| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:36:38 PM · #1			 | 
		
		| Mine are always blown out - stupid overcast sky!! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:37:16 PM · #2			 | 
		
		see!  grr!!
   |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:40:31 PM · #3			 | 
		
		shot with a polarizer CPL
 
                                
 
 Is this enough sky? :D
 
 This seems to be my only blown one :(
  
  Message edited by author 2005-10-13 22:44:49. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:44:39 PM · #4			 | 
		
		 
 Them's perty!  I got ONE (it's always cloudy here). |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:46:31 PM · #5			 | 
		
		| even the one you consider blown isn't!  i'm so jealous! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:46:33 PM · #6			 | 
		
		 
 
 Circular polarizer. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:49:53 PM · #7			 | 
		
		 | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:52:13 PM · #8			 | 
		
		and the mother of 'em all...
 
   |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:52:50 PM · #9			 | 
		
		 
 circular polarizer, curves, contrast
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:53:13 PM · #10			 | 
		
		| MAN - i need to move - where you from?  I could use a few blue-sky days!! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:54:07 PM · #11			 | 
		
		florida has the best skys ever
 
 florida!!!@#!@#$!@#$!#
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:55:34 PM · #12			 | 
		
		All the skies I posted except for the last one (Somewhere Between Heaven and Earth) are straight from the camera. No adjustments. Slight USM but that's about it.
 
 To get the best skies using a polarizer, you have to be at the right angle to the sun :) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:56:18 PM · #13			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Noggin:   MAN - i need to move - where you from?  I could use a few blue-sky days!!  |   
 
 California... the Bay Area where we get no clouds :( well hardly :) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 10:57:05 PM · #14			 | 
		
		  <--guess I just need some blue-sky days.  I live I live in The Cloudy Belt! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:01:20 PM · #15			 | 
		
		| Would a polarizer help any in my last one? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:02:37 PM · #16			 | 
		
		 | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:03:32 PM · #17			 | 
		
		No filter used on any of these sky shots. I mostly expose on the sky because I find it easier to bring out the darks than fix the blown out highlights.
 
         
       
       
    
  Message edited by author 2005-10-13 23:09:58. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:05:40 PM · #18			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Noggin:   Would a polarizer help any in my last one?  |   
 
 A circular polarizer only helps if the sky is blue and even better if it has clouds.
 
 A graduated nd filter may add a little color depending on which one you put onto the camera. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:11:07 PM · #19			 | 
		
		 | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:13:57 PM · #20			 | 
		
		My DPC Clouds and Skies gallery
 
 More clouds at DPC
 
 Clouds and Sunsets gallery at pBase.
 
 I think my most successful shots are made with exposure compensation set at -1/3 or -2/3, and then I meter off the brightest part of the clouds, sky or sun.
 
 But if the foreground is dark, only a graduated ND filter (or multiple image post-processing) will allow buth a dark FG and a bright sky to have "proper" exposure -- no film or sensor has enough dynamic range to capture it all.
  Message edited by author 2005-10-13 23:16:54. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:15:51 PM · #21			 | 
		
		   
 some dodging and burning,and hue and saturation |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:24:48 PM · #22			 | 
		
		 
 One of my favorites.  No filter, just small apeture & longer exposure.
  Message edited by author 2005-10-13 23:27:27. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:27:24 PM · #23			 | 
		
		Originally posted by pekesty:    
 One of my favorites.  |   
 
 heres a clickable one:  
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:30:37 PM · #24			 | 
		
		I used a circular polarizer on all of these.  Some I may have added a gradient overlay as well.
  .. .. .. 
  .. .. .. 
  Message edited by author 2005-10-13 23:32:45.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/13/2005 11:33:18 PM · #25			 | 
		
		Can't post this one directly, it's too darn big, and it just does not translate to small size well at all. 
 This was taken on 09/30/2005 with the Canon 5D and canon 24/1.4L at f/2.8. it is nearly the full frame, but is cropped slightly to get rid of some coma on the far corners. It is a 360-second exposure, using a tracking mount, in this case an EQ-5 equatorial mount.
 
 CAUTION, this image is over 1MB
 
 //kirbic.smugmug.com/photos/39922927-O.jpg
  Message edited by author 2005-10-13 23:33:37.
  |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 05:31:05 AM EST.