| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 11/17/2002 05:52:56 PM · #1 | 
		| | Does anyone know the difference between normal filters (UV, polariser etc.) and "digital" filters? 
 I was heading over to 7dayshop.com to get some for our shiny new Dimage7 and noticed that they sell both types. The only difference I can see is that ones with "digital" in the name are about three times the price!! Surely, a filter is a filter?
 
 Mystified...
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/17/2002 06:19:17 PM · #2 | 
		| | Originally posted by ganders: Does anyone know the difference between normal filters (UV, polariser etc.) and "digital" filters?
 
 I was heading over to 7dayshop.com to get some for our shiny new Dimage7 and noticed that they sell both types. The only difference I can see is that ones with "digital" in the name are about three times the price!! Surely, a filter is a filter?
 
 Mystified...
 
 None of the filters i have bought are specified as 'digital' filters.. i didn't know there was a difference..
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/17/2002 06:31:43 PM · #3 | 
		| | Originally posted by jmsetzler: Originally posted by ganders:
 [i]Does anyone know the difference between normal filters (UV, polariser etc.) and "digital" filters?
 
 I was heading over to 7dayshop.com to get some for our shiny new Dimage7 and noticed that they sell both types. The only difference I can see is that ones with "digital" in the name are about three times the price!! Surely, a filter is a filter?
 
 Mystified...
 
 None of the filters i have bought are specified as 'digital' filters.. i didn't know there was a difference..
 [/i]
 
 There should be no difference. The filtering is taking place in front of the optics, and in front of a detector ( digital or film). Since in many cases the goal is to reproduce the output of film, you would like the filters to be the same. I would have guessed that the phrase "digital filter" would be software based. If there were a difference based on a detector response function, I would guess that Canon or Nikon would have made folks aware of it - and I don't believe they have.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/17/2002 07:03:34 PM · #4 | 
		| | the only thing that gets brought up is that many digital cameras use a contrast based through the lens focusing system, which can
 be disrupted by linear polarising filters.
 
 So you might need a circlar polarising filter, depending on your camera.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/18/2002 11:11:24 AM · #5 | 
		| | Thanks Gordon - I tend to go for circular polarisers for my SLR too, since I heard they are better for most AF lenses... 
 Sounds like a gimmick perhaps....
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/24/2002 11:47:20 PM · #6 | 
		| | Yeah, it's just an advertising gimmick...Digital filters vs. Traditional Filters .... As someone already pointed out Linear Polarizers can mess with the camera's AF system but that's about it. 
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/27/2025 04:39:16 AM EDT.