Image |
Comment |
| 01/08/2025 12:39:30 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2025 07:13:33 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2025 07:12:55 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2025 07:10:46 AM |
peekabooby rozComment: Even with such a challenge, you manage to fit it in. Very good, although the sharpness seems to be just a tiny bit in front of the eye. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2025 09:08:04 AM |
Snoozing for Santaby colorcarnivalComment: I would crop out the wire at the top of the image. (The B in B&W stands for black, not brown, by the way ;-) I does not affect my scoring) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2025 03:29:58 AM |
Street concertby LevTComment: Nice how you have combined the artist and the audience in one image. Works well. I do wonder how much of the image of the artist is remaining and whether it classifies or double exposure or just a clever edit.
For me, a double exposure means that two images are layered on top of each other and details of both images are visible in each part of the resulting image, unless one of the images uses a pure black. Ideally the resulting image is more than just the addition of the two. The combination shows some added value. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2025 03:29:19 AM |
Countryman by posthumousComment: One of the few, if not the only one, where the double exposure has a purpose, it tells a story. Great. Also a good balance of dark and light area's. My top pick in this challenge. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2025 03:24:30 AM |
The Old Beanby markwileyComment: Clever combination. Perfect fit ;-)
Although in the stricktest sense more than just a double exposure (like a number of others in this challenge). For me, a double exposure means that two images are layered on top of each other and details of both images are visible in each part of the resulting image, unless one of the images uses a pure black. Ideally the resulting image is more than just the addition of the two. The combination shows some added value. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2025 03:22:59 AM |
in the grassby rozComment: I don't recognise the double exposure aspect in this image. Maybe a focus stack? My interpretation of the challenge is that one should be able to see that it is a combination of two images and I am scoring it high if the combination is more than the simple addition of the two. (I know that is just my interpretation)
For me, a double exposure means that two images are layered on top of each other and details of both images are visible in each part of the resulting image, unless one of the images uses a pure black. Ideally the resulting image is more than just the addition of the two. The combination shows some added value. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2025 03:22:09 AM |
Never Enough!by GolferDDSComment: It is a clever combination of two images but is it a double exposure as intended in this challenge? I know, this is a personal interpretation. I wonder how much of the peanut image was removed and is that standard editing? I am voting as-if legal.
For me, a double exposure means that two images are layered on top of each other and details of both images are visible in each part of the resulting image, unless one of the images uses a pure black in certain parts. Ideally the resulting image is more than just the addition of the two. The combination shows some added value. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/02/2025 07:50:21 PM EDT.