| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/26/2006 12:43:45 PM · #51 |
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
only song I know by them is radar love. If that is the same band but I may be stupid:) |
yes, same band!
|
|
|
|
08/26/2006 01:25:33 PM · #52 |
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
Originally posted by biteme:
I have to think about the song from The Golden Earring every time I see this thread.. (do you guys know them over there? I have no clue how world-wide-famous they are....)
The devil.. the devil made me dooo it - Ooohooohoohooooo
:D
it's a great song!
ontopic again, sorry Robt ;-) |
only song I know by them is radar love. If that is the same band but I may be stupid:) |
Radar Love was thier biggest hit, for me Don't Call Us We'll Call You was their best.
now - what's up with those 1.6 sensors anyway?
|
|
|
|
08/27/2006 01:21:20 PM · #53 |
70-200mm w/1.4x extender, hand held at 448mm equivalent, 1/80 sec, certainly would be sharper if I did some tripodding. But I love the compression here. Karma's like 8 feet away, the fence like 40-50 feet back... The slight vignetting is added by me, it didn't come from the lens.
R.
|
|
|
|
08/27/2006 01:51:07 PM · #54 |
| If you have a chance, take the Three Capes route out of Tillamook---some beautiful views and the Cape Meares Lighthouse. Then, if you have more time go on down to Yachats/Florence area. There's two lighthouses in Newport (Yaquina Head and Yaquina Bay) and another one at Heceta Head south of Yachats. Some pretty spectacular surf action in the Yachats area. |
|
|
|
08/27/2006 01:51:20 PM · #55 |
The house across the street, 200mm, f/11, 1/30, ISO 100, tripod
Same shot, added 1.4x for 280mm, nothing else changed (camera still zeroed in on same spot)
That's a significant gain in reach. No PP on these except normal sharpening and resizing to 800 pixels. Overcast day today, so the light's not adding any sharpness unfortunately.
R.
|
|
|
|
08/27/2006 10:24:50 PM · #56 |
interesting thread... I was just thinking today to order the 1.4x for my 70-200 f2.8.
Does anyone have some additional examples between having and not having the extender? |
|
|
|
08/28/2006 12:58:51 AM · #57 |
Originally posted by dleach:
interesting thread... I was just thinking today to order the 1.4x for my 70-200 f2.8.
Does anyone have some additional examples between having and not having the extender? |
Your f/2.8 can handle the 2x extender just fine; that's what I'd go for if I had that lens... Gives you 640mm equivalent, at f/5.6 max aperture, drool...
R.
Message edited by author 2006-08-28 01:00:04.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/29/2024 01:41:12 PM EDT.
