Author | Thread |
|
09/26/2002 12:22:08 PM · #51 |
I think that the point everyone is missing is that the challenge guidelines should STATE that "there is room for interpretation" when that is the case, so that literal minded voters among us can be reassured by the Admins that it's "OK" to give a decent score to a pic that's a little more loose in interpretation.
Originally posted by Journey: There's nothing wrong with the way the challenges are worded. They leave room for interpretation which is good and it makes it more interesting to look at 200+ submissions.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 12:32:24 PM · #52 |
Originally posted by Journey: There's nothing wrong with the way the challenges are worded. They leave room for interpretation which is good and it makes it more interesting to look at 200+ submissions. What isn't so good is that some people narrowly define the challenges and then vote down submissions that don't meet that narrow definition.
There's also the issue of taste. It's perfectly okay to give someone a low score because you don't like it. What I don't find particularly helpful is getting a comment where someone tells me what is wrong and tells me how to fix it. What he/she sees as "wrong" in the subject matter is exactly why I was interested in the shot and also probably why someone gave me a 10. The comment reminded me of the Change This, Change That thread. What the comment described I ought to have done was such that I wouldn't have been interested in taking the shot at all.
And that is fine. It doesn't mean the commenter was wrong either. You've put your picture out there and requested people give you comments on them, they are telling you - well, I don't like what you've done, I think I'd prefer it this way or that way. You've asked them to express their opinion - it doesn't mean you have to agree, but there isn't anything wrong with someone telling you that they'd prefer things done differently. Also it is useful to hear about how someone else might want to frame it - it might have been something you hadn't thought about.
If it is, or you think about it and reject it, that's fine too.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 12:32:32 PM · #53 |
I've always thought an artist's interpertation of a challenge was a matter of Choice. Because that affects style. Style is individual expression. Self expression is art. |
|
|
09/26/2002 12:42:07 PM · #54 |
Magnetic, yes that might be helpful and I would like to see that advice added to the challenges. Still, I think some people think so much in stereotypes that anything falling outside those will be viewed by them as "not meeting the challenge".
If you would be specific in wording the challenge and say the challenge is "horse" an image of a polar bear would definitely not meet the challenge. But then there would also be folks who would see pictures of the knight in the chess game as not meeting the challenge or a fine still life involving the gear of a horse rider without actually showing the horse. |
|
|
09/26/2002 12:47:24 PM · #55 |
I think we should go to ONE WORD challenge topics with NO explanation of the topic at all... ie:
BLUE FORK WATER LIFE GAMES NATURE MUSIC HARMNOY DISCORD TECHNOLOGY TRANSPORTATION LOVE HATE FUN ACTION
Maybe it IS the limited description that creates all the various issues each week.
The guidelines, whether they be loose or strict are what causes the 'doesn't meet the challenge' issue...
* This message has been edited by the author on 9/26/2002 12:46:58 PM.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 12:56:55 PM · #56 |
"literal minded voters among us can be reassured by the Admins that it's "OK" to give a decent score to a pic"
This is possibly the most bizarre thing I have ever read outside of a sect. Why would one need the admins OK for any score? Do you think the admins rate your score? Do you really worry what the admins think of you? Hmmmmm.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 12:58:00 PM · #57 |
That's funny. I wrote a similar post in another forum while you were posting this and some of the topics were the same as well. |
|
|
09/26/2002 01:04:36 PM · #58 |
The 'blurb' on the challenge topic each wee is what introduces the problem of misinterpretations. A one word topic with no 'guidelines' would give the photographer complete freedom and the voter would not be forced to determine if any guidelines were met that are specified in the 'blurb'.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 01:08:24 PM · #59 |
You have a good point John but don't forget how well FEAR went over. ;0 |
|
|
09/26/2002 01:12:57 PM · #60 |
maybe i did not phrase this clearly.
here is an example:
challenge is 'fruits and vegetables.' someone shoots a picture of a pair of panties with a cherry on them. Under current conditions, our poor literal-minded voter (LMV) says 'hey that's not a real fruit, im lowering the score.'
BUT, in the Utopia proposed by magnetic9999, LMV has read the challenge guideline which says 'In this challenge, liberal interpretations are acceptable." "Hooray!" exclaims LMV. "The powers that be have given their stamp of approval. I can open my mind and not be a hair-splitter."
Maybe you and I don't need this kind of validation, but believe me, as someone who has been on this site for a looong time now, I can tell you that a lot of people are really rigid sticklers for what that little box on the front page says.
(A sect, huh? That's a telling statement in and of itself. I havent read too much sect documentation, have you? Which sect would you be referring to? Do they happen to wear purple outfits ? ;) )....
Originally posted by jakking: "literal minded voters among us can be reassured by the Admins that it's "OK" to give a decent score to a pic"
This is possibly the most bizarre thing I have ever read outside of a sect. Why would one need the admins OK for any score? Do you think the admins rate your score? Do you really worry what the admins think of you? Hmmmmm.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 01:13:31 PM · #61 |
Originally posted by JohnSetzler : The 'blurb' on the challenge topic each wee is what introduces the problem of misinterpretations. A one word topic with no 'guidelines' would give the photographer complete freedom and the voter would not be forced to determine if any guidelines were met that are specified in the 'blurb'.
I don't think voters are 'forced' to interpute challenges in rigid, narrow ways... I think some (a small minority I believe) just live to say "Does not meet the challenge = 1"
Chalk it up to human nature and let them live in their own rigid, narrow minded corner of the world :) Scores are just a number, it's the photo that counts :)
|
|
|
09/26/2002 01:16:36 PM · #62 |
But, if there are no guidelines, there would be no real need for literal interpretations. For the interpretation to be literal, there have to be guidelines...
|
|
|
09/26/2002 01:18:36 PM · #63 |
i would think this would be a good idea except that the obvious fallout would be tons of AGONIZING in the forums.
for example for discord: "If I show a C tuning fork and an F# tuning fork together, will people GET IT?!?!?!?!"
<smacks forehead>
Originally posted by JohnSetzler : I think we should go to ONE WORD challenge topics with NO explanation of the topic at all... ie:
BLUE FORK WATER LIFE GAMES NATURE MUSIC HARMNOY DISCORD TECHNOLOGY TRANSPORTATION LOVE HATE FUN ACTION
Maybe it IS the limited description that creates all the various issues each week.
The guidelines, whether they be loose or strict are what causes the 'doesn't meet the challenge' issue...
|
|
|
09/26/2002 01:26:18 PM · #64 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999: [i] <smacks forehead>
<hands mag a helmet> :-D |
|
|
09/26/2002 01:52:02 PM · #65 |
Originally posted by ABC: One other thing....if the photos must remain annonymous until the close,so should the voter's comments.
I must say that this week I purposely unchecked my votes and comments in the preference part of my profile so I wouldn't know how I was scoring until I finished voting on all the photos. It was like a big weight being lifted and I found voting a pleasure for the first time. I would also like to say that not all of us have neat buildings and scenery to shoot and also there are no children for miles for me. I have learned a lot from this challenge and find that I am trying new techniques and taking many more photos. A nice rating is good but the learning experence is priceless. |
|
|
09/26/2002 02:12:27 PM · #66 |
"(A sect, huh? That's a telling statement in and of itself. I havent read too much sect documentation, have you? Which sect would you be referring to? Do they happen to wear purple outfits ? ;) )...."
Any sect that thinks other people should tell them what to do is fine. No uniforms needed.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 02:42:17 PM · #67 |
Originally posted by jakking:
Any sect that thinks other people should tell them what to do is fine. No uniforms needed.
Well, guess what then? A lot of people on this site look to the guidelines for how to assess the merit of a picture. Guess that makes it a sect. Anyway, doesn't matter what you call it. Since that's the case, there has to be better guidelines.
:)
|
|
|
09/26/2002 03:37:46 PM · #68 |
all right, i don't want to chime in but somehow i feel compelled. i guess you'd classify me as a LMV ... i LIKE the challenges that are specific because it makes it a more even playing field and encourages people to be creative within the given limits. i still think pencils was one of the more narrowly defined challenge (and yes, i think a horses' pencil was not within the intent of the challenge and therefore didn't meet the challenge), but pencils also resulted in the most creative photos i've seen together in one challenge.
i would've liked 'my corner' to be more specific by asking us to "submit a photo that could be used as a postcard representing your corner of the world." i think it's the addition of "it could be as small as something in your bedroom or as big as a monument" (i'm paraphrasing here) that seems to be causing all the confusion.
ok, i'll be quiet now that i got this off my chest. let the arguments begin :)
|
|
|
09/26/2002 03:48:57 PM · #69 |
I tried to get outside the 'literal' interpretation of the "something new" challenge with my Needful Things photograph. This was a 'conceptual' interpretation of 'something new' and it was my lowest scoring photo...
|
|
|
09/26/2002 04:14:53 PM · #70 |
Hi all;
This challenge, IMO, has the greatest display of photography since I joined the site. I personally, haven't found anything to score as less than average. Even the photo I submitted, that I was wishing I had unsubmitted, is doing better than average. ( and Mr Setzler gave it a 9-----I'd like to discuss this after the challenge) Most of the photos this week are extremely well done. I think this should be a high scoring week and The competition this week is absolutely amazing.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 05:25:28 PM · #71 |
I am confused when you say that you do not have anything below the average. I do not have a 1 so far (voted half of the;) but I hqve 2s and 3s like the other weeks. Lionel |
|
|
09/26/2002 06:45:50 PM · #72 |
I have to go now.... I am off to California... apparently EVERYTHING to be photographed is there (and yes, I got the same "I can see this in CA".
Maybe next week's challenge should be CALIFORNIA - we all have something that we can photograph. <smacks magnetic's head. for fun>
|
|
|
09/26/2002 10:39:21 PM · #73 |
Originally posted by lionelm: I am confused when you say that you do not have anything below the average. I do not have a 1 so far (voted half of the;) but I hqve 2s and 3s like the other weeks. Lionel
I've completed my voting and only found two pictures I rated lower than 5 and they both received a 4. I just think this is a really good collection of photographs for the My Corner challenge. Maybe I'm just in a better than normal mood this week. I can't remember being this impressed with the entire challenge collection in the short few months since I have been a member.
|
|
|
09/26/2002 10:52:40 PM · #74 |
all im saying is that more could be done with the challenge description.
it is not being used to its full potential, imo. : )
|
|
|
09/30/2002 11:40:17 AM · #75 |
Originally posted by Sonifo: I was expecting pictures of what your town looked like or the area you live, so I knew what the your part of the world looked like. I know what shoes and bedrooms look like. We have five bedrooms in our house. Some clean and others well we never open the doors. It would be nice to see what there is beyond the rooms, so if we planned a trip or if we seen your comment we could say wow they live in a cool place. I want to go there. I am not saying that I vote you all down because I didn't get what I wanted. It would have been neat. I guess I will have to keep getting my vacation magezine.
I guess this would be as good a post as any for me to use to illustrate my thoughts on this challenge. The challenge was "your" corner of the world, and in my opinion it's difficult for someone else to determine, and thus judge, just exactly wwhat "I" would consider "my" corner of the world.
I joined DPC after submission for that challenge, but in time to vote, and have thought much over the last few days what kind of shot I would've submitted. One definitely would've been a shot of my computer area, as that is where I spend probably 50% of my time. One might've been some shot from the greenhouse where I work, because that is another corner of my world, and where I spend a lot of time.
Also, Sonifo says I was expecting pictures of what your town ..., but that is not what *I* was expecting. *I* was expecting something that spoke to me of the submitter's self.
Gah, lot here for my first post, but I guess what I'm trying to say is that interpretation is subjective. For instance, some of you might be surprised as to what first came to my mind with the current challenge.
j
* This message has been edited by the author on 9/30/2002 11:38:47 AM. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/04/2025 11:15:40 AM EDT.