| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/18/2010 03:53:22 AM · #151 |
Originally posted by Jac:
In my opinion this challenge served as a still life study rather than a challenge to produce an image of something that no longer works as it once did. Just plopping down an old watch onto an interesting background and lighting it appropriately, to me, doesn't meet the challenge goal. I'm not targeting a particular image btw. An old rusty car with flat tires in a field of weeds clearly shows that the car isn't in working condition and to me, this meets the challenge theme.
If we're going to over-simplify the challenges then all the challenges will become free studies and pointless. |
Good point. |
|
|
|
01/18/2010 08:16:09 AM · #152 |
Originally posted by Jac:
In my opinion this challenge served as a still life study rather than a challenge to produce an image of something that no longer works as it once did. Just plopping down an old watch onto an interesting background and lighting it appropriately, to me, doesn't meet the challenge goal. I'm not targeting a particular image btw. An old rusty car with flat tires in a field of weeds clearly shows that the car isn't in working condition and to me, this meets the challenge theme.
If we're going to over-simplify the challenges then all the challenges will become free studies and pointless. |
??? No disrepect intended here but your point, "still life study...with an interesting background and lighting", could easily be applied to the image you entered. Yes/No?
 |
|
|
|
01/18/2010 09:15:49 AM · #153 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by Jac:
In my opinion this challenge served as a still life study rather than a challenge to produce an image of something that no longer works as it once did. Just plopping down an old watch onto an interesting background and lighting it appropriately, to me, doesn't meet the challenge goal. I'm not targeting a particular image btw. An old rusty car with flat tires in a field of weeds clearly shows that the car isn't in working condition and to me, this meets the challenge theme.
If we're going to over-simplify the challenges then all the challenges will become free studies and pointless. |
??? No disrepect intended here but your point, "still life study...with an interesting background and lighting", could easily be applied to the image you entered. Yes/No?
|
The point, right or wrong, was the voters needed to see evidence the subject of the photo no longer worked as intended. I think this example fully meets that goal. Why don't you think so? |
|
|
|
01/18/2010 09:23:08 AM · #154 |
Originally posted by Gatorguy:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by Jac:
In my opinion this challenge served as a still life study rather than a challenge to produce an image of something that no longer works as it once did. Just plopping down an old watch onto an interesting background and lighting it appropriately, to me, doesn't meet the challenge goal. I'm not targeting a particular image btw. An old rusty car with flat tires in a field of weeds clearly shows that the car isn't in working condition and to me, this meets the challenge theme.
If we're going to over-simplify the challenges then all the challenges will become free studies and pointless. |
??? No disrepect intended here but your point, "still life study...with an interesting background and lighting", could easily be applied to the image you entered. Yes/No?
|
The point, right or wrong, was the voters needed to see evidence the subject of the photo no longer worked as intended. I think this example fully meets that goal. Why don't you think so? |
Actually I like Jac's photo and gave it a high score (see this thread) - I think that his photo is very close to the scenario described (with a simple still life). |
|
|
|
01/18/2010 10:07:55 AM · #155 |
Barry, if you remove my image from the context of this challenge you still see an object that will not work as it once did. If you remove that watch image I mentioned, and I have to say again that I'm not targeting any particular image, and view it out of context to this challenge then all I see is a still life of an old watch. That's the only point I'm trying to make here. I'm not trying to twist anyones perception of how a challenge should be interpreted. To show the viewer that something isn't working as it once did you need to show me the why and how it doesn't work as it once did. Photographing it and then telling me through the forum that it's broken or giving me a descriptive title doesn't cut it for me. It's the photograph that needs to get that message across, not the title or the already mentioned forum thread.
Oh and thanks for the mention in the Posthumous thread. :)
Message edited by author 2010-01-18 10:09:55. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/22/2025 05:58:24 AM EDT.
