| Image |
Comment |
| 07/25/2002 05:54:00 PM |
A touch of Julyby aelithComment: I think this is a well composed image, but the shelf support and the shelf in the background is just a bit distracting. = 6 - jmsetzler |
| 07/28/2002 04:52:00 PM |
Ent's Eyeby myqylComment: This is some interesting texture... i personally like thins image in a vertical orientation a little better... good work :) = 7 - jmsetzler |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/28/2002 10:42:00 AM |
Sunflower-lookin upby kevinswopeComment: this is a very nice photo... the texture in the center of the sunflower works very well... I think a fill flash would possibly accent that texture quite a bit as well :) = 7 - jmsetzler |
| 07/26/2002 09:19:00 AM |
Pink Murexby autoolComment: this is definitely interesting texture. I think the shell is slightly over exposed... the lighting is a little overpowering and it is creating a few harsh shadows as well. This particular photo may be an example of where some minor diffusion of the flash would be helpful. You can accomplish this by trying things like bouncing the flash off the ceiling if your flash tilts... if not, you could tape a small piece of tissue paper over the flash... = 6 - jmsetzler |
| 07/28/2002 05:20:00 PM |
big ben 1000 piecesby brent matsuoComment: this is a nice interpretation of the texture challenge... if you could have made the colors really punch a little harder, this would have been excellent :) = 6 - jmsetzler |
| 07/23/2002 10:31:00 PM |
Rubber Leather Polyesterby djbdjComment: take a look at this image... as you can see, there is a sharply focused segment that extends from left to right just slightly below the center of the frame. The foreground in front of this strip and the background behind this strip are out of focus. This area that is IN focus is within your depth of field. This indicates a low F number (wide aperture) setting on your camera. I don't know what kind of camera was used here, but a larger F number (smaller aperture) in the aperture priority mode (or manual mode) would extend this plane of focus through a larger portion of your image. It also appears that the camera lens may be resting close to the surface. If this is the case, raising the camera up a few inches and pointing it down at a slightly lower angle would allow the foreground to be in better focus as well. Your camera has a minimum distance from the lens in which it can focus effectively, regardless of the aperture settings. = 5 - jmsetzler |
| 07/22/2002 02:45:00 PM |
Treeby malapropamComment: good texture but the lighting is a little strong... - 4 - jmsetzler |
| 07/28/2002 05:13:00 PM |
IN VEINby MartinComment: This is nice texture but the exposure seems a little strange on this.. the 'brights' are a touch too bright for my taste... the composition is nice :) = 7 - jmsetzler |
| 07/24/2002 11:21:00 AM |
Prickly Sunsetby Gene L.Comment: This is great... the lighting and shadows cast on this cactus are quite nice... my only critique on this image is that I would have preferred to see a little less darkness across the bottom of the frame. I think that a slightly higher camera angle would have made two improvements here... first, it would have removed the dark band across the bottom of the frame... secondly, it would have kept the top of the cactus from being so close to the top edge of the frame. It is a little too close for comfort at the top... a little breathing room there would be nice :) = 8 - jmsetzler |
| 07/24/2002 11:04:00 AM |
Katydidby skylineComment: excellent macro :) Everyone knows I like 'wet' photos :) This is a great shot... = 9 - jmsetzler |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/12/2025 09:04:54 AM EST.