Upside Right
by Phocal

Comment:

*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

An intriguing image that meets the challenge well.

Well there's no doubting your image certainly fulfils the challenge brief! That looks like some difficult manoeuvre, its difficult to tell their exact position in relation to each other from this angle but I assume the inverted ones are above those flying normally? Anyway, there is nothing you can do to separate them but you have captured it well. The exposure is good.

One of your commenters has remarked about the blue sky but you need space for them to fly into and you also need to see where they've come from. I suppose you could have subdued the intensity of the sky but we have just three colours here blue, yellow and white all of which are working well together so I don't think there's even a need for that. The only other thing you could have done would have been to photograph them on the diagonal which I think could have worked well but if you wanted to document them accurately as you have here then it is not an option.

Anyway, thanks for your contribution and apologies for the delayed critique, Sid

Fishing Boats
by juliandaniel

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

An interesting image that contributes to the open nature of this challenge.

I get to comment once more on your image! The fishing boats are interesting especially if they are not a familiar type to the viewer as indeed they are not to me. The composition itself lacks impact, everything is placed quite centrally without much thought to the rule of thirds or any other aid that would have given it more impact.

I am rarely enthused by selective desat and this is no exception, apart from the question why at all but why just one boat why not all three? I think this would have been far better to leave all three in mono and concentrate on getting the best out of the mono tones within the image. I like the background detail but the sky is so boring and so much of it you could have taken most of it out and replaced it with foreground water for a much more interesting result.

Thanks for your submission, apologies for the delayed critique, Sid

Down then up
by gmink

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

An interesting approach that fails to meet the challenge.

I like your thinking and creative attempt to come at the challenge in an original way but I don't think you have managed to pull it off. The subject does not suggest upside down at all, it is what it is, simply water falling and forced back up again, that is not upside down.

I see you have gone to your smallest aperture and lowest ISO to get the slowest shutter speed possible which has all worked quite well, you have plenty of motion blur in the main flow and motion detail of individual drops from their upwards trajectory.

I like your image but unfortunately the wrong image for the wrong challenge, Sid

Looked simple on autumn
by clickodak

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

A grab shot that does not meet the challenge.

This feels as it sounds like an impromptu shot that has not had sufficient thought or preparation beforehand, although I think I understand your emotion behind it it does not suggest simplicity at all. There is too much that is competing for attention which is quite the opposite of what I should be getting if this were truly simplistic.

A much more simplistic approach would have been to focus on just one or two elements as opposed to the bridge, water, reflections, trees, leaves and sky that we have here, there is just far too much.

I'm sorry Marcel but this was definitely not one of your better ones, Sid

Deserted
by gmink

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

An interesting image that meets the challenge.

I think you've nailed the composition well here. The shapes and the shadows work well to form an interesting abstract of a common feature. I like the length and shape of the shadow and I like the diagonal that is formed by it. The shape of the structure is revealed by the foreground shadow and the way the light varies across the floor.

For the purpose of the challenge, although its only a minor point. I would definitely have removed the dead leaves preferably before shooting or, if necessary, through cloning, their removal would give the image more impact it truly would be more simplistic.

Thank you for your submission, apologies for the delay in critique, Sid

~Y E L L O W~
by KMcC

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

A very appealing image that meets the challenge well.

The beautiful bold colours here are very appealing and striking against the OOF sky background which is all very simplified in keeping with the challenge brief. However, I am somewhat confused by what I am seeing here, the OOF flower in the foreground is throwing the composition as a whole off balance it would have been better to exclude it or use a smaller aperture to get it into focus. It throws me because it is in front of the right hand flower which is all clearly in focus yet none of this is. It doesn't appear to be close enough to have such an effect. The flower on the left appears to be at least on the same focal plain yet all of it is in clear focus, its all very confusing.

I think an even more effective composition would have been to just have the left and the right flower without anything else at all. I particularly like everything about these two flowers. On their own these two alone would have had much more impact, I love the viewpoint of both of them. The two in the middle spoil the overall effect.

Thank you for your submission, apologies for the delay in critique, Sid

Church with red door
by gmink

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

An appealing image that vaguely meets the challenge.

I feel a little undecided about this one whether I like it or not. There are elements of the composition I like, the shape of the red door with the ivy growing round it against the modern brick wall in front which I am not so keen on, I find the railings ugly and distracting. In fact, as it is, it only the shape of the door that gives a faint implication that this is a church at all, don't get me wrong, that is not a criticism, I quite like it for that.

I am wondering what a composition raised above the level of the railings including the roof which presumably has a cross or some sort of adornment would have looked like. I think in terms of the challenge, it would have come across much more clearly that it is a church. The red of the doors is very appealing and adds a lot to the image.

Apologies for the delay in this critique, thanks for your entry, Sid

Eglise du Dome Church at the Hotel des Invalides
by Ja-9

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

Congratulations on your ribbon for this appealing image that fulfils the challenge brief.

Its certainly a beautiful structure, not hard to imagine why it appears to have inspired so many in their subsequent designs, I would imagine it must be quite something to see at first hand. Its hard to conceive of the amount of effort that has gone into making something as awesome as this. This is the sort of image that cries out pure symmetry but I'm quite glad that you decided against that, I quite like the end result, though it does mean that we don't get to see enough of the two paintings on this side of the structure. If you had decided to go for total symmetry a square crop would have been a perfect option.

This would have been a difficult exposure but I think you made a good job of it, I can live with the overexposure of the windows in favour of sufficient light in the shadows without resorting to HDR. Anyway, you obviously did right for the voters here, well done Janine.

Let Us Go Into the House of the Lord....
by Catherine_B

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

A record shot that meets the challenge.

This is a straightforward documentary style image that records the existence of the building and little else really. Although the light on the end wall is nice you haven't made the best of the opportunity with the bulk of the image in fairly dull shade. I think moving your position a little further left to include all of the end wall and shadows without any cropping of the wall and cropping the right of the image to the downpipe and excluding it would have made for a better composition overall. This would have placed the 'tower' further to the right and improved the composition whilst making a feature of the end wall.

Like one of your commenters I am perplexed by the texture of the brickwork it just doesn't look natural at all, it can't be down to noise reduction given your low ISO perhaps that is the way it is. If that is so then it is even more reason to reduce its share of the image and concentrate on the end wall which is far more appealing with those lovely windows too. I have to say that the rest of the building by comparison is really quite boring.

Thanks for your submission and apologies for the delayed critique, as they say, 'better late than never', or at least I hope it is, Sid

Mary, Queen of the World Cathedral
by clickodak

Comment:
*Hello from Sid and the Critique Club*

An impressive image that meets the challenge fully.

This is certainly a very colourful image of an elaborately adorned location of worship that undoubtedly fulfils the challenge. For this sort of image to work at its very best it needs absolutely perfect symmetry and although you have got very close to that goal it is not quite there. You are just a fraction too far over to the right, although its very marginal it is noticeable to anyone who would look closely enough, but fortunately that is probably not the case for the majority of your viewers here. I can't quite be sure but there also feels a very slight tilt to the right.

You have done well to control the exposure the way you have, its good. I think your aperture is probably smaller than you actually needed, assuming you are at the 24mm end you would have a larger DOF anyway and I think you may have managed with f8, certainly f11 which have given you about 1s+ shutter speed which would have sharpened your moving person much better and made him less distracting. You do, of course, have plenty of scope with your ISO too which even at 400 would have eliminated any movement completely.

Nicely done, thanks for your submission and apologies for the delayed critique, as they say, 'better late than never', or at least I hope it is, Sid