Canberra at night
by MattB

Comment:
Looks like a black cat at midnight to me.
There had to be at least one.

Geometry
by Jinjit

Comment:
Tree or shadow at 9:00 takes from this otherwise very nice shot.

County Courthouse
by Bud

Comment:
Interesting color and lighting.

Ribbit!
by tolovemoon

Comment:
Looks blurred. Hand held??

Steeltown
by Strikeslip

Comment:
Looks blurred - but the smoke stacks in the back look ok.

Aurora
by mcmurma

Comment:
Wow. Best so far, by far. Great composition; technically excellent. I can't wait to see how you did this. A 10 - frame it & hang it.

Drops of Jupiter- Train
by marbo

Comment:
Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) � A fairly centered, single object. I think the photo would have improved by shifting the planet up and to the right some (the infamous rule of thirds guideline). But I think it would help here. What is possibly out of your control is what else gets included. I am thinking specifically of a few stars. Would be the �drops� in the title. You noted that the moons were not included.
(2) BACKGROUND � Without the stars, the empty space is clearly good �negative space�.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL � For we amateurs, this is a very good photo of Jupiter. For this challenge, almost everybody wants to see the main subject in focus and without noise. The handholding may have hurt a tad at 1/30 sec.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL � Looks pretty good to me. You may have improved the image quality by reducing the noise in the image, either via Photoshop or another program like Neat Image. The rules say �Any filter or stand-alone utility designed and used to preserve the integrity of the image and/or reduce the effects of noise, scratches, etc, are permitted. These include but are not limited to the Sharpen, Unsharp Mask, and Dust & Scratches filters, and standalone image cleanup utilities such as NeatImage.�
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO � You went for a very literal interpretation of the song title � and produced a very good photo of Jupiter. It�s unlikely anyone else here could duplicate it or better it by shooting from home. A very good result on a difficult project. However, as I said above, the clarity of it hurts you in this challenge. The noise and the blur on the outer edge � when compared to the other photos of earth bound objects � reduce the score. If this were a science project, you would have scored high (in my opinion).

Jim msp

Gonsalves and Jerry Place
by daysez

Comment:
Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) � I like the composition of this shot. The eye is drawn to the upper right to the sign. Good balance of color between main subject and background.
(2) BACKGROUND � The background you chose works well, an effective use of negative space.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL � Focus on the sign is very good. I think your choice of aperture gave you too large a DOF. I think the photo is greatly improved with the tree limbs more out of focus. However, I realize the tradeoff you have in time. Using a f/2.8 for instance for good DOF would have only given you a sec or so for the lighting. Probably too short. Was it really dark when you shot this? Any background light hurts you here. The other �distraction� is the lighting of the leaves just beyond the Gonsalves sign. This was probably hard to avoid, but if you did, the photo looks much better.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL � Looks good, no suggestions. It would be interesting to see this in b&w.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO � A really nice shot, probably deserves a slightly higher score. I would think that more practice with light painting, and a better choice of sign without the close in leaves, will give you a much better shot next time.

Jim msp

Stop!
by Jacko

Comment:
Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) � The over composition of the photo is quite good. The sign is well positioned and of appropriate size to draw the eye.
(2) BACKGROUND � Good. Does not intrude on the photo. The sky acts as good negative space. Only minor comment would be on the centered horizon. Impact may have been higher with a lower horizon.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL � Good. Good focus and DOF throughout.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL � This was one of the features that sets your photo apart. An artistic interpretation. The final result really draws the eye to the sign, and reduces the whole background to a secondary part of the photo as you intended. If there is a negative here, it�s that the sign is an off �red.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO � A very nice photo that attempts to differentiate itself from the crowd, and does so. The only major negative, in my opinion, is the color of the sign � should have been more red. But tough to do under the challenge rules. Deserves a much higher score imho.

Jim msp

The city no one calls home
by mariomel

Comment:
Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) � Very good. Sign is placed off center nicely. The city then nicely completes the photo. The relative size of the sign is very good.
(2) BACKGROUND � The city is nicely laid out with respect to the sign. The blue sky acts as good negative space.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL � Focus & DOF look quite good.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL � No real suggestions, looks good to me.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO � Nicely chose sign and composition for the photo. The wording of the sign is humorous and eye catching. The major negative for this challenge would be the position of the sun and the lighting of the sign. The photo should have been taken with more light on the sign. That probably was the one item that cost you in the scoring.

Jim msp