Author | Thread |
|
10/03/2010 07:52:39 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by JH: Originally posted by Bear_Music: I have posted 7 images in the 3's... This one, entered in "self portrait", had the worst score at 3.4xxx... |
That one still really bugs you, doesn't it? ;-) |
No, actually. I kind of enjoy that it is what it is. I hope it continues to be my lowest-scoring image ever. Though I am entering a macro that could do even worse :-)
R. |
|
|
10/03/2010 07:54:58 PM · #27 |
[thumb]//www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=849724[/thumb] |
|
|
10/03/2010 08:04:43 PM · #28 |
3.2913
I didn't understand the concept of complementary colors, LOL! Black & white were in my crayon box and I was thinking more along the lines of opposite colors. Still, at least my pp skills have improved a tad since then. |
|
|
10/03/2010 08:18:28 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by iamwoman: |
|
|
|
10/03/2010 08:31:09 PM · #30 |
|
|
10/03/2010 08:34:18 PM · #31 |
I am SO loving everyone's contributions. Incredible how so many excellent images scored so low, and how many low-scoring images are avant-garde, misunderstood art. |
|
|
10/03/2010 08:37:35 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by LydiaToo: Originally posted by iamwoman: | |
How is it you have THREE images over 7 and no ribbon!!!/??? Mind-boggling. |
|
|
10/03/2010 08:44:27 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by tanguera: by charliebaker. It scored a breathtaking 2.0872. I can only dream to one day approach this greatness. |
Something that stood out to me when viewing this image:
Views during voting: 525
Votes: 254
Comments: 59 (52 during the challenge!)
The most comments I've received on one of mine is currently 7, and that's my highest-rated image. Was the site that much more active in 2006 than it is now, or is there something else going on? :) |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:00:57 PM · #34 |
HAH!!! Amateurs!!! Cast your eyes upon true mediocrity
Place: 443 out of 443
Avg (all users): 3.1307
Avg (commenters): 2.8000
Avg (participants): 3.0490
Avg (non-participants): 3.2165
Message edited by author 2010-10-03 21:03:14. |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:08:09 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by LydiaToo: Originally posted by iamwoman: | |
How is it you have THREE images over 7 and no ribbon!!!/??? Mind-boggling. |
I never sit with the popular kids at lunch - GRIN!
You'll find me with the alternative types hanging on the lawns, behind the sheds, in the side challenges. Oh and my kids don't draw the big crowds (unless I'm copying goodman), - we're apparently not DPC friendly enough - maybe my accent gets in the way??? |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:10:14 PM · #36 |
charliebaker's image isn't the lowest scoring ever, you know. |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:13:08 PM · #37 |
2.89, and I wasn't even trying |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:14:36 PM · #38 |
also, I have 38 images that have scored under 4. That's gotta be a tough one to beat. |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:16:00 PM · #39 |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:18:03 PM · #40 |
and 89 for whiterook, he truly is the master |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:45:21 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy: charliebaker's image isn't the lowest scoring ever, you know. |
I suck at site searches. If there is an even lower score, please, do post!!! |
|
|
10/03/2010 09:45:22 PM · #42 |
=P |
|
|
10/03/2010 10:11:46 PM · #43 |
My lowest score...to date:
4.6463
And, of course, it would have to happen during the DPL.
The comments were very nice and helpful, though. |
|
|
10/03/2010 10:17:39 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by K10DGuy: charliebaker's image isn't the lowest scoring ever, you know. |
I suck at site searches. If there is an even lower score, please, do post!!! |
I'll do better, I'll teach you how to look:
Under "Photos" at the top right of the page, click on "browse". Then look on the left hand side of the page that comes up. You'll see different categories. In these categories will be "Lowest Rated". Click on that to find the lowest scoring images. Click on other categories to see what's in those too, whenever you wish. |
|
|
10/03/2010 10:19:12 PM · #45 |
3.69 and I was serious
 |
|
|
10/03/2010 10:26:41 PM · #46 |
One of my favorite shots and my all time lowest
4.7375, and I seriously thought this would have scored higher. |
|
|
10/03/2010 10:50:15 PM · #47 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by K10DGuy: charliebaker's image isn't the lowest scoring ever, you know. |
I suck at site searches. If there is an even lower score, please, do post!!! |
This is the one that charliebaker mentioned in his notes. It was so long ago that it only has 4 digits in the image number.
My current free study may be my lowest.
ETA That one may have scored in the dumpster, but it got some interestingly comical comments during voting. People didn't know what to make of it at all.
Message edited by author 2010-10-03 22:53:43.
|
|
|
10/03/2010 11:46:11 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by MelonMusketeer: Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by K10DGuy: charliebaker's image isn't the lowest scoring ever, you know. |
I suck at site searches. If there is an even lower score, please, do post!!! |
This is the one that charliebaker mentioned in his notes. It was so long ago that it only has 4 digits in the image number.
My current free study may be my lowest.
ETA That one may have scored in the dumpster, but it got some interestingly comical comments during voting. People didn't know what to make of it at all. |
Impressive!!!! 176 1s!!
@ K10DGuy - thank you!! |
|
|
10/03/2010 11:47:34 PM · #49 |
|
|
10/03/2010 11:53:37 PM · #50 |
Maybe it was just so bad that they only gave it 4 digits for it's image number. It's a true classic among giants.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/23/2025 10:22:24 AM EDT.