in between.
by ShannonLee

Comment:
Ok, there is a ragining debte about people's voting habits at the moment, so i will attempt to give a detailed comment with my vote:

This seems to me like a simple shot that didn;t take muc htime to do. No controlled lighting which is fine if there is something else to compensate for it but htis shot doesn't. It's a basic shot with no capture of a specific moment. it's a girl standing between two buses. The crop is also a little off i find. The feet are cut off which makes it a little ackward i find. The focus is there and you obvisouly meet hte challenge. But it's an average shot. 5

"Please don't do that," my mom
by bergwalters

Comment:
Ok, there is a ragining debte about people's voting habits at the moment, so i will attempt to give a detailed comment with my vote:

Ok, so the title says it all about the facial expression. Props for that. Image is nice and sharp. The bokeh is great. Makes the photo that much more 3d. However it's not an exceptional capture. there is no wow effect here for me...i'm thinking 6 or 7, but seeing how everyone is pissed at there low scores, 7 ;)

Silly Boy
by leighannimal

Comment:
Ok, there is a ragining debte about people's voting habits at the moment, so i will attempt to give a detailed comment with my vote:

OK, so i find this to be an average shot. It's a snap shot, without any controlled lighting etc. One does not always need excellent lighting but as a result your need something to that type of photo to make up for that lack of "wow" lighting, and this photo doesn't seem to have it. Maye had it been an exceptional facial expression, or moment in time. This just seems to me like: hey Timmy, can i take a picture of you? oh open your mouth to make it cooler kinda thing. Also SIZE! Always take advantage of the 640 size! You can hurt when the pictures are much smaller. Final score: 5

She lights up the room when she enters.
by Jewelly

Comment:
Ok, there is a ragining debte about people's voting habits at the moment, so i will attempt to give a detailed comment with my vote:

I find that the shot is tooo overexposed. You lose facial details that normally make a person's face interesting to look at. And the eyes are overly processed, and not only to they stand out too much, but they actually make me feel uncomfortable. However the capture of the smile is very effective and has to be taken into account. Also composition wise it;s quite good with the capture of the moment! 6 because it's above average but overly processed.

The lighter side
by whereswheats

Comment:
Ok, there is a ragining debte about people's voting habits at the moment, so i will attempt to give a detailed comment with my vote:

So first of all this shot stands out i find. It's simple and the lighting is very effective. Half of your face shows, the other half doesn't. The eye is super effective and the DOF is good. maybe have the ear sharp too but i don't really mind there. THis is a 7 in my opion because there is quality to the image. Not enough to go higher than that but it's most definitely a higher than average shot

Portrait of Past and Present --> (Horses and Cars)
by meetpd

Comment:
DNMC. Portrait of past and present? Then can I take a photo of a lamp post of a kiwi and say "portrait of a lam post/kiwi"? Hmmm, i dont htink so. Sorry about that

Steeple
by redskymedic

Comment:
umm....DNMC

vacation hat
by aplomb76

Comment:
nice patterns, nice epxression, could be sharper

The Ring
by MAK

Comment:
very cool, but the eye ove processed.

corndogs gone wild
by ckdake

Comment:
:) 7