| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/25/2006 01:57:09 PM · #851 |
.
Message edited by author 2006-03-28 23:45:09.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 02:27:52 PM · #852 |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:02:21 PM · #853 |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:35:29 PM · #854 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
So Kiwinesss would have to beat a 6.73 and I'd have to top 6.26 for our entries to count at all? I'm not loving that idea (except for Kiwi of course). |
Agree 100%, It´s not easy to get a 6+ score and even though I think Gary can pull out 7+ scores pretty easily, it´s kindof silly to expect him to do that at a drop of a hat, same goes for you Shannon, I really admire your work and think you are one of the best here but I really can´t see you pulling out 7+ scores just like that, I think you have to work as hard as the rest of us to do that... |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:43:37 PM · #855 |
I know this is probably a trial for the WPL so I'm happy to go with whatever rules that are decided.
One thing that should be determined is how is the wildcard entry decided or who decides.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:45:26 PM · #856 |
Originally posted by keegbow:
I know this is probably a trial for the WPL so I'm happy to go with whatever rules that are decided.
One thing that should be determined is how is the wildcard entry decided or who decides. |
Put names on dart board throw dart? :-)
Message edited by author 2006-03-25 15:45:53.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:46:11 PM · #857 |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:48:19 PM · #858 |
Wildcard is the top-scoring non-winning team isn't it?
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:49:15 PM · #859 |
I guess. I was just making a joke.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:52:24 PM · #860 |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 03:52:58 PM · #861 |
I think the majority has voted for taking the top 4 Photographer averages and dividing it by 4. If thats ok I will amend the rule.
-sdw
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:01:26 PM · #862 |
Originally posted by southern_exposure:
I think the majority has voted for taking the top 4 Photographer averages and dividing it by 4. If thats ok I will amend the rule.
-sdw |
I say give that more time for discussion today. Let more see the post.
Just my $.02
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:07:47 PM · #863 |
Originally posted by Konador:
I reckon take the top four, or keep it as it is. I don't really like the idea of dropping the highest. |
i agree.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:15:14 PM · #864 |
Originally posted by joynim:
Wazz made me do it! |
LOL! Yes I have that POWER!
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:28:02 PM · #865 |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:28:09 PM · #866 |
Test Complete... :-)
Message edited by author 2006-03-25 16:51:32.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:31:24 PM · #867 |
I'm not fussed and will happily go with whatever the majority are comfortable with.
bazz.
Message edited by author 2006-03-25 17:01:18.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:34:39 PM · #868 |
If your testing your signatures. Do the following:
1. Make sure you have the signature box checked below your post before you post.
2. If it doesn't work, make your changes and edit your previous post and it should update.
Thanks
Forum code to link your signature logo to your Team page. Just replace the info below with yours. NO SPACES!
[ url=//www.website.com/path/to/fullsizepage.html][ img]//www.website.com/path/to/thumbnail.jpg[/img][/url]
Message edited by author 2006-03-25 16:38:19.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 04:56:07 PM · #869 |
| Top four averaged is my preference. |
|
|
|
03/25/2006 05:03:13 PM · #870 |
The result calculations each week is going to be a hell of a lot of work, who will be doing this? TomFoolery the OP or who? Respect to whoever it is, you must have a lot of time on your hands!
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 05:05:39 PM · #871 |
Is the score for each team going to just be an average of the four highest scores? And if so, why not have each team have one member calculate the average score for their team and submit it to southern_exposure to post on the site?
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 05:14:41 PM · #872 |
Originally posted by kiwiness:
The result calculations each week is going to be a hell of a lot of work, who will be doing this? TomFoolery the OP or who? Respect to whoever it is, you must have a lot of time on your hands! |
I will be doing the calculations. I have a database for the calculations. I'm just having to update it because of the extra two teams and the rules change.
BTW: The rules have been amended for view on WPL site. The rules change was to do with the top 4 avg / 4 and DQ's.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 05:18:13 PM · #873 |
Originally posted by southern_exposure:
BTW: The rules have been amended for view on WPL site. The rules change was to do with the top 4 avg / 4 and DQ's. |
It still says 5 teams if you care. Not a biggie though.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 05:20:44 PM · #874 |
Originally posted by danderson107:
Originally posted by southern_exposure:
BTW: The rules have been amended for view on WPL site. The rules change was to do with the top 4 avg / 4 and DQ's. |
It still says 5 teams if you care. Not a biggie though. |
ahhhhhhh, I thought I changed that. I will do it now. Thanks/.
|
|
|
|
03/25/2006 05:20:50 PM · #875 |
Look what Judi did! Thanks Judi you ROCK!
Message edited by author 2006-03-25 17:26:18.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/28/2025 02:07:58 PM EDT.
