Image |
Comment |
| 02/09/2006 06:55:20 PM |
Accelerationby MQuinnComment: Good use of depth of field, but doesn't do a good job of demonstrating motion blur, I'm afraid. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/09/2006 06:53:15 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/09/2006 06:47:58 PM |
|
| 02/09/2006 06:47:37 PM |
ppptheewyby M.O.C.Comment: Good depth of field, but doesn't really look like motion blur. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/09/2006 06:45:08 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/07/2006 09:14:19 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/06/2006 09:23:06 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/06/2006 06:09:59 PM |
Shell Negativeby theonemuleComment: Why? Sorry to sound like a smart-ass, but what does the negative effect really add here? |
| 02/02/2006 10:09:18 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/25/2006 10:43:04 AM |
Claudia Gestroby crgdavisComment: I'll freely admit that hot babes are likely to get a good score from me :) My only nitpicks on this one would be the marks on her leg that could have been cloned out, and the cropping seems a little off to me. I would have kept her foot entirely in the frame, and maybe would have eliminated just a bit of the headroom. You'll still get a good score, of course :) |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 09:49:12 AM EDT.