|
|
|
Showing 11971 - 11980 of ~12478 |
| Image |
Comment |
| 01/04/2005 01:26:58 AM | Father and sonby gaurawaComment: Exceptionally beautiful image. The more I look at it, the more details I see that interest me. Love the squinting right eye of the father, the detail of the wrappers, the fine hair detail on the foreheads, the perfect arc of hood around ear, etc etc.
The image is sl;ightly flawed by overuse of the USM, whch has produced a halo around the figures where the pixels contrast with the background. This can be avoided by using a selection mask to select out the figures alone, then shrinking the mask by 2 pixels all around, which woukld leave no extreme contrast at the edges of the mask and generate no halo. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/04/2005 01:17:55 AM | On the moveby nolockComment: Remarkable, out-of-the-box take on the challenge. There's a slightly distracting sliver of background showing upper left that should be cropped out. Possibly crop down also so the intersection of windowframe and extended arm of rider is at the top, not much of a crop. The critical sharpness in the reflection juxtaposed with the blurry reaility outside the window makes this picture. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/04/2005 01:14:29 AM | Wrenchin'by cbellerComment: There's a lot to like in this image, but a number of things are detracting as well.
Good points: sharpness of, and expression on, face. It's a nice study of concentration. Also the tonalities are rich, it's a good B/W conversion, mellow and smooth.
The croppung seems off to me; the truncated head is arbitrary, the space below the elbow is not doing anything. I tried cropping most of that lower space off and bringing the right edge in so I couldn't see any of the "77" in the background, and this was a tighhter & stronger crop to my eyes. Often, with candids, the crop will make or break the image.
It's unfortunate that the mechanic's hand and the rag are not also sharp. The hand, especially, could be a vital part of the image, but it's not. It looks like if you'd pul;led focus forward a bit, your DOF would have been ample to have had hand and face both sharp.
Finally, and this is critical, the wall behind the head is too bright, and it is pulling my eye in the wrong direction; I want to be following the direction of his gaze, but the eyetrap in upper left is oulling me the other way.
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2005 03:49:58 AM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2005 01:15:31 AM | Flowerpot!by photomComment: I can't believe this didn't place top 10... It was one of my 3 personal favorites.... I'm learning that deadpan, matter-of-fact approaches don't work very well in DPC, I think. |
| 01/02/2005 05:08:15 AM | Water Challenge - "Under" Water Colorsby DrakeComment: Visually this image just isn't working. It appears disorganized, chaotic. There are some areas of nice, luminous color, But everything right of center and above the horizontal frond is just visual "lost space" with nothing good happening. It's not like you have negative space in a dance with positive space, it's like the image just peters out on its own.
Referring to the stunning original on which this is "based", all they have in common is that you have punned on his title, and I'm sure that worked against you.
I wish I had something more positive to say, but this just isn't working at any level for me.
Robt.
|
| 01/02/2005 05:00:19 AM | Vaseby GinaRothfelsComment: *** CRITIQUE CLUB RESPONSE ***
This was based ont he orange/blue, mirrored vases in "opposites", and it's about as creative an interpretation of that image as I can imagine. For one thing, no color. For another, no vertical mirroring. Thirdly, no left/right "swapping" of colors (or anything else).
Now I quite like this image, and I ranked it high in the challenge. I'm surprised it didn't pull a 6+. What was working against it?
As mentioned by me (and several other commenters during the challenge voting), The assymetrical framing of this is really hurting it. Granted, the original was an asymmetrical image in toto, with the subjects pushed to the right, but we could see all of those vases, it's just their location within the frame that was off-center.
I believe if this image had been perfectly symmetrical it would have picked up at LEAST another half point in the voting, maybe more. That's really the only comment I can make about it, beyond that it's a stunning almost-abstract image in its own right.
Robt.
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2005 03:08:54 AM | | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2005 02:54:55 AM | Scramble 'emby shamelComment: It's clean and sharp, but IMO it would be MUCH better if the faces weren't drawn in. Lighting on the beater is very nice. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2005 02:53:18 AM | Minutes from Pieby lettybComment: I really, really wish this had warmer, more luminous lighting. It could be so sweet if it weren't blocked up in the shadows. I especially want to see more of the crank. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
Showing 11971 - 11980 of ~12478 |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/06/2026 06:11:30 AM EDT.
|