Author | Thread |
|
11/04/2014 09:28:17 AM · #1 |
So do you think titles need to be longer now that the pictures are wider? |
|
|
11/04/2014 09:48:33 AM · #2 |
Given that thumbs are still the same size, longer titles might eat up more of the already scarce 'white space' on the home page :-( |
|
|
11/04/2014 10:01:59 AM · #3 |
Why can't they resize them for thumbs? My title looks so tiny. I don't like it. :)Originally posted by skewsme: Given that thumbs are still the same size, longer titles might eat up more of the already scarce 'white space' on the home page :-( |
|
|
|
11/04/2014 11:28:52 AM · #4 |
I hardly ever read the titles.
sorry -- I don't mean to ignore them. But I'm into the photos and just forget they're there. most of the time, I end up looking at the title if I don't get the picture or don't understand it's relevancy to the topic. Then: "That's right! There's a title; maybe that will give me a clue..."
I hate having to come up with a title, as well. I really wish we could leave it blank. (Untitled strikes people as lazy. And I think it's different, actually, than leaving it blank.) |
|
|
11/04/2014 12:27:21 PM · #5 |
FYI, my question was meant as a joke, kind of... except that a one word title does look a bit lost under there:)
I like titles... most of the time.
I like the photographs better though, hopefully. |
|
|
11/04/2014 12:46:51 PM · #6 |
Most of Bear's titles take advantage of all that space :) |
|
|
11/04/2014 01:05:05 PM · #7 |
ha. I seem to remember Bear's wanting all titles to be the same, something like afterbath. sorry, I must have a cold. |
|
|
11/04/2014 02:10:47 PM · #8 |
I want to be able to have carriage returns!! |
|
|
11/04/2014 05:06:01 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Most of Bear's titles take advantage of all that space :) |
"MOST"? No way! *Many*? I'll accept that :-) |
|
|
11/04/2014 05:07:19 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by tnun: ha. I seem to remember Bear's wanting all titles to be the same, something like afterbath. sorry, I must have a cold. |
Pfooey on you! :-) *I* didn't come up with that challenge idea or its description, don't hang it on ME... Blame that guy >>>> over there, what's-his-name... |
|
|
11/04/2014 05:33:21 PM · #11 |
and who made all those titular comments? |
|
|
11/04/2014 08:25:03 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by tnun: and who made all those titular comments? |
It was my hope that the recipients of the comments would understand why their images weren't doing as well as they expected. I didn't actually hammer anyone in the voting for their titles, but it was obvious it was happening from messages I was getting before I even voted. I guess it wasn't a good idea to make those comments, but I meant well :-( |
|
|
11/04/2014 08:42:53 PM · #13 |
tnun said "titular". *giggles in a 5-year-old way*
|
|
|
11/04/2014 09:01:54 PM · #14 |
oh dear. I fear have cause Bear to titubate. |
|
|
11/04/2014 09:36:05 PM · #15 |
Was C2K announced before or after the new size limits? Do I submit a 1200 or 800 pixel image?
Message edited by author 2014-11-04 21:44:32. |
|
|
11/04/2014 09:45:06 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by markwiley: Was C2K announced before or after the new size limits? Do I submit a 1200 or 800 pixel image? |
1200 |
|
|
11/04/2014 10:16:57 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by markwiley: Was C2K announced before or after the new size limits? Do I submit a 1200 or 800 pixel image? |
No, Mark, you submit NO image. Thought we made that clear? ;) |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:03:16 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by pamb: Originally posted by markwiley: Was C2K announced before or after the new size limits? Do I submit a 1200 or 800 pixel image? |
No, Mark, you submit NO image. Thought we made that clear? ;) |
Thanks, Pam. |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:09:25 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by markwiley: Originally posted by pamb: Originally posted by markwiley: Was C2K announced before or after the new size limits? Do I submit a 1200 or 800 pixel image? |
No, Mark, you submit NO image. Thought we made that clear? ;) |
Thanks, Pam. |
No problem. All part of the service. |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:12:31 PM · #20 |
Good thing I picked up on this challenge two hours ago. That gives me lots of time...not. |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:41:02 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by tnun: oh dear. I fear have cause Bear to titubate. |
Actually, he was hyperventilating... A titration of 151-proof rum helped even things out... |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:41:56 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: Good thing I picked up on this challenge two hours ago. That gives me lots of time...not. |
How much time do you NEED to pick an image at random and enter it, then wait for your ribbon? |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:46:00 PM · #23 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by DrAchoo: Good thing I picked up on this challenge two hours ago. That gives me lots of time...not. |
How much time do you NEED to pick an image at random and enter it, then wait for your ribbon? |
He's actually only ever taken 308 photos. He's extremely efficient. |
|
|
11/04/2014 11:56:46 PM · #24 |
You guys are sooo funny, but I'll take it as a compliment. :) You may be surprised what I chose to enter. Not sure how it will do. I 'm pretty rusty at this challenge business... |
|
|
11/05/2014 07:47:24 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: You guys are sooo funny, but I'll take it as a compliment. :) You may be surprised what I chose to enter. Not sure how it will do. I 'm pretty rusty at this challenge business... |
I wouldn't mind your level of rustiness. :) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/09/2025 12:37:15 PM EDT.