| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/28/2006 09:16:01 PM · #1 |
Stop email me saying how disappointed you are that I did not meet the challenge...there is no difference in these two pictures..!!
Challenge picture 6sec
Edit: levels could be - + difference on the top picture. |
|
|
|
03/28/2006 09:17:55 PM · #2 |
I like your photo a lot....gave it an 8.
Nice work man.
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 09:17:57 PM · #3 |
They're close, but the entered image is significantly better than the 2-second one IMO.
R.
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 09:24:21 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by philup:
...there is no difference in these two pictures..!!
|
No difference implies that you submitted the 6sec shot just to flaunt the rules.
bazz.
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 09:27:34 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by sir_bazz:
Originally posted by philup:
...there is no difference in these two pictures..!!
|
No difference implies that you submitted the 6sec shot just to flaunt the rules.
bazz. |
Read his comments on the shot.
Not saying agreee or not...but he had his reasons. |
|
|
|
03/28/2006 09:28:47 PM · #6 |
i think they're both gorgeous...and think that the true 2 second one is a tad better... and IN MY OPINION anyone who says negative things is just jealous that their photos didn't do as well.
I would report any pms or emails to SC that are extreme..
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 09:40:59 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Di:
i think they're both gorgeous...and think that the true 2 second one is a tad better... and IN MY OPINION anyone who says negative things is just jealous that their photos didn't do as well. |
I didn't enter the challenge so does that still apply:-) Each to their own but I don't need to agree it should have been entered and I don't need to agree that it's good for the site.
Originally posted by Di:
I would report any pms or emails to SC that are extreme.. |
I agree, there is no need for that. |
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:48:45 PM · #8 |
Jealous? You're dammed right I'm jealous. I tried and tried to get a decent 2 sec shot but they all sucked. My 6 - 10 second shots of sky were much better but I couldn't/didn't use them.
...now looking back, maybe I should have!
KS
Originally posted by Di:
i think they're both gorgeous...and think that the true 2 second one is a tad better... and IN MY OPINION anyone who says negative things is just jealous that their photos didn't do as well.
I would report any pms or emails to SC that are extreme.. |
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 10:57:19 PM · #9 |
| I like the clarity of the 6sec challenge pic. Would've voted it higher. |
|
|
|
03/28/2006 11:09:34 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
They're close, but the entered image is significantly better than the 2-second one IMO.
R. |
agreed!
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 11:11:25 PM · #11 |
While I do not agree with the submissions that were longer or shorter than 2 seconeds, I also do not agtree with people PMing or emailing others regarding this. It seem a bit extrmeme to me to go through looking up who didnt follow the detils of the challenge just to tell them how wrong they were.
By the way, I voted your image high (9) as I really liked the scene. Yes, I was disappointed to see you had not truly shot it in 2 seconds, but that is irrelevant at this point. Your 2 second shot is not as clear, but also is good enough that I would have still rated it high.
|
|
|
|
03/28/2006 11:26:50 PM · #12 |
I gave the image you entered an 8. The 2 second one would have received a 4 or 5. That's just me. I am sure hundreds of other voters would have done similar. The 2 second shot is bland and lacks contrast and definition. The 6 second shot is near perfect in exposure.
If they were both the same, why didn't you enter the 2 second one?
|
|
|
|
03/29/2006 06:28:38 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by hotpasta:
I gave the image you entered an 8. The 2 second one would have received a 4 or 5. That's just me. I am sure hundreds of other voters would have done similar. The 2 second shot is bland and lacks contrast and definition. The 6 second shot is near perfect in exposure.
If they were both the same, why didn't you enter the 2 second one? |
Did you not read my comments under my picture????
|
|
|
|
03/29/2006 01:40:15 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by philup:
Did you not read my comments under my picture???? |
You say that like it's a pass. It's like Dale Earhart Jr. saying I'm sorry I placed the wrong restrictor plate on my carb before the race. I hope you overlook it and let me keep my 1st place finish.
This is going around and around in various forums - the 2 second rule. Let me point out that I did not submit a photo in the challenge so I'm not speak from a stand point of jealousy.
I understand your mistake and had you missed the deadline because you had to redo your photograph, I would have sympathized with you.
It's a sad state of affairs when challenge descriptions have to be outlined in court document form in 'Extra Rules' because people seem to think that details such as time being subjective to interpretation.
Had I known that the Tv was 6 seconds, I would have voted much lower than the 8 I did.
-Rick |
|
|
|
03/29/2006 02:14:01 PM · #15 |
Is this horse dead or can it be beaten further?
And yes the 6 sec shot is better, if that is your editing or not, I certainly can't say. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/18/2025 06:36:59 PM EDT.
