| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/19/2002 02:15:20 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
the horizontal line to me seems ''faster'' than the not very pronounced tilt it was on before, and allows the lines of the bike to be parallel to the frame, giving it a more harmonious visual sensation, and allowing me to really enjoy the visual lines and movement in the frame.
Don''t you still think it needs a hot biker momma though? ;-)
* This message has been edited by the author on 7/19/2002 2:15:12 PM. |
|
|
|
07/19/2002 02:19:23 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by jmsetzler:
I do need more open space on the right side of the frame tho... i would like to have a little more on the left too... behind the bike, but o well... i''ll see if i can''t pull this off again with a better shot later...
Just my opinion:
These are just things that could be better, rather than being ''wrong''
as such:
Too green, the background, t-shirt, foreground
Bike could be a bit ''crisper'' as it is slightly blurred - but still
a damn good job panning...
Light isn''t at the best angle to show off the chrome/ bike,
would be better from one side or another
Somehow it just doesn''t ''grab'' me - maybe the muted colours
cause that
The downhill feel to it maybe contributes as well
His expression/ body language don''t seem to jive well with the
feeling of speed - is he going fast ? does he look like he is/
is enjoying it ?
Blown highlights on the headlamp
* This message has been edited by the author on 7/19/2002 2:20:19 PM. |
|
|
|
07/19/2002 02:20:45 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by Kimbly:
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
[i]the horizontal line to me seems ''faster'' than the not very pronounced tilt it was on before, and allows the lines of the bike to be parallel to the frame, giving it a more harmonious visual sensation, and allowing me to really enjoy the visual lines and movement in the frame.
Don''t you still think it needs a hot biker momma though? ;-)
[/i]
that would be a definite plus :)
|
|
|
|
07/19/2002 02:22:20 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
using a polarizer wouldnt make the image 'darker' because your exposure would change to compensate.
all you would do would be to remove light reflecting on a particular angle, thereby reducing the glare.
polarizers are amazing.
Would also make it a whole lot harder to get a crisp pan shot, as the
exposure would be longer. a polariser might be a amazing but it would
make this harder.
also not sure of the impact on panning on the polarisers effect - certainly
it screws up 'stiched' panoramas, as the amount of impact varies with
the angle to the light source |
|
|
|
07/19/2002 02:23:30 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by GordonMcGregor:
Originally posted by jmsetzler:
[i]I do need more open space on the right side of the frame tho... i would like to have a little more on the left too... behind the bike, but o well... i''ll see if i can''t pull this off again with a better shot later...
Just my opinion:
These are just things that could be better, rather than being ''wrong''
as such:
Too green, the background, t-shirt, foreground
Bike could be a bit ''crisper'' as it is slightly blurred - but still
a damn good job panning...
Light isn''t at the best angle to show off the chrome/ bike,
would be better from one side or another
Somehow it just doesn''t ''grab'' me - maybe the muted colours
cause that
The downhill feel to it maybe contributes as well
His expression/ body language don''t seem to jive well with the
feeling of speed - is he going fast ? does he look like he is/
is enjoying it ?
Blown highlights on the headlamp
[/i]
Gordon, thanks for the comments.. you are right on all of these for sure... This particular shot was more of a test and learning experience than anything else. When I redo it, i will account for the colors and the background and everything else that is needed to make this a good photo :) |
|
|
|
07/19/2002 03:22:11 PM · #31 |
i would have said yes, but since there was no response to the original suggestion, i just figured this wasn't 'that kind of board'
; )
Originally posted by Kimbly:
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
[i]the horizontal line to me seems ''faster'' than the not very pronounced tilt it was on before, and allows the lines of the bike to be parallel to the frame, giving it a more harmonious visual sensation, and allowing me to really enjoy the visual lines and movement in the frame.
Don''t you still think it needs a hot biker momma though? ;-)
[/i]
|
|
|
|
07/19/2002 03:23:32 PM · #32 |
wouldnt you prefer a longer exposure for panning? too short an exposure and it''s over before you''ve barely panned..
anyway if the shutter speed were a big factor, you could hopefully just open your aperature and keep a fast shutter... :)
Originally posted by GordonMcGregor:
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
[i]
Would also make it a whole lot harder to get a crisp pan shot, as the
exposure would be longer.
* This message has been edited by the author on 7/19/2002 3:37:14 PM. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/26/2025 08:46:26 AM EDT.
