Author | Thread |
|
06/26/2006 04:48:35 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by CalamitysMaster00: Have you checked with any MINOR league teams in your area? Your exact scenario is happening to a local KC photographer and since I work front office for the local KC NAFL team, I stuck him on as our photographer. Most NAFL teams, believe it or not, are NOT paid and thus the extended staff is all volunteer. He did the job unpaid but since his name is on all our work and is advertised with the team at games and on the website... he has really gotten work from referrals.
The good thing with working with a sports team is that most teams are family and as long as you're helping out - the fans and family come to you for all their photography needs!
GOOD LUCK |
I'm already doing Minor League Baseball in my area. I have that approval through my credentials with MiLB.com.
|
|
|
06/28/2006 04:26:55 PM · #27 |
Also, as I have mentioned previously before in another thread... get a myspace. If you are at all interested in openning your market to a younger crowd or to even just an eclectic market - its free and worth it.
|
|
|
06/28/2006 05:33:11 PM · #28 |
Interesting info about LifeTouch as they are used here in the schools as well. They also seem to have some sort of contract with the recreation league (primarily the younger players) to do sports shots. However, the only type of "sports shot" I've ever seen come from them is the standard child with bat, ball/glove, etc. portrait. I have YET to see any type of "action shot." |
|
|
06/28/2006 10:50:30 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by amandak: Interesting info about LifeTouch as they are used here in the schools as well. They also seem to have some sort of contract with the recreation league (primarily the younger players) to do sports shots. However, the only type of "sports shot" I've ever seen come from them is the standard child with bat, ball/glove, etc. portrait. I have YET to see any type of "action shot." |
I'm fairly confident that its' the same here. I think the principal of the school has misunderstood what they told her. Now I have to find a way to prove that and make her aware of it. I'm at another dead end though. She told me she would have her secretary contact me with that info and I haven't heard anything. I'm being passed off so I sorta doubt I'll get much. I'm still pursuing the other three schools. If I get that access, I'll not worry so much about this one.
|
|
|
06/28/2006 11:59:43 PM · #30 |
The principal probably knows exactly how many shots the company takes and all the shots that could be taken but aren't. Most school districts need the money to fund the sports programs. The company is paying the school to keep the competition out, they are not really paying to be able to take pictures of the kids in action.
After awhile you understand what, "it takes money to make money" really means.
All you are looking for it the ability to hand out business cards? Why not just buy a big banner at the stadium, put your info on it and walk around taking all the photos you can? The kids will be able to figure out who to come to if they need action shots. |
|
|
06/30/2006 07:48:14 AM · #31 |
If you like action shots, check out this guys website. He must have some sort of deal with the dirtbike track my son runs on. He is allowed inside the fencing, on the track, during the races to take the pictures and his prices that he gets for these things are amazing. You could make some big $$ finding a local race track (either cars or bikes) and getting your name out there.
his site is mppics.com
Good luck! |
|
|
07/06/2006 01:26:25 AM · #32 |
This project has been a failure for me. I can't say that I didn't try though...
One of the four schools rejected my offer. Two others won't return or take my phone calls. One school was interested in my offer.
I can't do it for just one school, so I'm backing off on this project and will look for some other avenue later.
|
|
|
07/06/2006 01:30:10 AM · #33 |
I think schools dont usually offer much income, unless they seek you for yearbooks or stuff like that - but it's also non-frequent so it is best to have other sources under your belt besides doing schools. |
|
|
07/07/2006 05:10:38 PM · #34 |
Well, I am sorry to hear your going Freelance idea fell through. You do such great work. I expecially appeciate that you were willing to post your failures as well as successes. |
|
|
07/08/2006 01:21:41 AM · #35 |
since i don't live there, i don't know how similar our situations are. i do know that there are some advantages to living in a larger metropolitan area (like a state capitol), but those advantages are by no means a barrier to entry for those living in other areas.
where i live, there is one daily paper. my county has two weekly papers. it seems there are at least two weekly papers in each of the six counties that make up the core of central virginia. four of the papers are owned by media general, the rest are independently owned. even though there are probably another eight weeklies published in and around the city, most of them don't look like they pay for photography. and there are two or three locally published monthly magazines. the point is, around here, there is a lot of publishing going on, especially if you are willing/able to get around.
i shoot in 6 different counties, as well as the city. in the county i live in, there are only 4 high schools. within a hour's drive of me, there are close to 45 high schools, some producing state championship teams and college recruits on a regular basis (detroit tiger rookie phenom justin verlander grew about 30 minutes away from me.). the point is, there is a ton of quality activity within a short drive.
in catawba county, you have two daily papers, one owned by media general, the other not. barely 40 miles in any direction are 4 more daily papers, as well as a handful of community/weekly papers. in addition to the 4 high schools you've contacted, there are a bunch more high schools in the surrounding counties. besides the high schools, there are also a lot of colleges fairly close by. here again, there are endless opportunities where you are--maybe not in your front yard, but certainly in your backyard.
so, what do you do?
start with looking at your current situation. you're stringing for a daily that pays about $40 per assignment on what sounds like a "works for hire" contract. here are the things to consider:
-> how many assignments do you get a week?
-> are they keeping you as busy as you want to be?
-> is there any chance to get on staff?
-> how does your work compare with the staffers's work?
-> how does your work compare with the other stringers?
-> has your willingness to go the extra mile been recognized by management?
-> would anybody miss you if you stopped shooting?
-> are there any other stringers getting called ahead of you?
-> how available are you?
why do these things matter? in some ways, it sounds like you've been doing the work of a paid staffer without getting paid. on one hand, it's good experience to be behind a desk, managing your work (especially being able to do quality control), but, they have employees to do that. at some point, you have to decide just how much time you can afford to spend prepping images for the paper. the only guidelines i've ever been given were to size the images to 200dpi, make them 10-12" on their longest side, include complete fileinfo captioning, and save them as jpgs quality 10. typically, the only edits i make are crops and slight curve adjustments. at first, i was attempting to dpc-edit my images, but i quickly realized that it just wasn't worth it. the publications have people that know their printing processes, and there was not much more i could add that would really make a difference to how well something is going to show up in print. basically, i learned that all i can do is shoot 'em, that someone else would be responsible for what happens afterwards.
also, we know you do good work--but, we're not your market. by now, just based on quality of work, you should have built up a bit of name recognition for yourself. that alone should be enough to get going. if you've been shooting sports for any period of time, i would find it hard to believe you would have anyone checking your credentials at one of the local high schools. the people at the pass gate should know you by name. the people in the stands should be able to connect you with the imagery they see in the paper. well, at least that's what we would hope...and that's why the questions about your competition (both staff and stringer) are important. do people recognize you, or not? it's not enough to have a handful of happy parents of kids you've shot; you need to be recognized as THE guy who gets THE shots.
so, let's say you've built the name recognition. what can you do about your deal? if you've got a "works for hire" contract with a media general publication, you've got a few extra hoops to jump through. this is where the answers to some of those questions become critical. believe me, the photo director KNOWS the contract. the issue is simple--what are YOU worth to HIM? are you available at the drop of a hat to shoot anything without complaining about it? are you at the top of the list when there are no staffers to call? how does your work compare? while you can't make yourself indispensible, you can create value. the more valuable you are, the more like they will be to work with you in getting rid of the "works for hire" contract and replacing it with a "publishing agreement".
what's the difference between the two? well, with a "publishing agreement", you own your work and you retain your copyrights; you give them a one-time license to print an image (as well as publish it on the web). you get paid for any reruns of the image, and, (this is one of the best parts) if anyone wants a print, the publication has to refer them to you. there is no difference in what they pay for assignments. the only "works for hire" contracts i have are with the associated press and with richmond international raceway; i don't mind these, because the scope of the work is so narrow, there's not as much downstream for me as there is shooting something like a high school baseball game. one nice thing about my "publishing agreement" with media general is that it has been recognized by all the media general publications i've worked for.
worst case scenario: the paper won't budge. you have to find another publication that will print your stuff under a "publication agreement". why? just to have some legitimacy when you show up to shoot something. i know you've mentioned having a state high school credential, and i have no clue what's involved in getting one. it seems to me that's your ticket. i've check with the virginia high school league, and as far as i've been able to find out, they don't have anything like that up here. when it comes to sports, the athletic directors are the ones calling the shots, especially as to who gets on the sideline. if you have a credential, it shouldn't be an issue. the thing is, all you really need is access to the events you want to shoot, and then some outlet for making sure people know how to find you.
and that's the heart of the matter. when it comes to marketing, i prefer to stay under the radar. i'm not going to go through the parking lots, sticking flyers under every car windshield, and i'm not going to go through the crowd handing out stuff. i am going to have great relationships with the shool athletic directors and booster club presidents. i am going to hand my card to anyone who i talk to. you may have jumped the gun trying to go through the principals and the school administration (it's so much easier for them to shoot you down than to take a risk that you might do something that could cause a problem.) when all you really need is to be able to get on the sidelines just so you can add to your inventory.
in the end, it is all about relationships. that's why you need a champion/cheerleader at the paper who wants to see you be successful, rather than just to use you until you're tired of being used. that's why you need to be visible and shooting as much as you can around the schools on non-sports stories (i spent nearly 12 hours shooting 4 high school graduations--i was seen by nearly teacher and administrator in the county that day, as well as all the parents attending). if you make yourself THE community photographer, you'll be able to shoot just about anything you want whenever you want, and to have people pay you for your efforts.
hope this helps some, if not you, then someone else.
cheers, and good luck!
skip |
|
|
07/08/2006 01:44:28 AM · #36 |
Skip,
Thanks for the post. I don't know if I can answer everything you posted, but here are some briefs:
1. I am valuable to them and I'm the only stringer the paper uses. I don't have to fight with others for the work.
2. There is a possibility that I could become full time at some point. In fact, I was told that they had a third photographer in the budget for 2006, but nothing has come of that yet.
3. I'm not irreplaceable. No one is. I think they would have a difficult time replacing me with someone properly equipped who is willing to do the work for what I get paid to do it. Yes... $40 per assignment... averaging anywhere between $500 and $900 per month, sometimes a little more.
4. I like the idea of the 'publishing agreement'. Do you have a sample document that I could use? I'm planning on asking for an increase in the stringer fee. I was denied when I asked last year, but I have been doing it for two years now with no increase, no mileage reimbursement, and gas is a lot more expensive now than when I started.
|
|
|
07/08/2006 07:39:37 AM · #37 |
Originally posted by jmsetzler: Thanks for the post. I don't know if I can answer everything you posted |
;-) i meant it more as foundation for having a conversation with oneself. not knowing how similar our situations are, these are things that i've had to consider.
there are some key issues to your situation, though, and it sounds like your head's in the right place. as i expected, you have built a solid reputation with the paper, and you have made yourself their go-to guy for anything that can't be covered by staff--and you've set the bar for what anyone else would have to do. while there might be some things that are out of your control, it's not bad. it doesn't hurt to ask for a bump, but don't expect it. be prepared to give every logical argument to justify it, but also be prepared for it not to take. while i've seen some flexibility in media general's subsidiary publications, i've also gotten the impression that they all are 'encouraged' to follow the corporate standard.
up here, the daily has 11 staff photographers, sometimes 1-2 interns, sometimes 1-2 externs (unpaid interns), and 5-10 freelancers (and, more and more, they're pushing the reporters to get their own shots with point-and-shoots). they've only hired one staff photographer in the past 6 years, and they've only fired one in the recent history (for visual plagerism!). so, on one hand, it's a solid job with a fair amount of security. on the other hand, i was told that i probably would find it very limiting in terms of giving up the independence i now enjoy. i think i've found a balance, especially considering that i do have a fair amount of competition. i'd like to think i've set a bar, but, as you know, no one is irreplaceable.
one key for me has been to look for as many other opportunities as possible. yes, you might be stuck with what you have at the HDR, but, if you have value to them, they shouldn't hold it against you if you start to branch out.
Originally posted by Media General website: Media General owns more daily newspapers in the Southeast than any other company. The companyâs publishing assets include three metropolitan newspapers, The Tampa Tribune, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and the Winston-Salem Journal; 22 daily community newspapers in Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Alabama and South Carolina; and more than 100 weekly newspapers and other publications. |
who knows what other opportunities there are out there, just with them...check out what they have just near you media general papers
for example, MG owns Virginia Business Magazine. even though they use a lot of the RTD's staff, they also use freelancers to cover stuff--especially out of town stuff. i've started shooting for them, as well. you might want to check with some state-wide mags and let them know you are available for assignments out in your neck of the woods.
Originally posted by jmsetzler: I like the idea of the 'publishing agreement'. Do you have a sample document that I could use? |
it might be a day or so, but i'll shoot you a copy of mine.
personally, i think there is an unending amount of opportunity out there for anyone willing to work and make some sacrifices. yeah, it's a pain having to shell out for gear and gas, and it's not always easy on the family when you have to take an assignment, but the rewards are over-the-top--especially when you get to the point that you realize you can make a living at it.
Message edited by author 2006-07-08 07:44:56. |
|
|
07/10/2006 10:12:27 PM · #38 |
just a quick follow up...
i did have a chance to talk with a couple of my editors over the weekend, discussing my situation and how they felt about the differences between the two types of contracts. the basic feedback was that they didn't have a problem with publishing agreements (even though it means a bit more overhead on their part, having to keep track of who they owe for what when something is reprinted). however, they didn't look at putting one in place as an automatic. they both prefer to use the works for hire contract as a "probationary" contract, until someone proves their value. they both agreed that the works for hire was a really bad deal for a full-time freelancer, but that it was perfectly suitable for someone who is only available on a limited basis (like evenings and weekends). i have another friend in the exact same situation, where he probably won't be able to change the situation unless he can commit to more availability. |
|
|
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 10:39:06 AM |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 10:39:06 AM EDT.
|