| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/27/2007 02:50:46 PM |
Originally posted by clp1000:
It's a shame you didn't enter this in the wildlife challenge (running at the same time) because you'd have been looking at a ribbon - fantastic picture |
i agree totaly- definitly a winner. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/25/2007 02:47:25 PM |
| It's a shame you didn't enter this in the wildlife challenge (running at the same time) because you'd have been looking at a ribbon - fantastic picture |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/24/2007 08:55:43 AM |
| Beautiful colors and capture! As stated before, more of a stop action than a motion panning. 32nd out of 128 is a great finish under the circumstances. :) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/24/2007 12:28:23 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
01/23/2007 07:53:28 PM |
| Great capture & colors. Back to bump you up to 8. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/23/2007 04:02:13 PM |
| there's no real motion panning here...the bird looks like it's hovering and the bg is static...great image, but not for this challenge |
|
|
|
01/23/2007 02:40:54 AM |
| Great picture, but this is a Brokeh effect... not blur/motion... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/22/2007 11:54:53 PM |
| While I am sure you were panning to capture this, there really isn't anything to show me there is really any motion. A slightly slower shutter speed or the background being a bit closer would have yielded motion. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/22/2007 11:12:54 PM |
| Great photo, no panning effect. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/22/2007 04:34:34 PM |
| This is more stop action since the background has such bokeh and you can see the lens is not panning. However for a capture of a hawk it is an outstanding shot. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/21/2007 09:50:48 PM |
| Wow, This is my fav. Great Capture |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/21/2007 01:21:19 PM |
| Good shot, though the depth of field becomes a bit of an issue as ever with birds of such a wingspan. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/21/2007 09:03:32 AM |
| Wow. Awesome shot! Unfortunately, it's not motion PANNING and doesn't meet the challenge. |
|
|
|
01/21/2007 05:16:52 AM |
| nice shot but it could be hovering aswell.. no motion here! |
|
|
|
01/21/2007 04:51:53 AM |
| It's a cool shot. But i can't reall see that it's the result of panning (the wings are too sharp for one). It looks just like shallow DoF. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 10:54:57 PM |
| Seems to be more of a DOF picture than a motion blur. Nice pic anyways.. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 09:44:55 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 09:39:50 PM |
| nice capture, but from a dnmc standpoint, the background blur appears to be more from a shallow dof than from panning. who knows, that's just how it appears to me. feel free to ignore me. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 08:25:44 PM |
| Nice sharp photo, but it appears that the effect is more Bokeh then Panning |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/20/2007 02:47:59 PM |
| It sure is a nice capture, but it doesn't look like a motion pan to me? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/19/2007 11:10:23 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/19/2007 08:01:37 PM |
| fantastic photograph ... amazing ... =10 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/19/2007 11:03:30 AM |
| amazing capture of a redtail!8 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 09:32:58 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 08:43:17 PM |
| beautiful image, but is the blurring in the background due to DOF or panning? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 08:02:08 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 07:55:30 PM |
| This photo has a lot going for it. I like the bird, the colors, the light, the nicely out-of-focus background (shallow DOF), but one thing I don't see is evidence of motion panning (where the subject is in focus, and the background has the tell-tale streaks). |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 05:41:29 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 12:05:02 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 10:11:13 AM |
it has probably already been said, but I will say it anyway....this is a good capture of a bird in flight, but the background kust looks like bokeh rather than motion panning.
and that could hurt your score.
I should know, it's hurting mine :-) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 06:35:35 AM |
| That's a nice capture but I don't get any sense of motion to this. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 06:17:21 AM |
| Great pic - but I don't see motion panning... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 05:57:01 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/18/2007 02:11:37 AM |
| where's the blur? nice shot, wrong challenge |
|
|
|
01/17/2007 09:39:15 PM |
| Image quality - 1. Composition - .5. Lighting - 1. Post Processing - 1. Choice of Subject - 1. TOTAL SCORE - 5 |
|
|
|
01/17/2007 07:48:19 PM |
| There's no motion blur here... just regular bokeh. A nice shot, otherwise. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 07:38:05 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 04:34:14 PM |
| Looks more like arrested motion and bokeh. Have to give it 6 for being so damned good. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 04:08:42 PM |
| Great photo, good DOF, but the background doesn't have that motion blur that i think it really needed for this particular challenge. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 04:03:40 PM |
| centered well and great action shot! Gr8. 8 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 03:34:03 PM |
| This appears to be more shallow depth of field than pan... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 03:13:43 PM |
| A good clear shot on the bird, though not a whole lot of evidence of panning. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 02:53:03 PM |
| Beautiful shot, great Bokeh. But I don't see the motion panning ... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 01:58:23 PM |
| Beautiful capture of a beautiful bird. The question for me is whether it shows motion panning or motion capture. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 12:39:17 PM |
Incredibly nice stop action image. Colors, lighting and exposure are right on. (Of course that could be accomplished with RAW image processing from the original. lol!) Nice sharpness and excellent perspective on the hawk.
The image looks to be soft focused rather than motion panned. It does not show much background motion. That is probably because you took it at a fast shutter speed even though you obviously were panning the bird. Some voters will probably fault this fine image for that in this particular challenge. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 12:16:26 PM |
| I would consider this more a bokeh than panning...the photo is exceptional and beautiful, it's hard not to score it high... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 11:12:32 AM |
| looks more like stopped motion shallow dof to me nice moment tho |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 10:23:38 AM |
| Greate picture. Awesome bird in flight. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 09:50:21 AM |
|
|
|
01/17/2007 08:38:38 AM |
doesnt really imply panned motion
more stopped
But a fantastic capture none the less
7 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 07:01:11 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 05:25:37 AM |
| great shot, blurry background, but no sense of motion... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 02:00:29 AM |
| It's a good photo with great DOF, but other than very slight blur on the outer feathers, I don't see any motion blur in the background. |
|
|
|
01/17/2007 01:44:56 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 01:24:19 AM |
| Not really getting a feeling of panning in this shot. Great capture otherwise though. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 12:40:03 AM |
| A wonderful red-tail. Timing is great and colors perfect. Great shot. Van |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
01/17/2007 12:13:41 AM |
| This is a GREAT shot, but it appears to me to be more a shallow DOF shot, rather than the background having been blurred due to motion panning. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
