DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> Something New II
Pages:  
Showing posts 76 - 100 of 125, (reverse)
AuthorThread
05/10/2004 03:09:00 PM · #76
With the score I got so far... I welcome a DQ. LOL.
05/10/2004 03:15:40 PM · #77
Haha, I am not doing well either, but it's funny someone would DQ it. I look at it and wonder what they saw in it to DQ the photo! Baffling really, but oh well. I've got proof enough.
05/10/2004 03:19:10 PM · #78
I got a DQ request as well. No big deal though because I am completely legit. I am getting slaughtered as well, with a 4.63 and no comments. I think I have hit a rut, hopefully I will pull out soon.
05/10/2004 03:29:01 PM · #79
Looks like I'm in good company. Got my first ever DQ request. Still haven't figure out what prompted it, but at 4.9 its not going to hurt to be DQ'd.
05/10/2004 03:38:55 PM · #80
Originally posted by goinskiing:

I got a DQ request as well. No big deal though because I am completely legit. I am getting slaughtered as well, with a 4.63 and no comments. I think I have hit a rut, hopefully I will pull out soon.


Hey, me too. I was afraid I might although it is completely legit. Not faring well in the ratings, but oh well, I like the picture. Sounds like someone's having fun with DQ requests. Bring 'em on!!
05/10/2004 03:53:51 PM · #81
Folks, relax. The judging just started so wait a day or two for the ratings to stabilize. :) And just fyi, I have about 50 votes and only 6 comments. All I voted as helpful but one portion was sort of iffy and I will PM that person at the end of the challenge. I mean, it's hard to change the shape of the background, right?

As for my shot, it was something far from new, especially the background (it's circa 1930s). So, my take on the challenge was exactly as stated. I took a picture where I've never taken pictures before and it's a subject that's totally new to me. If I get points deducted because it's not a new object or something that suggests new, so be it. I personally liked the resulting photo and I hope others do to.
05/10/2004 04:59:27 PM · #82
My photos are almost always in the upper 4's. I really hope to break the 6 barrier one day. I only have one comment, but usually only get a few. I heard most people don't comment between 4 and 8 usually. Oh well.

My photo is of something as old as the earth itself, but it's new to me since I have never taken pictures there before or of that type of thing (specifically). It was hard to find something I had never taken a photo of, so I had to get very specific as to what that would be. Fun time though!
05/11/2004 08:11:02 AM · #83
Something New II has some great shots - the first one I opened was a 10! I'm scoring the entries exceptionally high. Goes to show that a nudge out of the usual rut can be a great thing.
05/11/2004 09:18:26 AM · #84
I wonder if someone is going through alot of the photos and trying to DQ them? I also got a DQ request and my score is not so hot. I am only getting a 4.8. I am flattered that someone thinks it should be DQ'd though.
05/11/2004 11:05:04 AM · #85
It never even occured to me, reading the challenge, that it was to be a pic of something new. I took it to mean that I should go somewhere I had never taken photos and shoot something I wouldn't normally think to capture. I did that and am heading down with a bang...I found something so far from my usual interests that I was pleased and it printed well but it is not making it in the challenge. Oh well.
05/11/2004 11:17:41 AM · #86
My picture is heading down as well...I took a picture of something that is definitely NOT new, but I read the challenge as many of you did - photograph something you have not entered before in a place you have never taken pictures before. That's exactly what I did. I've had seven wonderful, positive comments, and my score was up at 6.17 last night after 53 votes, but this morning it's going back down...5.97 after 91 votes. Oh well, I like it and it was very different for me. That's what it's all about! :o)
05/11/2004 11:33:36 AM · #87
Originally posted by amsmyth:

It never even occured to me, reading the challenge, that it was to be a pic of something new. I took it to mean that I should go somewhere I had never taken photos and shoot something I wouldn't normally think to capture.


Your assumption was correct. It is meant to be something new to you, not something that is actually new to the world or new to DPC.
05/11/2004 11:43:51 AM · #88
Originally posted by laurielblack:

I've had seven wonderful, positive comments, and my score was up at 6.17 last night after 53 votes, but this morning it's going back down...5.97 after 91 votes. Oh well, I like it and it was very different for me. That's what it's all about! :o)


You're lucky, that's the highest score I've heard so far.
I'm currently hanging on a 5 with 90 votes. Low point of 4.6, high of 5.1. Interesting to watch.
05/11/2004 11:46:28 AM · #89
Originally posted by Zoomdak:

Originally posted by laurielblack:

I've had seven wonderful, positive comments, and my score was up at 6.17 last night after 53 votes, but this morning it's going back down...5.97 after 91 votes. Oh well, I like it and it was very different for me. That's what it's all about! :o)


You're lucky, that's the highest score I've heard so far.
I'm currently hanging on a 5 with 90 votes. Low point of 4.6, high of 5.1. Interesting to watch.


6.38 :)
I know two people in the 7s
05/11/2004 11:46:36 AM · #90
Reading the description of the challenge tells me that this is almost a Free Study type challenge. I can understand when looking at a landscape the disbelief that this is that photographer's first time doing that kind of shot, but I assume that they are telling the truth. I don't see any reason for a "Does not fit the challenge" comment on any shot this week.

I am voting as if all shots fit the theme. Also, there are LOTS of great shots. A couple that are less than OK, but only a couple of 3's, no 2's or 1's so far.

drg
05/11/2004 11:51:43 AM · #91
The paranoia over whether or not an image meets the challenge has more to do with psychology than photography.

It is evident when you take a challenge like this one that is perfectly straightforward but which still generates this much discussion. The interesting part is at the time of judging it is impossible to tell if the challenge was met or not, but you will find people commenting on that anyway.

In the abstract challenge there were probably 15 images better than mine (I was 4th for the GREEN ribbon :) ) that finished lower more or less because mine was viewed as being "more abstract" with a "more abstract" title.

05/11/2004 11:53:53 AM · #92
Originally posted by mirdonamy:

My photos are almost always in the upper 4's. I really hope to break the 6 barrier one day. I only have one comment, but usually only get a few. I heard most people don't comment between 4 and 8 usually. Oh well....


That's a shame that you people are giving you scores less than five without commenting. I'm feeling discouraged because I've had NO comments. Here's my current stats:

Something New II
Votes: 79
Avg Vote: 4.5949
Comments: 0
Updated: 05/11/04 11:45 am

Obviously there's a problem with my photo. I can't blame all those votes on people misinterpreting the guidelines. Of course, I guess at 4.59 (pretty consistent)--wavering b/w 4.60 -ish and 4.54-ish) there are a few people voting 5's who think it's okay technically and just not worth commenting on. I'm not a statitician (I'm not even sure I can spell it!) but there are probably a lot more low votes so c'mon folks, take a moment and tell me why so I can do better next time.

I have to pat myself on the back for voting on [every] entry this time (except my own of course) and commenting on 25 % of those. I still have to go back and leave a few more comments for a couple I scored lower.
05/11/2004 12:05:06 PM · #93
I'm doing pretty good to be me... :)

Votes: 91
Avg Vote: 5.8132
Comments: 10
Updated: 05/11/04 12:01 pm
05/11/2004 12:16:25 PM · #94
Originally posted by stdavidson:

The paranoia over whether or not an image meets the challenge has more to do with psychology than photography.

It is evident when you take a challenge like this one that is perfectly straightforward but which still generates this much discussion. The interesting part is at the time of judging it is impossible to tell if the challenge was met or not, but you will find people commenting on that anyway.

In the abstract challenge there were probably 15 images better than mine (I was 4th for the GREEN ribbon :) ) that finished lower more or less because mine was viewed as being "more abstract" with a "more abstract" title.


When voting on this challenge, I did a thorough background check on everyone before I voted for an image, just to make sure it was something new to them. It's good to work for the FBI. =-)
05/11/2004 12:21:20 PM · #95
Originally posted by fas-ligand:


When voting on this challenge, I did a thorough background check on everyone before I voted for an image, just to make sure it was something new to them. It's good to work for the FBI. =-)


LOL. Good boy! Go get a donut ... :)))


05/11/2004 12:58:53 PM · #96
Originally posted by fas-ligand:


When voting on this challenge, I did a thorough background check on everyone before I voted for an image, just to make sure it was something new to them. It's good to work for the FBI. =-)


And just what did that check on me reveal? :)

For that matter, weren't you afraid that the FBI might check into your case? That might be taking a big chance. :)
05/11/2004 01:02:12 PM · #97
I think most people who enter the member challenges read the 'description of the challenge' pretty well. I feel my votes are based on my photo, not how I met the challenge. I was submitted for DQ and I don't know why. And I think my photo will be DQ'd sadly. I batch all my images to change the file name, but I never thought that would hurt the original. Turns out, it does (since I used Photoshop to do it), and now I am screwed. I don't have a single image taken with a Digital Camera that has not been batched through PS. So, I have "no" original images. I need to find a new method. Sad, so sad. Say goodbye to my photo in Something New II. I'll tell you which one it is once it's DQ'd officially.
05/11/2004 01:53:37 PM · #98
Originally posted by Konador:


6.38 :)
I know two people in the 7s


Well, you and them are probably in the top ten.
Dang people who can always score high. ;< No, just joking, if it weren't for them, there wouldn't be a standard, and it wouldn't be as fun.
05/11/2004 02:00:58 PM · #99
Originally posted by mirdonamy:

I think most people who enter the member challenges read the 'description of the challenge' pretty well. I feel my votes are based on my photo, not how I met the challenge. I was submitted for DQ and I don't know why. And I think my photo will be DQ'd sadly. I batch all my images to change the file name, but I never thought that would hurt the original. Turns out, it does (since I used Photoshop to do it), and now I am screwed. I don't have a single image taken with a Digital Camera that has not been batched through PS. So, I have "no" original images. I need to find a new method. Sad, so sad. Say goodbye to my photo in Something New II. I'll tell you which one it is once it's DQ'd officially.


Bummer! What I do after taking a series of shots is I prune out the ones i don't like, keep the ones I do in a separate folder then make copies of the ones I'm considering for submission for editing and stuff. This way you have an original that's untouched.

Message edited by author 2004-05-11 14:01:55.
05/11/2004 02:33:34 PM · #100
Originally posted by drgsoell:

Reading the description of the challenge tells me that this is almost a Free Study type challenge. I can understand when looking at a landscape the disbelief that this is that photographer's first time doing that kind of shot, but I assume that they are telling the truth. I don't see any reason for a "Does not fit the challenge" comment on any shot this week.


Funny, all my comments are "does not meet" and "I don't belive you didn't take pictures of a ... before". Well not only that I didn't but if I browse the submissions I guess you can say that to everyone. What amazes me always on this site is the amount of paranoya going on. It's like nobody can be trusted, they all cheaters and liars. I wonder what kind of unhappy childhood some had... They all say the shot is verry good so I guess my 5.5 score is only because the subject is so common and nobody belives I never took pictures of it before. Well I didn't. :P
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/17/2025 04:08:56 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/17/2025 04:08:56 PM EDT.