| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/22/2006 11:45:09 AM · #26 |
| Whoa! Views since voting: 77306 for that image!!!!! |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 11:58:03 AM · #27 |
| Well, if any image deserves linking, that one by Jemison is a great choice! |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 11:58:06 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by langdon:
This got linked on FARK, and apparently we were set up to handle such a load: |
Really FARKed thing up around here....
|
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:20:19 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by langdon:
This got linked on FARK, and apparently we were set up to handle such a load:
We're tweaking things now to find an optimal setting. |
OUCH!!! Sorry about that. I was informed this morning by someone who just joined DPC yesterday that he had linked my image on Fark. That site seems to be a bit "roudy", but it has generated a few sales of the image. I am getting views at the rate of approx. 8,000 per hour since I noticed this!
Sorry folks. |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:23:59 PM · #30 |
| It's kind of a double edged sword. You brough DPC down, but then again...you were FARKED! It's not everyday you get Farked. And you sold some prints. Well done. Just don't let it happen again. |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:31:36 PM · #31 |
Pretty slowed down even now, here...
R.
|
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:34:57 PM · #32 |
someone wake me when the screen changes!
|
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:36:33 PM · #33 |
Holy crap! The number of views on that shot is amazing! LOL WOW... Maybe it'll get people looking at some of our images too! ;-)
Message edited by author 2006-03-22 12:37:46. |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:38:38 PM · #34 |
Looks like it's about to become the 2nd highest 'most viewed' - currently at 84,124
Although it's got a long way to go to beat 'splash of color' at 204,762 |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:45:32 PM · #35 |
| Boy, that Fark.com is some site. I just found this interesting news article on the dangers of home-made alcohol. |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:55:55 PM · #36 |
86,173 now... Good grief.
R.
|
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:57:45 PM · #37 |
Hey farkers, try some of the cheese while your here ... LOL.
Sure could use some print sales. :-)
|
|
|
|
03/22/2006 12:58:45 PM · #38 |
And now 86,507 is how many minues? Holy Moly...
That comes out to 100 views a minute, give or take...
R.
Message edited by author 2006-03-22 12:59:35.
|
|
|
|
03/22/2006 01:44:12 PM · #39 |
| Wondering just what is going on with the stats for my image. A few minutes ago it showed slightly over 90,000 views. Now it shows 88,719, and has been frozen there for some time now. Have the site administrators taken some action? |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 02:18:34 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by jemison:
Wondering just what is going on with the stats for my image. A few minutes ago it showed slightly over 90,000 views. Now it shows 88,719, and has been frozen there for some time now. Have the site administrators taken some action? |
My guess is that, to reduce server load, they made a "static" version of your image's page. I.e., rather than having to "re-create" the page, stats, comments, etc each time the page is requested (as is done normally), the server is simply returning a "cached" copy of the page each time. (Hence, the view count displayed remains the same.) I would think this would greatly reduce the load on the server's database.
However, it seems that they are still tracking the stats for your image. If you go to the Most Viewed page, the view count for your image is still (rapidly) increasing.
Message edited by author 2006-03-22 14:20:01. |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 02:24:24 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by ericpi:
Originally posted by jemison:
Wondering just what is going on with the stats for my image. A few minutes ago it showed slightly over 90,000 views. Now it shows 88,719, and has been frozen there for some time now. Have the site administrators taken some action? |
My guess is that, to reduce server load, they made a "static" version of your image's page. I.e., rather than having to "re-create" the page, stats, comments, etc each time the page is requested (as is done normally), the server is simply returning a "cached" copy of the page each time. (Hence, the view count displayed remains the same.) I would think this would greatly reduce the load on the server's database.
However, it seems that they are still tracking the stats for your image. If you go to the Most Viewed page, the view count for your image is still (rapidly) increasing. |
Ahhh yes. That seems to be a sensible thing to do, and makes me feel better about the inconvenience to others here. Glad to see that the stats are still going, as well! |
|
|
|
03/22/2006 04:01:33 PM · #42 |
this is going crazy today, slow, fast, slow and fast again,
site was to slow earlier and I had to do work today
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/26/2025 04:26:25 PM EDT.
