Air Dried
by soup

Comment:
Outstanding work. I hate it when someone comes up with something so simple and pulls it off so darn well 10.

Small Teeth
by RiedJim

Comment:
This is reasonable composition to me. The focus looks poor somehow. I think it should have been on the foreground most extremity (the handle.) Perhaps adding more space to the left to move the saw out of center would accentuate it's perspective and size better also?

Technology from the last Millennium!
by Winterberg

Comment:
Cool photo. How did you do make it "float" like that?

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.

Basic but LOUD
by Beetle

Comment:
This is clearly an electronic clock, despite it looks - unless you fired a speed-light at each second increment perfectly timed :| (Wind-up clocks don't do perfect second increments like that. Do they?)

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.

8mm... pre-camcorder.
by notonline

Comment:
"non-electronic" This is an electronicly assisted camera.

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.

Electric Light ... since 1879
by t_online

Comment:
Nice photo. But a light bulb is ELECTRONIC by dictionary definition.

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.

Main Entry: elec·tron·ic
Pronunciation: i-"lek-'trä-nik
Function: adjective
1 : of or relating to electrons
2 : of, relating to, or utilizing devices constructed or working by the methods or principles of electronics; ...

Just a man and his guitar
by SharQ

Comment:
"non-electronic"? Oops. 1.

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable. 7.

Before FM
by Bela45

Comment:
Nice photo. But a "radiogram" ELECTRONIC. The challenge states "non-electronic" as a requirement.

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.

The Old Way
by digistoune

Comment:
Umm, yes, but it's "electronic" - granted, not in itself, but it the key and essential part of of an electronic unit relying on electron alignment for operation.

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.

Vintage Toast
by Sweetlips

Comment:
"non-electronic"? This is low tech as far as electric toasters go, but it's an electronic toaster. The composition, on the other hand is excellent. But as it doesn't meet the challenge specification I have no choice but to give it a 1. Sorry. (There are at least ten other entries that have made this mistake.)

[edit]
OK. There's a hot debate running in the forums about what exactly is "electronic".

I have decided to subtract only one point for items I believe to be electronic, rahter than the hard-line "1" I originally issued for such items. This is far more fair and reasonable.