| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/17/2009 12:26:57 AM · #801 |
You are just to good to me  chromeydome. Thanks so much!!!! |
|
|
|
02/17/2009 12:48:25 AM · #802 |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 12:05:19 AM · #803 |
I'd like to nominiate this image from the apple II challenge for one of the awards:
 |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 12:24:18 AM · #804 |
Originally posted by bob350:
I'd like to nominiate this image from the apple II challenge for one of the awards:
|
We don't "nominate" in here, it's a thread where individuals create theirown awards and then pass them out as they see fit. Go ahead and make your own little GIFs and have at it :-)
R.
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 12:33:24 AM · #805 |
Originally posted by bob350:
I'd like to nominiate this image from the apple II challenge for one of the awards:
|
If I gave out awards, it would get the highest one from me, that's for sure. It's about 400,000 times above anything else in the challenge, in creativity, presentation, and emotion.
Actually, I think starting with this image, I'm going to start a new thing.
K10D's Komment of the Week. Awarded to my favorite image from all three challenges during each week, a K10DGuy comment.
Now, I just need a .gif. Any artists out there want to help me out with that? |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 01:48:51 AM · #806 |
In Apple II the Order of the Thumb
is awarded to  oscarthepig
for this:
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:15:23 AM · #807 |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 07:58:35 AM · #808 |
Thanks. I appreciate it. I suppose this means I should abandon all hope of my work being accepted by the DPC masses, though (not that that's a bad thing). lol |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 07:17:34 PM · #809 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
.... I'm going to start a new thing.
K10D's Komment of the Week. Awarded to my favorite image from all three challenges during each week, a K10DGuy comment.
Now, I just need a .gif. Any artists out there want to help me out with that? |
Hmmm. I'm thinking of a Col Klink headshot with a "Herr Kommendandt" title :-) |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 07:21:54 PM · #810 |
PostLUMINOUS Awards for Apple:
my top four votes in this challenge:
The Nominees:
  DiKrog   izadoodle  PennyStreet
and each get the  PostLuminous Nomination
another tie:
The PostLumie goes to:
 posthumous  goinskiing
The  winners |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 08:03:13 PM · #811 |
Thanks chromeydome! I am honored.
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 08:13:40 PM · #812 |
Thank you for the nomination and the comment...
|
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:26:17 AM · #813 |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:32:53 AM · #814 |
That's very nice, thanx. The voters sure didn't appreciate it much :-(
R.
|
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:38:02 AM · #815 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
That's very nice, thanx. The voters sure didn't appreciate it much :-(R. |
It's pretty much a given that abstracts tend to do poorly in a non-abstract challenge. You already know that I liked your entry, though. |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:40:52 AM · #816 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
That's very nice, thanx. The voters sure didn't appreciate it much :-(
R. |
I struggled to find words for a comment on your image. But I really liked it. |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:41:57 AM · #817 |
| hey team sucker - 5.7 is not a shabby score! |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:42:09 AM · #818 |
Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
That's very nice, thanx. The voters sure didn't appreciate it much :-(R. |
It's pretty much a given that abstracts tend to do poorly in a non-abstract challenge. You already know that I liked your entry, though. |
Yah. I went in there knowing it was gonna be an Origami challenge. I bought a ton of post-its and did a lot of folding, but my heart wasn't in it. On the other hand, I *loved" my entry (still do for that matter)...
R.
|
|
|
|
02/23/2009 12:45:26 AM · #819 |
Originally posted by skewsme:
hey team sucker - 5.7 is not a shabby score! |
It's clean, sharp, strikingly well lit, and original in concept, and it barely finished above the middle of the pack... I'm not complaining (not much anyway), I'm just saying... That's pretty much an absolutely straight-from-camera image, btw...
R.
|
|
|
|
02/23/2009 01:11:50 AM · #820 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by skewsme:
hey team sucker - 5.7 is not a shabby score! |
It's clean, sharp, strikingly well lit, and original in concept, and it barely finished above the middle of the pack... I'm not complaining (not much anyway), I'm just saying... That's pretty much an absolutely straight-from-camera image, btw...
R. |
Well, it got a 6 from me, but I thought it would have benefited greatly by a square crop. The length of the portrait crop diverted my attention from the geometry of the post-it notes, and turned it into more of a photograph of the vertical blinds.
As for the 'origami', man, I couldn't agree more. Most of the origami shots got a static 6 from me. My standard "yah, ok, this fits, but man I'm seeing way too much of these" score.
Thinking back on it now, I should have bumped yours up to a 7. My bad. |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 08:20:34 AM · #821 |
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by skewsme:
hey team sucker - 5.7 is not a shabby score! |
It's clean, sharp, strikingly well lit, and original in concept, and it barely finished above the middle of the pack... I'm not complaining (not much anyway), I'm just saying... That's pretty much an absolutely straight-from-camera image, btw...
R. |
Well, it got a 6 from me, but I thought it would have benefited greatly by a square crop. The length of the portrait crop diverted my attention from the geometry of the post-it notes, and turned it into more of a photograph of the vertical blinds.
As for the 'origami', man, I couldn't agree more. Most of the origami shots got a static 6 from me. My standard "yah, ok, this fits, but man I'm seeing way too much of these" score.
Thinking back on it now, I should have bumped yours up to a 7. My bad. |
I tried the square crop actually, but it wasn't working for me. What I liked was the playing off of the fairly ethereal verticality of the composition against the square reality of the notes.
Or something like that :-)
R. |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 03:33:56 PM · #822 |
PostLUMINOUS Awards for Post It:
The Nominees:
 witt34
 sempermarine
and each get the PostLuminous Nomination
The PostLumie goes to:
a deceptively "simple" image--proof that Less is often Elegantly More....
 Bear_Music
The winner |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 03:40:10 PM · #823 |
Thanks for the recognition. Very much appreciated!
|
|
|
|
02/23/2009 04:01:04 PM · #824 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by K10DGuy:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by skewsme:
hey team sucker - 5.7 is not a shabby score! |
It's clean, sharp, strikingly well lit, and original in concept, and it barely finished above the middle of the pack... I'm not complaining (not much anyway), I'm just saying... That's pretty much an absolutely straight-from-camera image, btw...
R. |
Well, it got a 6 from me, but I thought it would have benefited greatly by a square crop. The length of the portrait crop diverted my attention from the geometry of the post-it notes, and turned it into more of a photograph of the vertical blinds.
As for the 'origami', man, I couldn't agree more. Most of the origami shots got a static 6 from me. My standard "yah, ok, this fits, but man I'm seeing way too much of these" score.
Thinking back on it now, I should have bumped yours up to a 7. My bad. |
I tried the square crop actually, but it wasn't working for me. What I liked was the playing off of the fairly ethereal verticality of the composition against the square reality of the notes.
Or something like that :-)
R. |
Well that just goes to show eh? lol. |
|
|
|
02/23/2009 04:13:51 PM · #825 |
That's cool, thanks! (I feel better now, I think)
R.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 04:20:39 PM EDT.
