Lightning at Night
by MargaretNet

Comment by digifotojo:
Extraordinary capture! 10

Moon Rise
by MargaretNet

Comment by DCrest01:
Enter your comment here, and then cast yourhttps://www.dpchallenge.com/challenge_vote_image.php?IMAGE_ID=1238553# vote...

Lightning at Night
by MargaretNet

Comment by Neat:
Looks like the winner to me, now I wonder where this is, big grin :)

Where water and sky become one
by MargaretNet

Comment by kiwinick:
nice lindscape the mist adds a bit of mystery to it 6

I am actually scared of thunderstorms
by MargaretNet

Comment by roz:
how great that you have overcome your fear to shoot such a stunning shot ..
the lightening is wonderful of course .. but i love all those lights as stars .. they seem to be almost calling out to the lightening .. pick me .. pick me .. !! .. ;)

Lightning at Night
by MargaretNet

Comment by roz:
catching lightening is something that dpcers absolutely love ..
so dramatic .. loving the lights like stars in the city below ..
this looks like it could ribbon .. good luck .. great shot .
not voting yet ..

Fallen
by MargaretNet

Comment by Janja:

Originally posted by ThingFish: Originally posted by marnet: Originally posted by ThingFish: Just a question...I didn't give you the 1 by the way...I gave you a 3. The reason being that I don't see any mention under standard editing of being allowed to use any feature of image processing software to manipulate/enhance the images in your submission. That is allowed under Extended editing though. If I misinterpreted the rules please enlighten me. I have submitted a similar image to the SC with this question. After some deliberations they allowed it. The rules are much more relaxed now and I personally am very much in favour. PS I am surprised that your vote was about the rules and not the image :( Well then I really don't understand why the rules are there in the first place if they are not implemented. Might as well do away with the rules completely then imo. My vote was not only based on the rules only thing....if it had been Extended Editing I would have voted a 7. In other words I deducted 4 points for the breaking of the rule. I wanted to deduct half of 7 but as you cannot vote half points I had. to decide on deducting a 3 or a 4.

In my opinion the only rule that was broken here is one of the voting rules:

You should:

recommend an entry be reviewed for disqualification if you feel it violates any rule. To do this, use the "here if you suspect a rules violation". link on the image's voting page, and give your reason in the space provided. After submitting your requests, vote assuming the entry did not violate any rules.

Edit: sorry I just noted this is already being discussed in a thread...

Message edited by author 2019-07-12 15:25:49.

Fallen
by MargaretNet

Comment by ThingFish:

Originally posted by marnet: Originally posted by ThingFish: Just a question...I didn't give you the 1 by the way...I gave you a 3. The reason being that I don't see any mention under standard editing of being allowed to use any feature of image processing software to manipulate/enhance the images in your submission. That is allowed under Extended editing though. If I misinterpreted the rules please enlighten me. I have submitted a similar image to the SC with this question. After some deliberations they allowed it. The rules are much more relaxed now and I personally am very much in favour. PS I am surprised that your vote was about the rules and not the image :(

Well then I really don't understand why the rules are there in the first place if they are not implemented. Might as well do away with the rules completely then imo.
My vote was not only based on the rules only thing....if it had been Extended Editing I would have voted a 7. In other words I deducted 4 points for the breaking of the rule. I wanted to deduct half of 7 but as you cannot vote half points I had. to decide on deducting a 3 or a 4.

Fallen
by MargaretNet

Comment by MargaretNet:

Originally posted by ThingFish: Just a question...I didn't give you the 1 by the way...I gave you a 3. The reason being that I don't see any mention under standard editing of being allowed to use any feature of image processing software to manipulate/enhance the images in your submission. That is allowed under Extended editing though. If I misinterpreted the rules please enlighten me.

I have submitted a similar image to the SC with this question. After some deliberations they allowed it. The rules are much more relaxed now and I personally am very much in favour.

PS I am surprised that your vote was about the rules and not the image :(

Fallen
by MargaretNet

Comment by ThingFish:
Just a question...I didn't give you the 1 by the way...I gave you a 3. The reason being that I don't see any mention under standard editing of being allowed to use any feature of image processing software to manipulate/enhance the images in your submission. That is allowed under Extended editing though. If I misinterpreted the rules please enlighten me.