King Arthur
by deemer

Comment:
Critique Club Time,

Welcome to DPC, Timothy.

Will not try to get too much into your very personal views on royalty and kingly attitudes and therefore will not bore you discussing the “conformity level” of your entry.
The space dedicated to your main subject, I think, is a tad incongruous. If the surrounding space would have been a valorizing and luxuriant setting for your monarch this would not be questionable but in this image the “negative space” dangerously flirts with non-existence. I would like to see more of this creature, feel the feather texture and the expression in his eye. Whether this was possible, at the time, or not, I don’t know.

Here is a rule of thumb of “classic” photography that proves to be useful most of the time: If the space surrounding you main subject is not adequately contextual to your message or intent, zoom in.

I wish you success for your next entries in the challenge.

JJ

Gracefully Insane- The rise and fall of America's premier mental hospital
by mighty_bison

Comment:
welcome to your first from the critique club,

MightyB, this was a good idea, and a good choice of location; decay and chaos are always inspiring subjects.
Composition wise the diagonal that separates the picture in two equal parts makes it a bit static to me.
Content wise, what I would expect to see in this kind of setting is to sense how the humanity related actually lived and suffered. Unfortunately you show us only vertical parts (where only things belong) that do not really hint us the past function of this recent ruin. A glimpse of what is inside one of these openings, a partial view of a courtyard or any relevant object (door handles, bars, bench etc. would add some strength to the photograph and help the viewers, more adequately, imagine a scene from this building’s past.

All the best, JJ

Body... Temple of the soul.
by cimarron98

Comment:
In my Critique Club incarnation.

Won’t go into technicalities here, you probably have gotten the idea from the previous comments left of what your co-challengers expect from you I this domainâ€Â¦
I support your decision not to aim for the obvious in this challenge. Although, from your picture, I can’t decide if this “body is a temple” concept is something you stand for or not. Most of you audience here was raised with the metaphysical concept that the body is a cumbersome incarnation that we are finally delivered from at death. If you are suggesting the contrary, your message should be more convincing. Even if your torso hints an image of the great Leonardo, the arid bluntness of it says to me: “the temple of the soul” sureâ€Â¦and what next? If this were your message, an oversaturated color version of this same pose would deliver the idea even better. On the other hand, if you were to illustrate your title more adequately, let yourself be inspired by some of the countless examples of artworks celebrating or transcending the human body in a variety of ways. I just went through some pictures on grigrigil's website that could be of inspiration.
Keep having good ideas. Just give a little more thought on how to defend them best.

All the best, JJ

Vase and flowers
by train

Comment:
Good Evening Live from the critique club:

Why did this classic, neatly composed and technically above average image get so little commentaries and just a mid-range score? I hope I can give you a few elements of response in that regard.
Re-visiting classics is a fine way to improve skills. But with such subjects, if you want to capture the attention of viewers, your presentation must be really outstanding. Your audience has seen this type of scene not only in photographic forms but in paintings, film and in everyday life so many times that the evaluation standards for this type of image will be rather high. Technically the main flaw I feel in your picture is that the emphasis seems to be given to the background and the vase rather than to the fine hibiscus branches. A more subtle and directional lighting on the plants with a darker background could have taken care of that. Reflecting props such as your vase are always tricky to work with if you use directional lights or flash (difficult to avoid these distracting pure white zones).
Another aspect of this photograph that I don’t feel good about is that there is no “story” attached to it as I see it. Just a vase with a flower in it, I am not learning much about you looking at it either.
If you were to include some unexpected element to the composition, this might stop the viewer, have him think about it, try to imagine how you came up with such an idea and, eventually make up his own story and keep him distracted from the minor flaws of your shot. I a very classic way, your “nostalgia” pic is one that tells a story for example. We should always try to tell a story. Facts (real or invented) are more interesting than things.
Good luck and don’t forget to surprise us,

JJ

St. Peter's at Dusk
by mbardeen

Comment:
Great timing! this shot would be practically be impossible to succeed at with no natural light at all. congrats for the blue!

Waiting For Letters Of Love
by GolferDDS

Comment:
Nice idea, could benefit from desaturation of the yellow

Saint Josaphat's Ukranian Catholic Church
by wdebeau1

Comment:
I think you could have zoomed a little closer towards the top of this spectacular building where the staight lines, curves and shades offer the most compositional options.

Place to Pray
by melongrind

Comment:
desaturating the yellows caused by of the artificial lighting and leveling the horizon would improve this otherwise fine view.

Idle Hands
by Pedro

Comment:
Glad to see someone is using imaging software in an adequate and creative way. miles ahead from the rest of the lot.

Frame by Frame
by e301

Comment:
Really nice study, I hope that some the 80some that voted this under par will take the time to read your comments.