Author | Thread |
|
03/18/2008 02:04:02 PM · #1 |
Hey found this and it helped me thought I'd share!
F stop stop motion chart
1/10000 will stop streaming water into individual drops
1/8000 will stop most any motion
1/4000 high enough speed to take pictures while walking/ and freeze baseballs ie. 90mph
1/2000 will stop most motion
1/1000 will stop bicyclists and runners
1/500 will freeze a person jumping in the air ie. basketball
1/250 will stop some motion
1/125 to avoid camera shake
Speeds that blur motion. Use a tripod for these speeds.
1/60 slight blurring of motion if not supporting camera steady
1/30 very good speed to show a bit of blur when photographing dancers
1/15 the blurring of motion becomes clearly evident
1/8 the blurring motion becomes more pronounced
1/4 the blurring of motion becomes extreme
1/2 high speed motion begins to become invisible
1 medium speed motion begins to become invisible
2 all motion begins to become invisible
4 more motion begins to become invisible
8 motion develops a fog like quality
B this one allows you to keep the shutter open as long as you want figure it out
Hope this helps some of you!
|
|
|
03/18/2008 02:44:47 PM · #2 |
The line that says, "Use a tripod for these speeds" can be moved down a few lines if you are using IS lenses. :-)
|
|
|
03/18/2008 02:47:25 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by Patrick_R:
1/125 to avoid camera shake |
I'd dispute this line, as it is completely dependent on many factors such as your ability to hold the camera still and the focal length of the lens. |
|
|
03/18/2008 02:47:46 PM · #4 |
indeed you know I have never tried one? im such a noob lol
|
|
|
03/18/2008 02:48:46 PM · #5 |
This is based of 85 mm I think. I didn't right it but its close enough
|
|
|
03/18/2008 02:59:05 PM · #6 |
The rule of thumb I use is that the approximate shutter speed you need when shotting hand held is:
1/[focal length]
i.e. if you're shooting at 85mm you need approximately 1/85 secs or faster to avoid camera shake. Anything slower and you might need a tripod.
however, as bfox2 said, it largely depends on your ability to hold the camera still. Thinking about it, would camera-to-subject distance be an issue too?
Message edited by author 2008-03-18 14:59:27. |
|
|
03/18/2008 03:10:35 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by SoulMan1978: .....
however, as bfox2 said, it largely depends on your ability to hold the camera still. .... |
With a healthy beer-gut, you can eliminate camera-shake up to one full f-stop.
|
|
|
03/18/2008 03:15:31 PM · #8 |
Lol i didn't exactly mean this to be a debate really I just wanted to show about the stop motion aspect of it. ie what it takes to freeze certain motions or when that stop might be used. Forget when to use a tripod that has to do more with the user. I have really steady hands and can hold longer exposers just fine however I have a friend with a twitch that could hold a 125 to save his life. Oh and he wanted to be a tattoo/piercing artist at one point.
Oh and strikeslip thanks for the laugh! :)
|
|
|
03/18/2008 03:22:47 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Patrick_R: .... I have really steady hands and can hold longer exposers just fine ...... |
You're looking pretty skinny in your profile pic. Just imagine the longer hand-held exposures you could take if you signed up for Slippy's School of Sudz.
Message edited by author 2008-03-18 15:23:11.
|
|
|
03/18/2008 03:43:29 PM · #10 |
Im only 20 that would be naughty! :)
|
|
|
03/18/2008 03:46:20 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by SoulMan1978: Thinking about it, would camera-to-subject distance be an issue too? |
Yup, focal length and subject distance change most of these shutter speeds, not just when camera shake is an issue. Not a bad starting point though.
Message edited by author 2008-03-18 15:46:51. |
|
|
03/18/2008 03:53:56 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by Patrick_R: Im only 20 that would be naughty! :) |
Obviously, you're just not that serious about photography, then. ;-)
|
|
|
03/18/2008 03:54:58 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: Originally posted by Patrick_R: .... I have really steady hands and can hold longer exposers just fine ...... |
You're looking pretty skinny in your profile pic. Just imagine the longer hand-held exposures you could take if you signed up for Slippy's School of Sudz. |
Rumor has it that Slippy's going to be buying a round or two after the Harsh Environments challenge. |
|
|
03/18/2008 04:09:32 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by mad_brewer: Originally posted by Strikeslip: Originally posted by Patrick_R: .... I have really steady hands and can hold longer exposers just fine ...... |
You're looking pretty skinny in your profile pic. Just imagine the longer hand-held exposures you could take if you signed up for Slippy's School of Sudz. |
Rumor has it that Slippy's going to be buying a round or two after the Harsh Environments challenge. |
You'll just have to come to Burlington to collect. :-P
|
|
|
03/18/2008 05:09:58 PM · #15 |
lol after I saw bread as a challenge.... i thought I was going to need a drink.... not to mention blurry mess! Which oddly enough was really fun for me to shoot. ah I turn 21 in april maybe I'll give your method a shot!
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/28/2025 01:11:18 PM EDT.