Author | Thread |
|
06/22/2006 02:01:01 PM · #226 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate: Originally posted by island_girl1: I had a 5.1xxx earlier this morning and it has since dropped to a 5.0xxx :( |
I've been dropping stedily for 2 days now...3 comments - one says '9' and one says'10' - so why the 5.11? It started at 5.88!
Arrrrgh.
On the plus side - i've had 3 wedding inquiries this week - you can vote me a 3 if you pay me! |
the 5.1xxx is the highest it's been. I have 5 comments, 4 positive and 1 pretty much saying 'this is what I would have done differently.'
I hope your score starts going back up. and good luck with the wedding inquiries! |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:15:22 PM · #227 |
Originally posted by CVette: OK, this is discouraging. After dropping from 5.7 to 5.4 I got hit with a 1. Yes, it's a flower but it's got great bokeh, color, contrast and composition. Why do people feel the need to hand out 1's with no comment as to why or how to improve?
After cruising through my first 3 challenges care-free, I'm starting to see what people mean about a thick skin. |
That is sick! Really unneccesary! I think there should be a set of rules that say not to suggest a comment, but to demand a comment for all scores, 3 and below. I might be too generous with my scores, most of the scores I give are 4 to 8. Above or below is only rarely, and below 4 must really be DNMC + bad + this must be a mistake. 9 and 10 are only for really extraordinary shots, must meet challenge, be really beautiful, original and good work.
I wish there was a set of rules as for what all the scores should be. I would dare to suggest one, then you can all comment - maybe some day it will be rules?
1:DNMC, blurry, grainy and just so bad it might as well have been done with a disposable camera. Brown ribbon material!
2:DNMC, but slightly better than 1
3:Either DNMC, or it is of so poor quality and/or boring it is not even worth a 4
4:Barely meets challenge, or picture of doubtful quality
5:Mainstream, middle-of-the-road ordinary picture, meats challenge, at least somewhat
6:Meets challenge, slightly better than average
7:Meets challenge well, two notches above average, good quality
8:Meets challenge well, even better than 7, very good quality and only a few glitches
9:Meets challenge perfectly, brilliant idea, original, perfect in anyway, except that one thing that means it cannot be a ten
10:meets challenge perfectly and originally. Perfect. Brilliant. Nice. Add-to-favorite potential.
Alternately, as I have seen some users do, give 2-3 points on various points like:
Meets challenge: 0 to 3 points
Original: 0 to 3 points
Technical: 0 to 2 points
Aestetical: 0 to 2 points
(or something similar)
Maybe off topic!
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 14:30:36.
|
|
|
06/22/2006 02:31:48 PM · #228 |
next comment that tells me that my picture "looks like -censored-"...uraghfrustration. it is a compliment. i understand that. i consider it a very high compliment. but. that's not what it was suppossed to be, i didn't even have that in mind, and no, i didn't -censored-...!
:(
still south of 5.0, too. |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:43:33 PM · #229 |
Yes the Trolls are back... just got 2 and 3 thanks! |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:44:49 PM · #230 |
Just out of curiosity, why only look at my entry? Why not vote while you're there?
If I look at your photo, I cast a vote. I have 138 views and 110 votes. Makes no sense to me.
I don't do the minimum 20%, I go the whole way baby! |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:45:03 PM · #231 |
Someone must have just changed their minds! 124 votes still, but score went from above to below 6, same amount of votes!
I have wondered whether there are users here who spread around them so poor votes as to pull everyones score down but their own ... every time you give a 10, you reduce your chance of getting a ribobn yourself!
|
|
|
06/22/2006 02:50:28 PM · #232 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo: Yes the Trolls are back... just got 2 and 3 thanks! |
You mean to tell me that people sign up just give crap votes????
=( |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:53:51 PM · #233 |
I'm sure some do but if caught we sic ART on them with his torches!
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 14:54:10. |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:55:04 PM · #234 |
Originally posted by cuspie: Just out of curiosity, why only look at my entry? Why not vote while you're there?
If I look at your photo, I cast a vote. I have 138 views and 110 votes. Makes no sense to me.
I don't do the minimum 20%, I go the whole way baby! |
Some people, like me today for instance, vote first and then go back and comment later. This increases your views, but not your votes. |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:56:51 PM · #235 |
Originally posted by kdsprog: Some people, like me today for instance, vote first and then go back and comment later. This increases your views, but not your votes. |
And I thank you for it! You were very kind and I love the comment!
:-) |
|
|
06/22/2006 02:59:36 PM · #236 |
Yea, getting my ass handed to me. Barely hanging on to a 6.0xx down from a 6.3xx this morning..this is lame!
|
|
|
06/22/2006 03:02:59 PM · #237 |
my score is 4,3 and it ROCKS !!! |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:07:06 PM · #238 |
Originally posted by cuspie: Originally posted by thegrandwazoo: Yes the Trolls are back... just got 2 and 3 thanks! |
You mean to tell me that people sign up just give crap votes????
=( |
I think we can track those people and probably ask them to be nice :P I know it is all database related and votes also can be tracked :) |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:27:28 PM · #239 |
How are you able to determine what your last votes are? |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:28:39 PM · #240 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
I went to Medical School in Albany. |
Cool!
Originally posted by B74A:
That is sick! Really unneccesary! I think there should be a set of rules that say not to suggest a comment, but to demand a comment for all scores, 3 and below. I might be too generous with my scores, most of the scores I give are 4 to 8. Above or below is only rarely, and below 4 must really be DNMC + bad + this must be a mistake. 9 and 10 are only for really extraordinary shots, must meet challenge, be really beautiful, original and good work. |
That's just about how I vote:
1-3: almost never
4: grainy, poor shot, obvious little effort - I always try to leave a comment when I vote a 4.
5: Average but doesn't grab me
6: Nice all around shot
7: Above average and a decent WOW factor
8-9: Best of show, huge WOW factor and originality
10: I think should ribbon - I usually try to give at least one 10, sometimes 3-4 10's.
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 15:40:10. |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:30:35 PM · #241 |
Originally posted by pcphotos: How are you able to determine what your last votes are? |
Members have an update button so can track votes a little more closely than the hourly update allows. A little math is involved. |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:31:10 PM · #242 |
Originally posted by cuspie: Just out of curiosity, why only look at my entry? Why not vote while you're there?
If I look at your photo, I cast a vote. I have 138 views and 110 votes. Makes no sense to me.
I don't do the minimum 20%, I go the whole way baby! |
Sometimes people will look at a picture more than once, but voting can be done only once. |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:32:35 PM · #243 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti: Originally posted by pcphotos: How are you able to determine what your last votes are? |
Members have an update button so can track votes a little more closely than the hourly update allows. A little math is involved. |
Ahh gotcha. And when you say members you mean paying members right? |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:33:35 PM · #244 |
Originally posted by pcphotos: Originally posted by cpanaioti: Originally posted by pcphotos: How are you able to determine what your last votes are? |
Members have an update button so can track votes a little more closely than the hourly update allows. A little math is involved. |
Ahh gotcha. And when you say members you mean paying members right? |
yes. One of the little extras supplied for supporting the site. ;o) |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:44:54 PM · #245 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti: Originally posted by pcphotos: Originally posted by cpanaioti: Originally posted by pcphotos: How are you able to determine what your last votes are? |
Members have an update button so can track votes a little more closely than the hourly update allows. A little math is involved. |
Ahh gotcha. And when you say members you mean paying members right? |
yes. One of the little extras supplied for supporting the site. ;o) |
Only been here since May, but so far looks great. Will probably getting some $ from me soon ;). As long as I can take the heat from the trolls. But yeah, getting feedback is a valuable asset and have been getting this from the user of this site, which I like be it good or bad. Lots a great photographers here :). Would eventually like to be a part of the group :) |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:45:21 PM · #246 |
Personally I think there are to many threads debating on the difference is between broken vs. boken while the voting period is going on that has influenced some (many voters).
Now so many voters are confused on how to vote!
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 15:46:11.
|
|
|
06/22/2006 03:45:24 PM · #247 |
Well, some seriously lame sh!t is going on cause I just got a one...
Votes: 141
Views: 224
Avg Vote: 6.0000
Comments: 15
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
NOW....
Votes: 142
Views: 225
Avg Vote: 5.9648
Comments: 15
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
GGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
06/22/2006 03:47:45 PM · #248 |
Originally posted by Southern Gentleman: Personally I think there are to many threads debating on the difference is between broken vs. boken while the voting period is going on that has influenced some (many voters).
Now so many voters are confused on how to vote! |
Those entered are just as confused. ;o)
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 15:47:58. |
|
|
06/22/2006 03:49:54 PM · #249 |
I just got this comment and I now have identified another troll for ART to burn.
"cheesy"
Thank you so much for your valuable insight into the art of photography. I learned so much from your comment!
Thats it I am done with this challenge. On to the next member challenge.
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 15:53:02. |
|
|
06/22/2006 04:14:05 PM · #250 |
Originally posted by kudzu: Originally posted by idnic: LOL classic! You're going to be okay, Shane. Just take it one day at a time. :) |
girl, as long as my score is above my over all average, i'm just peachy.
over all avg : 5.44
avg for bokeh : 5.8974 |
Votes: 133
Views: 158
Avg Vote: 5.8496
Comments: 5
my pictures is still a flower and i'm still peachy, though slightly bruised....
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 03:33:41 PM EDT.