Oct. Side Challenge, Macro for the time challenged

	You are not logged in. (log in or register)

DPChallenge Forums >> Side Challenges and Tournaments >> Oct. Side Challenge, Macro for the time challenged

Pages:

...

Showing posts 101 - 125 of 343, (reverse)

Author

Thread

ursula

Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

10/05/2008 08:03:17 PM · #101

Originally posted by MattO:

....

Edit to add I highly recommend clicking the larger view link. :D

I didn't know that link existed! So the images are downsized, and images larger than xxx have a link to fullsize? What are the limits for images before they're downsized?

MattO

Nikon D4

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

10/05/2008 08:04:35 PM · #102

Originally posted by ursula:

Originally posted by MattO:
....

Edit to add I highly recommend clicking the larger view link. :D

I didn't know that link existed! So the images are downsized, and images larger than xxx have a link to fullsize? What are the limits for images before they're downsized?

640px I believe, such a shame, as the smaller photos really kill the detail of most shots.

Matt

roz

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

OM System 90mm f/3.5 Macro IS PRO M.Zuiko Digital ED

10/05/2008 09:56:20 PM · #103

hey matt

MattO where is the link to view the larger versions .. ??
i'm assuming its not the photograph information where it says "View full-sized image" ..:)

MattO

Nikon D4

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

10/05/2008 09:58:21 PM · #104

Originally posted by roz:

hey matt MattO where is the link to view the larger versions .. ??
i'm assuming its not the photograph information where it says "View full-sized image" ..:)

That is the link. View full-sized image. It should open to I think a 1500x900 image or so.

Matt

glad2badad

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Lensbaby Sweet 35 Optic

10/05/2008 10:05:08 PM · #105

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by ursula:

Originally posted by MattO:
....

Edit to add I highly recommend clicking the larger view link. :D

I didn't know that link existed! So the images are downsized, and images larger than xxx have a link to fullsize? What are the limits for images before they're downsized?

640px I believe, such a shame, as the smaller photos really kill the detail of most shots.

Matt

We need to test that. I have some in my portfolio that are 780 wide (thought the max was 1000) and they aren't showing a 'Link to Full Size'.

MattO

Nikon D4

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

10/05/2008 10:12:32 PM · #106

Originally posted by glad2badad:

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by ursula:

Originally posted by MattO:
....

Edit to add I highly recommend clicking the larger view link. :D

I didn't know that link existed! So the images are downsized, and images larger than xxx have a link to fullsize? What are the limits for images before they're downsized?

640px I believe, such a shame, as the smaller photos really kill the detail of most shots.

Matt

We need to test that. I have some in my portfolio that are 780 wide (thought the max was 1000) and they aren't showing a 'Link to Full Size'.

You are right, I'm not sure how big they go, I assumed it was the standard 640 standard size that was used for prints. But I do have some 800x600 and they dont have the link. So I'm not really sure. Maybe it is 1000. But even at 1000 the detail isnt as nice on images as it is for say 1500 and up. Of course it helps that I'm using a 22 inch monitor, I would imagine that smaller monitors might have alot of scrolling to do.

Matt

MelonMusketeer

Nikon D7000

Nikon MF 50mm f/1.4

10/05/2008 10:27:28 PM · #107

It's just magic how the "full size" link works. I would guess that posting images that size would eat up portfolio space, as well as opening them to being picked off from the web page to make prints.
It certainly is nice though, to be able to click a link to show them larger than the 640 max size that is normal for portfolio images. I agree that the small size makes it difficult to share an image that has it's strength in the details.
ETA, Maybe this discussion needs it's own thread so that it does not clutter up the S C thread.

Message edited by author 2008-10-05 22:30:17.

roz

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

OM System 90mm f/3.5 Macro IS PRO M.Zuiko Digital ED

10/05/2008 10:43:52 PM · #108

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by roz:
hey matt MattO where is the link to view the larger versions .. ??
i'm assuming its not the photograph information where it says "View full-sized image" ..:)

That is the link. View full-sized image. It should open to I think a 1500x900 image or so.

Matt

ahhhhh .. when i tried it before i didnt realise that the quality is a whole heap better in the full sized image .. i spose the fact that it was no bigger visually put me off .. :)

violinist123

Canon EOS-6D

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

10/05/2008 11:24:10 PM · #109

Originally posted by roz:

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by roz:
hey matt MattO where is the link to view the larger versions .. ??
i'm assuming its not the photograph information where it says "View full-sized image" ..:)

That is the link. View full-sized image. It should open to I think a 1500x900 image or so.

Matt

ahhhhh .. when i tried it before i didnt realise that the quality is a whole heap better in the full sized image .. i spose the fact that it was no bigger visually put me off .. :)

Depending on your web browser, you might have to click on the image which is displayed after you click 'view full size image' to get it to actually display at full size.

ursula

Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

10/06/2008 12:56:25 AM · #110

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by glad2badad:

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by ursula:

Originally posted by MattO:
....

Edit to add I highly recommend clicking the larger view link. :D

I didn't know that link existed! So the images are downsized, and images larger than xxx have a link to fullsize? What are the limits for images before they're downsized?

640px I believe, such a shame, as the smaller photos really kill the detail of most shots.

Matt

We need to test that. I have some in my portfolio that are 780 wide (thought the max was 1000) and they aren't showing a 'Link to Full Size'.

You are right, I'm not sure how big they go, I assumed it was the standard 640 standard size that was used for prints. But I do have some 800x600 and they dont have the link. So I'm not really sure. Maybe it is 1000. But even at 1000 the detail isnt as nice on images as it is for say 1500 and up. Of course it helps that I'm using a 22 inch monitor, I would imagine that smaller monitors might have alot of scrolling to do.

Matt

Mine are 900 or 950 (somewhere around there) usually, and they have the link. It makes a HUGE difference!

Mark-A

Canon EOS-5D Mark III

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

10/06/2008 06:55:14 AM · #111

Here's one I so nearly entered for the play challenge "Don't play with your food" but I am sure there would be plenty of votes against it due to it's subject matter :(

sfalice

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

10/06/2008 10:49:30 AM · #112

(And,

Mark-A I just answered your question in the image details section)

Message edited by author 2008-10-06 14:31:22.

aplomb76

Canon EOS-1D Mark IIn

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

10/06/2008 01:36:49 PM · #113

#5

same bug as #3

enjoy

tjbel05

Nikon Z9

Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

10/06/2008 05:33:18 PM · #114

Something slightly different for today. This is the top of the oil fill spout at my house.

Message edited by author 2008-10-06 17:34:28.

patio127

Sony Alpha a6000

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

10/06/2008 05:39:26 PM · #115

day 6

For my Mom-today would have been her 93rd birthday & she loved blue...

Message edited by author 2008-10-06 17:39:46.

bobonacus

Canon EOS-7D

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

10/06/2008 05:49:50 PM · #116

Prism

Pentax K-30

Pentax SMC DA 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR

10/06/2008 08:25:39 PM · #117

Originally posted by ursula:

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by glad2badad:

Originally posted by MattO:

Originally posted by ursula:

Originally posted by MattO:
....

Edit to add I highly recommend clicking the larger view link. :D

I didn't know that link existed! So the images are downsized, and images larger than xxx have a link to fullsize? What are the limits for images before they're downsized?

640px I believe, such a shame, as the smaller photos really kill the detail of most shots.

Matt

We need to test that. I have some in my portfolio that are 780 wide (thought the max was 1000) and they aren't showing a 'Link to Full Size'.

You are right, I'm not sure how big they go, I assumed it was the standard 640 standard size that was used for prints. But I do have some 800x600 and they dont have the link. So I'm not really sure. Maybe it is 1000. But even at 1000 the detail isnt as nice on images as it is for say 1500 and up. Of course it helps that I'm using a 22 inch monitor, I would imagine that smaller monitors might have alot of scrolling to do.

Matt

Mine are 900 or 950 (somewhere around there) usually, and they have the link. It makes a HUGE difference!

I believe the maximum size for in your portfolio is 800x800 and has been since at least the summer of 2006. After that you get the link.

GinaRothfels

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Olympus 8mm f/1.8 M.Zuiko Digital ED Fisheye PRO Lens

10/06/2008 09:06:40 PM · #118

So far I've only been playing with an old point-and-shoot for this challenge, as the only lens that I can produce decent macros with is my Sigma 70-300mm, which is my least favourite lens and one I hardly ever use. I will have to make some time to do something better, but for now, here is my first p&s offering:

I will be back soon to do some commenting.

glad2badad

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Lensbaby Sweet 35 Optic

10/06/2008 09:53:45 PM · #119

It might surprise you. :-D

Message edited by author 2008-10-06 23:07:04.

sfalice

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

10/06/2008 10:57:12 PM · #120

I won't keep going at this rate, as I've got a very busy time
coming up, but these were so much fun to do, that I kept going on them.

I had a nice set piece all ready to go,

Until I decided to introduce the little snail that followed me
home on a pomegranate, here...

and here

Prism

Pentax K-30

Pentax SMC DA 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR

10/06/2008 11:18:05 PM · #121

Here is my first image for this side challenge. Now off to make 3 comments!

sherpet

Canon EOS-350D Rebel XT

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

10/06/2008 11:35:29 PM · #122

I have been taking photos, but WHICH camera DO I USE..... YES, I know have my old faithful BACK with me after its repairs.....

I really do LOVE my Canon 350, but I also LOVE my new Canon 450.

Decisions decisions, I do not know what to DO. Yes I do, I will use them BOTH.....

I am comfortable with my Canon 350 but LOVE my new Canon 450 as the display screen and text is SO much LARGER.....

MACRO PHOTO'S coming later today..... I will also catch up with comments tonight..... love shez

Message edited by author 2008-10-06 23:36:22.

sulamk

Canon EOS-60D

Sigma 70-200 /2.8 APO EX DG Macro HSM II

10/07/2008 12:27:31 AM · #123

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

10/07/2008 04:52:13 AM · #124

Originally posted by sherpet:

Decisions decisions, I do not know what to DO. Yes I do, I will use them BOTH.....

Take macros of one with the other. ;-)

patio127

Sony Alpha a6000

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

10/07/2008 10:10:36 AM · #125

[thumb]729062[/thumb] Day 7

Pages:

...

Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 12:40:39 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.

Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 12:40:39 PM EDT.