Image |
Comment |
| 01/29/2007 05:28:28 PM |
Isoscelesby escapetoozComment: Interesting shot, nice perspective, excellent lighting. I would like to see a sharper focus on the eyes. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 05:07:58 PM |
Gentle Breezeby MAKComment: Strong image, beautiful model, great use of lighting. Her expression is a mix of sultry innocence. Great job! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 05:06:57 PM |
The Dipperby CutterComment: Compositionally not the most interesting nude, but it does have a certain voyeuristic feel to it which is a good thing. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 04:48:26 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 04:47:42 PM |
I am the tuneby MichaelCComment: Beautiful use of lighting and excellent concept. It feels cropped a little tight on the bottom. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 03:36:05 PM |
angel boyby sigrun_thComment: Typically with a high key infant shot, I prefer to see a softer focus. I'm afraid you've pushed this one a bit too far and what appears to be wings of some sort get lost in all the brightness. Poses like this also work better if the legs are under the baby. I do realize this is difficult to achieve, but with a little care and patience, you can eventually get it. Next time, try lighting the background from an angle behind the baby with a softer fill flash to light the baby. I've used an off camera slave flash on white foamboard behind the baby and a softer strobe to light the baby on this exact same shot in the past. You've got a good start, a little more experimentation and practice will get you a much better shot. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 02:54:50 PM |
Mabelby InDotsComment: The pose and concept are both interesting and the model is beautiful. However, I am NOT a fan of several things. The foreground and background have been obviously removed and the halos around the subject are a bit distracting. The reflections in the glass cylinder that obscure the breast add visual interest, but the same reflection becomes a distraction when it obscures the models face. Your model has beautiful skin... it almost looks unreal! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 02:27:15 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 02:26:42 PM |
"Bear" Nakedby robaComment: Very nice. I like the pose, subject matter, composition, etc. I would say just a touch heavy on the NeatImage and I'm not a fan of the wrinkled up background the model is sitting on. She's on the stairs... let's see them. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/29/2007 02:25:20 PM |
jsut press hearby Elvis_LComment: I hope I'm safe in assuming that this is one of your first submissions. I am basing the following critique on that assumption. The members here are big fans of photography and most have very large monitors to view their craft. An image this size is often criticized because it shows up as only slightly larger than a thumbnail and all detail is lost. Many members (myself included) encourage everyone to use the full 680 pixels they are alloted so that we can better see what it is you are shooting. As far as the image is concerned, it is out of focus and you can barely see your subject. That would be OK in a more abstract challenge, but since this one is "nude", the viewers expect to see a "nude" subject. Granted, the body does not have to be fully "exposed", but nudity should at the very least be implied. You should also check your spelling before submitting an image. There are times when spelling is not as important, but when it comes to titles of artwork, people are kind of picky. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 03:59:32 PM EDT.