Pelicans à la scrap
by Beetle

Comment:
Cool picture... but non-stationary light source?

Tipsy
by tvsometime

Comment:
Cool, but a little flat & noisy on my monitor.

Cm9add6add4addb9addb5
by leonedavis

Comment:
So far, this is definitely the best use of a non-stationary light source.

Harmony
by sekarmalathy

Comment:
VERY cool shot, but non-stationary light source?

Uke
by LN13

Comment:
VERY cool shot... but non-stationary light source?

The Pier
by Brent_S

Comment:
Great shot (REALLY great shot) but I honestly don't see a non-stationary light source. Does he have a flashlight?

Mid-Summer Day's Dream
by Lydia

Comment:
Very pretty shot. I know how hard it is to get them to land on a pretty flower like that.

Bunt
by karmat

Comment:
I love this shot. I've taken ones just like it before & I think the out of focus ball player looks really cool.

DSC_2372-Edit-Edit2
by Ja-9

Comment:
This... is just really cool, and it doesn't look like you spent hours editing. It just looks natural (other than the desat).

A few general comments:
-What is SEP-2?
-I'm curious as to why you DeNoised twice.
-Do you have Topaz detail? I use it on shots like this, just to bring out a little more of the details in the trees & bricks. If you don't have it, maybe get a trial (or watch a video on youtube.. just search for it).

Really cool place.

DSC_2067-Edit
by Ja-9

Comment:
I think this one is a wow shot, but I'm concerned that the lighting might be too different on monitors. Like I said, on one of my monitors it just doesn't look right at all (it's not calibrated & is a cheap monitor to begin with).

So, I actually think you're safer with the other.