Author | Thread |
|
02/09/2007 12:05:54 PM · #1 |
Is it better to stick to your guns and shoot what you want, or is it okay to shoot something voter friendly to get a higher score, even if you don't much like the style or result ?
Or can you do both and sell out occasionally but take what you like, for yourself...
|
|
|
02/09/2007 12:08:05 PM · #2 |
It is competition man. You want to win shoot what will win. That's not selling out IMO it is competing.
For everything else there is master card. |
|
|
02/09/2007 12:14:11 PM · #3 |
What he said: it's a competition. If you want to be a winner, shoot to score. To the extent that you don't care about winning, shoot to further whatever agenda floats your boat. It's OK to strike a healthy balance between the two; I think I do that. A lot of my entries are doomed, and I am aware of it. Some, I am making an arcane point. Others, I am having fun. Some, I just had a really lousy brain-freeze. And every now and then, I determine it's a good challenge to make a freaking SCORE in, and I go all out to please the voters.
The variety keeps me sane :-)
R.
|
|
|
02/09/2007 12:23:53 PM · #4 |
How would you define "selling out"? |
|
|
02/09/2007 12:31:05 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by pawdrix: How would you define "selling out"? |
Shooting something blatantly commercial and in a genre that doesn't interest you, just because you think it would appeal more to the voters than it might actually appeal to you. I just entered a shot like that - I hope it does well but it leaves me feeling empty when I look at it. Just not a style of photography that I'm interested in any more, other than because it might do well here.
I'm only picking up on the term 'selling out' from the thread about e301's trick cyclist. It probably sounds a whole lot more serious than I actually mean :)
E.g.,
This vs This
One was pandering to the voters, one is an image I actually like and find interesting. The scores are almost exactly the opposite that I'd give them :)
Message edited by author 2007-02-09 12:35:01.
|
|
|
02/09/2007 12:38:59 PM · #6 |
Unless you only shoot for challenges I suspect that mostly you "take what you like, for yourself".
I don't see anything wrong with trying to please the voters either, especially if one is looking for a professional career. After all, a pro has to please his clients to stay in business.
The conflict comes when taking shots for ourselves isn't enough; when we want/need recognition and acceptance of our personal vision.
There are so many photographers out there vying for attention that great ones go unseen unless they are already recognised as good "commercial" photographers. Most galleries, for example, will choose a "name" over an unknown, right?
But if you have to spend all your time and energy on producing what others want, to build up that name, what's left for creating your vision? It would get pretty painful beating your head against the brick wall repeatedly and saying "Look! THIS is what I really want to show you! Can't you SEE? Why won't you take the time to look and think??"
So the tricky part is finding the balance. I guess it's deciding just what's most important to you and how, in the long run, to best achieve that.
edit to add a PS...
Personally, I find what's commonly called "selling out" a challenge in itself; to try, despite my own personal likes and dislikes, to create an image that people will like and connect with.
Message edited by author 2007-02-09 12:42:33. |
|
|
02/09/2007 12:47:13 PM · #7 |
Woody Allen once said (to paraphrase) given the option of making an enduring movie classic and a boatload of money Hollywood will always go for the money.
I'd like to think, that I myself would choose to make an enduring classic.
I enter because the Challenges give me something to shoot, they get me out there and watching the score is a pleasant diversion from the daily routines. I never expect to win and even if I tried really hard I'm not sure I could pull it off.
Selling out to me would be, if I knew, for certain that DPC voters went crazy over Times Square Fisheye shots and I entered them all the time, to get Ribbons. If could be doing something more challenging, that pushes, moves or shakes, I would say that I was compromising myself.
BeeCee, makes a great point point when she mentions "want or need of recognition or acceptance" and Bear's "healthy balance" makes the most sense.
Message edited by author 2007-02-09 12:54:13. |
|
|
02/09/2007 12:53:49 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by pawdrix: Woody Allen once said (to paraphrase) given the option of making an enduring movie classic and a boatload of money Hollywood will always go for the money.
I'd like to think, that I myself would choose to make an enduring classic.
|
Wouldn't the real trick to be to make an enduring movie classic that makes a boatload of money ?
By the same token, is it only selling out if my image actually does well ? Check back next week to see that I didn't really sell out at all and the voters still don't understand me ? ;)
|
|
|
02/09/2007 12:59:49 PM · #9 |
I think there is another aspect here. When you work outside of what you typically shoot, or outside of your comfort level; it challenges you to think more, it keeps you from getting lazy, and you often learn something valuable. It is often the things that you don't want to do that have the greatest impact on your growth. |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:06:51 PM · #10 |
I do think that if once Wayne Gretzky would have had the occasion of pushing the puck with is stick into the goal and score while lying down on the ice he would have done it. I can't imagine him saying to a journalist, "this was not the kind of goal I like to score so I just passed on it." |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:08:10 PM · #11 |
If I see a challenge that inspires me I will shoot what my inner muse compels me too. If my photograph strikes a chord and makes a connection to the/my audience that is a bonus. Point is, I don't enter a challenge JUST for the sake of entering or entering because it will score exceptionally high. A challenge will have to strike a chord with me that I would make the effort to pick up my camera and shoot. My top three reasons on entering a challenge are I enter to challenge myself (by learning/trying new things), to take inspiration from the various challenges that come up here at this site, and listen to feedback (the good and the bad) from my peers.
I am very critical of my work so it first has to pass muster with me before I will submit here. Once I deem my photograph as high calibre work that passes my standards I am most interested to hear feedback from my peers on what they think, likes & dislikes, pros & cons, and what can be improved.
For me 'selling out' would be not to listen to my inner muse and shoot for the mass audience appeal. I have to like it before I will post it.
Edit: Oh, and I forgot to mention having fun helps too:-)
Message edited by author 2007-02-09 13:12:40. |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:15:22 PM · #12 |
What about those of us who can't get into the top 50 to save our lives? Is trying to score a ribbon "selling out" if you're not capable?
The concept of "selling out" is an insult invented by punk bands who don't like other punk bands to experience commercial success. It's a crock, IMHO. If trying to win ribbons happens to please my inner muse, who has the right to say that I'm selling out?
And besides, I'm not capable of winning ribbons, so how could I sell out? |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:16:33 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by nicklevy: I do think that if once Wayne Gretzky would have had the occasion of pushing the puck with is stick into the goal and score while lying down on the ice he would have done it. I can't imagine him saying to a journalist, "this was not the kind of goal I like to score so I just passed on it." |
...but he was being paid millions of dollars to win, any way he could.
If your only goal is to win by all means, win but some people would like to accomplish more than that, I'd assume. There is more than winning. As Bear said...his agenda changes, as it goes. I'd love to win but it doesn't out muscle my desire to spend time or effort on shooting (or trying to shoot) enduring images.
So what do we as individuals really want to accomplish?
Message edited by author 2007-02-09 13:31:39. |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:27:53 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by nards656:
The concept of "selling out" is an insult invented by punk bands who don't like other punk bands to experience commercial success. It's a crock, IMHO. If trying to win ribbons happens to please my inner muse, who has the right to say that I'm selling out?
|
I think it was Jazz musicians originally. Anyway, you at least have the right to say that you are selling out, don't you ?
|
|
|
02/09/2007 01:29:51 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
I think it was Jazz musicians originally. Anyway, you at least have the right to say that you are selling out, don't you ? |
You're prolly right; it just seems to show up most these days with punkers.
And yes, if "I" consider myself to be selling out, perhaps that is exactly what it is. True selling out, though, usually involves money, and starving photogs definitely need that.... |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:30:12 PM · #16 |
If dpc were the end-all, be-all of my photography, then shooting for the voters would be "selling out." However, if I want to win a ribbon, or score highly, then it is meeting a goal by meeting a certain criteria. Akin, I think, to working for hire.
To me, it is selling out when dpc's "standards" become my overall measure of worth for a picture. |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:40:05 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by Gordon: Is it better to stick to your guns and shoot what you want, or is it okay to shoot something voter friendly to get a higher score, even if you don't much like the style or result ?
Or can you do both and sell out occasionally but take what you like, for yourself... |
I just abstain from challenges where the topic doesn't mean I can shoot something I like that will also [hopefully] appeal to the DPC crowd. I can't see spending time shooting stuff just for a high(er) DPC score or ribbon. *yawn*
|
|
|
02/09/2007 01:42:20 PM · #18 |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:48:37 PM · #19 |
I think it's a challenge in itself not to sell out to the pervasive and uniform commercialism that is so very nearly becoming our end-all and be-all (to use karmat's term). |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:53:13 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by karmat: If dpc were the end-all, be-all of my photography, then shooting for the voters would be "selling out." However, if I want to win a ribbon, or score highly, then it is meeting a goal by meeting a certain criteria. Akin, I think, to working for hire.
To me, it is selling out when dpc's "standards" become my overall measure of worth for a picture. |
Exactly! |
|
|
02/09/2007 01:59:18 PM · #21 |
i'm not sure if it possible to "sell out" for a virtual ribbon ;)
thou i agree if THIS (DPC) is your "life" you might try harder
|
|
|
02/09/2007 02:07:46 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: What he said: it's a competition. If you want to be a winner, shoot to score. To the extent that you don't care about winning, shoot to further whatever agenda floats your boat. It's OK to strike a healthy balance between the two; I think I do that. A lot of my entries are doomed, and I am aware of it. Some, I am making an arcane point. Others, I am having fun. Some, I just had a really lousy brain-freeze. And every now and then, I determine it's a good challenge to make a freaking SCORE in, and I go all out to please the voters.
The variety keeps me sane :-)
R. |
Well, I'm no ribbon winner but have to concur with Bear. My highest-scoring image I knew was exceptionally dpc-friendly. And for the last ten or so challenges before I click the "submit" button, I do a little estimate of its probable score. Those guesses have been remarkably close to the final score, and whether low or reasonably good I am satisfied. My "bad" entry is rather edgy in terms of voters getting what might equal bad about it, but I'm happy with the comments because ALL of those people "got it". I submitted my best of '06 because it was eye candy rather than other shots i liked better from the year. Same deal, guessed the score and was happy enough.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 06:50:56 PM EDT.