| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
10/22/2013 11:23:12 PM |
|
|
|
10/22/2013 06:05:54 PM |
(Know that I only vote in even numbers.)
A four for you. Nicely composed, focus and exposure is good. I feel the orientation of the spider is wrong. I want to see a spider head, spider eyes and spider teeth. Well, at least something that looks like a head. |
|
|
|
10/22/2013 11:36:46 AM |
eww, a spider.
quick, kill it with fire!
sorry, natural reaction.
again, eww.
technically, well shot, though i can't see any messages in this web
a 7 from me, and that's generous given the fact that since the spider is so clearly detailed i'd like to just skip it |
|
|
|
10/21/2013 08:04:50 PM |
| I'm afraid it's a little too literal for me. A good try on a hard one though.5. |
|
|
|
10/21/2013 07:28:07 PM |
|
|
|
10/21/2013 12:53:25 PM |
I like the depth of field. I find the brighter line in the background distracting. I'm wondering if it was possible to burn it a bit in processing, or to change your angle when shooting to have avoided that break in the shot.
-5- |
|
|
|
10/21/2013 07:46:43 AM |
| There's a great Charlotte here. Perhaps the web could have been a tad brighter. A 7 from me. |
|
|
|
10/20/2013 09:15:53 PM |
| Every time we get a Garden Orb Spider at our place my daughter names it Charlotte. The focus appears to be nicely on the spider but it doesn’t’ quite feel sharp enough. The background is a little distracting though it does bring in a domesticated feel. I do like the leading lines of the web. 6 |
|
|
|
10/19/2013 01:02:46 PM |
| Poor macro picture. Not a very good angle. 4 |
|
|
|
10/18/2013 11:35:15 PM |
I don't get it...
Oh wait...now I get it.
The idea is good, but it is just a picture of a spider and its web. Nothing jumps out to me and gives me that wow look at that spider. To make it more interesting to me, I would have found a way to get a different background, and I would have tried to get more detail of the spider itself. Now my lenses aren't great, so maybe I wouldn't have been able to do any better myself, but if I could, that is what I would try.
Gave it a 3 |
|
|
|
10/18/2013 10:37:29 PM |
| The shot is topical but the reflection across the upper section disrupts the visual impression. 5 |
|
|
|
10/18/2013 10:30:37 PM |
The background is distracting, and it seems a bit of a fair distance from the subject, so it could have easily been blurred out by normal lenses.
5 |
|
|
|
10/18/2013 12:07:03 PM |
Another one. No water drops, but it looks a bit more farm like, and she has a meal.
6 |
|
|
|
10/18/2013 12:12:22 AM |
| It fits (sic) I hate spiders. It won't hurt your score. |
|
|
|
10/17/2013 11:19:36 PM |
| A worthy book for this shot, or vise versa. Looks like it even has a tasty snack! 7 |
|
|
|
10/17/2013 06:58:46 PM |
This shot is definitely less suitable for the radiance of the novel. I do not like to see here the rear end of this creature that seems in search of food instead of weaving a marvel for our amazement.
5 for the effort |
|
|
|
10/17/2013 10:29:23 AM |
Decent detail. But just a little plain for my liking. Fitting title, however.
Gave it a 3 |
|
|
|
10/17/2013 06:42:56 AM |
| As with the other one with this title,its ok.5. |
|
|
|
10/16/2013 09:55:37 PM |
| Nice crisp detail on the web, and narrow DoF. Wish the background was blurred a little more, but still a well executed image! |
|
|
|
10/16/2013 05:27:27 PM |
| A competent macro shot of a spider, but nothing to hold my interest. 3 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 12:31:12 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
