Image |
Comment |
| 04/05/2010 04:13:57 AM |
untitledby eyeduphotosComment: Why untitled? Couldn't think of a title or are you wanting the viewer to understand the photo for themselves without the title getting in the way? |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/14/2010 05:10:23 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/20/2010 05:15:07 AM |
|
| 10/14/2009 12:47:05 PM |
Brushing Upby ZoomdakComment: I don't believe this actually should have been disqualified. It was done in camera. Or is multi-exposure in-camera now off limits too? |
| 10/10/2009 04:41:06 PM |
Storm over Florence by LevTComment: Originally posted by LevT: Originally posted by Zoomdak: Awesome shot! Congrats on the yellow.
Originally posted by LevT: Basically, half the time was wasted, and I missed a few good bolts because of that. Then I realized that if the previous shot came in empty (no lightning), I can avoid wasting valuable time by turning the camera off and then immediately back on - this interrupts the noise reduction routine. Maybe this tip can help someone in similar circumstances... |
...Or you could get a 5d Mark II where you can shoot the next picture while the previous image is still processing. =) |
I don't have a Canon, but I cannot imagine how this might work - because the NR in Nikons is spent not on image processing, but on recording an image with exactly the same settings as the original shot (same ISO and exposure), but with a closed shutter and then subtracting it from the original image. So while the camera is acquiring a 15-sec noise-only image it cannot take another shot. |
That makes sense, yeah. I'm not sure how it works either, but I know that I've been able to shoot another image while the previous one is noise processing (but also, then it takes that extra time processing after both images, or however many images are shot). |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 10/10/2009 03:59:43 PM |
Storm over Florence by LevTComment: Awesome shot! Congrats on the yellow.
Originally posted by LevT: Basically, half the time was wasted, and I missed a few good bolts because of that. Then I realized that if the previous shot came in empty (no lightning), I can avoid wasting valuable time by turning the camera off and then immediately back on - this interrupts the noise reduction routine. Maybe this tip can help someone in similar circumstances... |
...Or you could get a 5d Mark II where you can shoot the next picture while the previous image is still processing. =) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/26/2009 02:18:47 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/26/2009 02:18:10 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/26/2009 02:17:53 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/26/2009 02:17:38 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/11/2025 07:31:07 AM EDT.