Image |
Comment |
| 01/20/2005 01:57:04 PM |
Conspiracy Theory by TechnoShroomComment: Thank you all. I'm glad so many people really liked my photo. In case anyone was interested this scene was photographed with a regular table lamp (100w bulb) lighting the background and a clamp-on shop light (100w bulb) lighting the foreground duck. On the camera a Canon 100mm f2.8 macro. The foreground duck is less than a foot away from the lens to fill the frame and the background ducks, which are roughly the same size as the foreground duck, are placed about three feet behind so they appear smaller.
Originally posted by Chrisds: Congratualtaions on not putting your ducks in a bowl and going for 'duck soup' |
It never would have occurred to me, I'd never heard of the movie Duck Soup before the voting period began. Er... um... I mean, yes, I planned it that way. :)
Originally posted by Sailingduck: It is amazing what you can find in the house to make these challenges work. |
I actually had just one duck at home. I keep him above the shower but he's so old, cracked, and faded that he doesn't look good on camera. After I got the idea I went to four different stores looking for ducks with the right look. First three either didn't have them or had ducks with the wrong look. Luckily the fourth store had decent ducks for my project and I bought all they had. I hope I haven't denied a child some fun in the tub.
Originally posted by andr00: you are a genius!!! |
Yes, yes I am. But that has nothing to do with the photo. ;)
Again, thank you all. Message edited by author 2005-01-20 14:04:02. |
| 01/19/2005 03:02:11 PM |
Miracle in basic editing by graphicfunkComment: I think this image looks slightly better with a white background rather than a grey one. Very interesting effect. I look forward to reading about how you achieved the transition. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/19/2005 02:56:14 PM |
Homespunby bananashayComment: Interesting technique but it doesn't work here. This technique really only works when the axis of spin lands on a point of interest. For example if her eye was at the axis rather than the forehead this would be much better. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/19/2005 12:27:03 AM |
The Perfect Stormby helgihelgiComment: Ooooooookkkkkkk. I will never get DPC voters. I was one of the 6 who gave your shot a 10. Have people never seen an aerial view of a hurricane? I thought this was great and as usual am disappointed how low photos I like tend to score. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/17/2005 02:09:06 PM |
Harveyby xtabintunComment: At first I thought the image was relatively well done but it didn't hold any real interest for me. Over the week though this has grown on me. While the photo doesn't have to relate to the movie, only the title. I think you've done a good job relating to both. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2005 01:07:26 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/14/2005 08:26:35 AM |
Carrieby sacredspiritComment: If you would have changed the angle of the light slightly or diffused it you wouldn't have run into the problem of parts of the dress desaturating when you desaturated the rest of the photo. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/12/2005 06:14:29 AM |
Meatballsby gedisaComment: Title and photo match but the image looks out of focus. |
| 01/12/2005 05:43:14 AM |
|
| 01/12/2005 05:28:34 AM |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/27/2025 10:06:38 AM EDT.