| Author | Thread | 
| Comments Made During the Challenge  | 
		
			|  | 04/07/2002 08:27:00 PM | 
		| | Compression on this photo is way too high. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/06/2002 07:49:00 PM | 
		| | Great composition! What's the fuzziness though? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/06/2002 10:52:00 AM | 
		| | composition would have been better from a lower perspective with the four towers converging at a point above. resolution is a bit poor | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/05/2002 03:03:00 PM | 
		| | neat, wish it was clearer. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/05/2002 01:42:00 AM | 
		|  | 
		
			|  | 04/03/2002 03:28:00 PM | 
		|  | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 10:45:00 PM | 
		|  | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 08:56:00 PM | 
		| | this could have been a better picture if it weren't crooked. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 07:07:00 PM | 
		| | The subject seems interesting, but I think it would have bee incredible without the tilt. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 05:16:00 PM | 
		| | A seemingly grainy image, at a weird angle.  I figure if you have multiple vertical items, the photo shouldn't be crooked.  Just my opinion though. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 04:07:00 PM | 
		| | blurriness is distracting. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 01:48:00 PM | 
		| | either not very well focused or lost a lot of detail due to compression | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 08:06:00 AM | 
		| | almost looks like something out of Star Wars Episode one. A bit on the blurry side. Was this shot from a moving car? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2002 07:43:00 AM | 
		| | Not sure about tye odd angle. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 10:57:00 PM | 
		| | a bit blurry and pixelated; I like the angle; great light; a bit of sky above the point of the highest, er, steeple would be good; | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 05:34:00 PM | 
		| | Too much tilt and a little bit blurry, otherwise I like these "shapes". Is this a monument or something? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 03:13:00 PM | 
		| | The shot is blurry, and the color depth feels kinda flat; probably would have looked better if you were a little farther back to so you could get the right structure fully, and maybe to have a little bit of space around the edges.  (Er.... what language is the title?) | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 12:30:00 PM | 
		| | I am sure the tilt is ment to be but it detracts from this photo in my eye.  Others of course will feel the tilt makes this shot. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 12:20:00 PM | 
		|  | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 11:30:00 AM | 
		| | Massive JPEG artifacs here - your compressed file is only 43Kb - unless you intended this result you need to take advantage of the maximum permissable file size of 150Kb - put a posting in Q & A forum if you are unsure how to do this. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 10:34:00 AM | 
		| | too much jpeg compression, interesting subject | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 07:46:00 AM | 
		| | A good shot but WAY too much jpeg artifacting.  your image is only 43k! next time, use more of the 150k we're allowed. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 07:44:00 AM | 
		| | interesting. too bad the picture is blurry. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 02:05:00 AM | 
		| | Almost, but the JPEG artifacting combined with everything being off-kilter makes it hard to look at. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 01:36:00 AM | 
		| | the focus is too soft, and I'd have tried to get a little more of the right, um... column into the picture. The picture looks really compressed on my screen, too. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/01/2002 12:50:00 AM | 
		| | Sorry, but tilted pictures annoy me to no end! | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 06:18:04 AM EDT.