| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/24/2007 07:31:10 PM · #51 |
Originally posted by Rino63:
eheheheheh.......are you sure that are only 2??? |
shhhhh.
I'm not telling anyone about my De Sousa account.
shhhhh.
Message edited by author 2007-07-24 19:32:07.
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:31:26 PM · #52 |
Originally posted by Brad:
I hope nobody ever catches on to my 2 other accounts. One is under the name of scalvert, the other is librodo.
Maybe the SC should ban both of them to be safe. |
LOL
i thought judi and idnic were also you in drag?
Kev |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:33:42 PM · #53 |
Nah - they just naturally look like guys.
(Time to hide now)
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:34:06 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by jhonan:
Originally posted by rswank:
And "Complete bannishment (including profile) is all we have to battle such a complete violation" is a little melodramatic. |
There's quite a bit of melodrama in this thread.
IMO admin announcements like this should just be posted and locked. I can't see what there is to debate or discuss. |
We debated this issue internally on whether to post an announcement and whether to advise who was banned and whether to allow discussion. We opted for as much openness as possible to allow for transparency of our actions (if not our investigative methods, which we keep to ourselves for obvious reasons), to allow people to discuss something in an appropriate thread and not litter the forums, and finally to effect general deterrence. |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:35:51 PM · #55 |
Originally posted by Brad:
Originally posted by Rino63:
eheheheheh.......are you sure that are only 2??? |
shhhhh.
I'm not telling anyone about my De Sousa account.
shhhhh. |
You forgot the Alexsaberi and Larus accounts! :P
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:36:43 PM · #56 |
Originally posted by frisca:
Originally posted by jhonan:
Originally posted by rswank:
And "Complete bannishment (including profile) is all we have to battle such a complete violation" is a little melodramatic. |
There's quite a bit of melodrama in this thread.
IMO admin announcements like this should just be posted and locked. I can't see what there is to debate or discuss. |
We debated this issue internally on whether to post an announcement and whether to advise who was banned and whether to allow discussion. We opted for as much openness as possible to allow for transparency of our actions (if not our investigative methods, which we keep to ourselves for obvious reasons), to allow people to discuss something in an appropriate thread and not litter the forums, and finally to effect general deterrence. |
Yeah well if you ask me you posted after a running joke that needs to stop its not even funny to joke about cheating. |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:38:03 PM · #57 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Just a a few thoughts:
Alley Cat is quite young. A permanent ban for a child? Especially with a bigger sister that could have pressured her? Give that one a bit of thought, ok?
And as far as Amy goes... well, I'm torn on that, she is old enough that she should have known better, but hey, I made some more serious stupid mistakes when I was her age. |
photoman with you all the way meet you in the bar |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:38:49 PM · #58 |
Originally posted by doctornick:
Originally posted by Brad:
Originally posted by Rino63:
eheheheheh.......are you sure that are only 2??? |
shhhhh.
I'm not telling anyone about my De Sousa account.
shhhhh. |
You forgot the Alexsaberi and Larus accounts! :P |
well!!!! other 50 accounts and I will have some possibilities in some challenge :P |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:38:55 PM · #59 |
Originally posted by Brad:
Nah - they just naturally look like guys.
(Time to hide now) |
where would you hide?
They will find you.
And then nobody will find the pieces.
Kev |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:39:15 PM · #60 |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:45:21 PM · #61 |
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft...
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:47:47 PM · #62 |
All kidding aside, what has happened is sad, and I do appreciate the often thankless task the Site Council does here.
I just like to toss in a bit of asinine with reality once in a while.
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:48:38 PM · #63 |
I just looked at the "Sea" challenge. Indeed the 20th place image has been removed, but there is now no 20th place. There's a 19th and a 21st, but no 20th. Shouldn't all images from 21st on down move up one? That's how it's usually done.
Just sayin'
*ETA* The other two challenges as well.
Message edited by author 2007-07-24 19:50:17.
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:49:16 PM · #64 |
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
...So if I take your car but don't claim it as mine, and don't tell people it is really yours ... then it's NOT theft?
Interesting concept.
Ray
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:50:54 PM · #65 |
| The perm ban was for ban evasion and impersonating a user. *Not* for image theft. |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:50:56 PM · #66 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
...So if I take your car but don't claim it as mine, and don't tell people it is really yours ... then it's NOT theft?
Interesting concept.
Ray |
And don't forget not asking him to use it! |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:52:03 PM · #67 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
...So if I take your car but don't claim it as mine, and don't tell people it is really yours ... then it's NOT theft?
|
If you own a car like it, I think it falls under fair use ;-)
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:53:33 PM · #68 |
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
she took photos from this site, altered them and posted them on her site. without permission from the original photographer. seems pretty negative to me.
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:54:19 PM · #69 |
Originally posted by RayEthier:
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
...So if I take your car but don't claim it as mine, and don't tell people it is really yours ... then it's NOT theft?
Interesting concept.
Ray |
Ray and I don't agree allot but we do here:) Who gave her the right to alter the photos in the first place. besides I could forgive that as I like to forgive most things but then to not even take her punishment (which when she returned nobody would have known what she did) she decided to act like she was her sister and continue to enter challenges.
Message edited by author 2007-07-24 19:55:31. |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:54:20 PM · #70 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by RayEthier:
...So if I take your car but don't claim it as mine, and don't tell people it is really yours ... then it's NOT theft?
|
If you own a car like it, I think it falls under fair use ;-) |
If my translating is correct I can use the first ferrari that I find on the way??? I like it :) |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 07:55:15 PM · #71 |
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
It's implied ownership. A lie by omission. And theft.
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 08:05:09 PM · #72 |
Originally posted by Rebecca:
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
It's implied ownership. A lie by omission. And theft. |
HEAR HEAR!
Very well put, you also forgot it offended the sweet corn lovers in the world.
 |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 08:05:43 PM · #73 |
Originally posted by sher:
Originally posted by noisemaker:
everyone you are getting negative too quick. Amy never actually stated on the website that the photos were hers, she just did not give credit, so it wasn't theft... |
she took photos from this site, altered them and posted them on her site. without permission from the original photographer. seems pretty negative to me. |
BURN THEM>>>BURN THEM ALL....
|
|
|
|
07/24/2007 08:07:08 PM · #74 |
| How do we know for sure that these two girls won't just make another account? |
|
|
|
07/24/2007 08:08:18 PM · #75 |
| It's not impossible that they would. But, eventually, they will get caught, I feel. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 06:39:43 PM EDT.
