry:
I don't have nudity blocked either but the photos are hidden .. what the heck?? More so there is a little girl in there with a bathing suit on (covering everything, very modest) and it's blocked! WTF??? |
i didnt even know it was a bathing suit:/ |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 11:05:25 AM · #13 |
Congrats to the winner (although I wouldn't have picked it ;D).
Congrats to everyone else for being nominated! Some great work in there.
As for the nudity filter, I think that might be part of all the moving around and stuff they are doing right now getting the site ready for whatever it is they are getting the site ready for.
I wouldn't make too much out of it until some official word gets handed down. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 11:21:09 AM · #14 |
Congrats Jorge! That fits perfectly with my all-time favorite of his,  .
Congrats to the other nominees as well. I was thrilled too to be included in that list :) |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 11:26:01 AM · #15 |
Wow, I feel so honored to be up on the nominations at all!! Thanks!
And congrats Jorge!
Message edited by author 2009-02-01 11:26:52. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 12:34:09 PM · #16 |
The reason they are not showing is because the link SDW used in his post labels the image as hidden.
If you use just image id #, they show up fine.
|
|
|
|
02/01/2009 12:40:55 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by jeger:
The reason they are not showing is because the link SDW used in his post labels the image as hidden.
If you use just image id #, they show up fine. |
That still doesn't explain why even if they're under the hidden label, those of us that have opted out of the filter still see them filtered. We shouldn't. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 12:49:17 PM · #18 |
congrats jorge, it's without a doubt the most labourintensiv and elaborate photograph of the year!
and thanks to everyone who voted mine for 4th, i feel really honoured!
|
|
|
|
02/01/2009 01:38:33 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by jeger:
The reason they are not showing is because the link SDW used in his post labels the image as hidden.
If you use just image id #, they show up fine. |
That still doesn't explain why even if they're under the hidden label, those of us that have opted out of the filter still see them filtered. We shouldn't. |
I have no idea. Maybe send a ticket to Langdon -- it could be a bug left over from recent moves.
There are no new rules, ridiculous or otherwise, that would cause this. I suspect it is just something buggy in the site. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:29:44 PM · #20 |
| Those are some awesome photographs, well done for organising this Scott ... and to see one of my shots nominated is so cool :) |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:46:04 PM · #21 |
This sort of puts to rest the notion that only "eye candy" images are appreciated by the DPC masses. I notice that many of these are photos that do not fall into that category (including the one that I nominated).
DPC, you make me proud. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:47:47 PM · #22 |
| Congratulations Jorge on your win that is well deserved choice. I missed this post not sure how I guess I need to start paying more attention. Thanks for the nomination I feel really honoured. :) |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:49:36 PM · #23 |
Originally posted by BAMartin:
This sort of puts to rest the notion that only "eye candy" images are appreciated by the DPC masses. I notice that many of these are photos that do not fall into that category (including the one that I nominated).
DPC, you make me proud. |
Ain't that the truth! Check out each image's thread, and you can see that most of them were recognized by one or more awards in the Posthumous thread. Way cool. |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 02:53:36 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by Katmystiry:
I don't have nudity blocked either but the photos are hidden .. what the heck?? More so there is a little girl in there with a bathing suit on (covering everything, very modest) and it's blocked! WTF??? |
Yep...she is in bathing suit. I am not sure why the "hidden due to content" is there. Maybe someday it can be removed. I am honored to have my image amongst the many great images. On a side note, I don't see the image that I nominated? Maybe I did it wrong? |
|
|
|
02/01/2009 03:13:56 PM · #25 |
I'm curious. Who got to choose the winner? Was there a vote, or was it simply based on the number of nominations each photo received?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 07:00:52 PM EDT.
