DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Browse Settings
Currently viewing:
MemberAzrifel

Show comments:

Per page:

Order:

Comments:


Comments Made by Azrifel
Pages:   ... [212] [213] [214] [215] [216] [217] [218] ... [221]
Showing 2141 - 2150 of ~2207
Image Comment
Lunada Bay
01/15/2003 01:13:33 PM
Lunada Bay
by daysez

Comment:
The human element and the golden touch of the sun on the grass in the foreground, combined with the yellow and purplegrey of the clouds and the reflection in the water makes this a classic beauty. I don't know if they posed for this, but it is a good one. :)
I don't think that the white of the border was the right choice, but I don't look at frames anyway so that doesn't affect the score.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Too Much of a Good Thing!
01/15/2003 01:04:31 PM
Too Much of a Good Thing!
by Ptman

Comment:
~~~~Critique Club Comment~~~~

Composition (content)

Very good idea. At first sight I wondered how big the glass must be and how much beer it must have contained, but fortunately it is only a 50ml bottle. :)

The way the colors work here are great. From yellow to orange (beer), to orange-red (whiskey with a beer filter) to a similar yellow as the background on the letters of the JD bottle. Good choice of background, it balances out well and it doesn't ruin the color of the beer.

I think the handle would have done a better job in the compostion if it was at an angle so that you can look trough it. Doesn't have to be at 90 degrees of course, preferably less.

I would never ever have thought of the condensation on the glass that is missing, without your comment about the warm beer. Good thinking and I'll keep it in mind as well.

The position of the bottle in the glass is excellent, not head on, but slightly turned to the left. The pattern in the foot of the mug works well with it. The bubbles on the bottle and at the bottom have a very cool effect.

There is a bit of reflection on the glass. Could perhaps be taken away with a totally dark background behind the photographers back.

Background
As said, good choice, works well. The balance between the right and left is a bit off. Perhaps a reflector or less strong light from the right side could fill that (shadow) in. More important when you turn the handle more towards us, it will create a harder shadow.

Camera Work (Technical)
Good depth of focus, good focus, sharpness ok, exposure is excellent. Colours look very good.

Digital Processing (technical)
I don't think that the lower letters have sharpening artifacts, it is more bubbles that pass that part of the bottle. No futher comments.

My opinion
Very good, creative and well executed.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Head Up!
01/14/2003 05:01:47 PM
Head Up!
by Remie

Comment:
Nice compostion and background.
Good idea.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Forbidden Snack
01/14/2003 04:59:49 PM
Forbidden Snack
by amonteforte

Comment:
All kind of dirty jokes as a comment come to mind.
Good job and I will keep the jokes to myself. :)
Photographer found comment helpful.
Un-Forbidden Fruit
01/14/2003 04:58:15 PM
Un-Forbidden Fruit1st Place
by autool

Comment:
ROFL, very original!
Nice natural colors as well.
Background is a bit dirty.
Photographer found comment helpful.
When was the last time you watered the plants, dear?
01/14/2003 04:56:38 PM
When was the last time you watered the plants, dear?2nd Place
by jjbeguin

Comment:
Nice idea!
I like the composition, altough I think that a more horizontal angle would have a better effect on the table. Adding the bowl of (?)nuts(?) makes the scene more interesting.
One thing tough, the scene looks underexposed. The wine is shifting to black, the greens are rather dark, the shadows hold little detail and the white wall doesn't look white. Not because the whitebalance isn't right, its more an underexposure thing. However, the exposure of some of the 'nuts' is very good, and some of the flowers are well exposed too. (This monitor is calibrated)
I think that this picture can benefit from two possibilities:
1) More light from beneath to fill in the shadows, plus perhaps another light on the wall.
2) Exposure compensation / exposure bracketing

I might tell you something you already know; The white wall fools the camera's exposure meter, just like snow. It measures something to bright for its reference of 18% grey and chooses an exposure setting that compensates in the other direction. But that leads to underexposure of the scene. I think that this scene could benefit from a 1/3th to 2/3th wider aperture or the equivalent of shutterspeed for that (1 stop wider aperture is equal to a doubling of the shutter open time). So when you don't wan't to mess with the depth of field, you need a longer shutter.

Good sharpness, focus and depth. Colors look very natural (altough dark), so the whitebalance seems ot be good.

Anyway, I like this pic and there is one of the better humour shots, so I gave it a 9. Would be a 10 if it weren't for the things I told above.

(I was still in Critique Club mode, so that's why I got carried away with this reply)
Photographer found comment helpful.
Reflecting in Rain -- Purple Rain_Prince
01/14/2003 04:40:01 PM
Reflecting in Rain -- Purple Rain_Prince
by smellyfish1002

Comment:
~~~~Critique Club Comment~~~~

Composition (content)

Nice composition, I like it how the light works here, it leads the attention to the face. The raindrops add a good texture, they look nice in this state. Raindrops running down the window, wouldn't have been nice at this shutter.
The face makes the picture, it is an interesting element, portrayed in an original way. The purple edges in every drop is also very nice.
Was the window dirty? In the face area there are some strange stripes / smears, it is a little bit distracting as it is an unnatural element in this composition.
The exposure must have been difficult. You still have a dark right side, while the left side of the face starts to blow out. Was it lit from the left, it looks that way. Perhaps that changing the position could help bring a more even lighting if you want to. It is not a big deal.

Background
No comment.

Camera Work (Technical)
Can't judge. Because it is so dark I can't see if this is really sharp. It isn't so important here I think. The blurred background face is ok, the soft look goes well with purple rain.

Digital Processing (technical)
You have done a lot of work to get it this way, interesting to read how you did it. I can't add anything else to it.

My opinion
Interesting concept, good idea.
I'd like it more without the stripes in the face area.
Photographer found comment helpful.
karmacoma
01/14/2003 01:49:44 PM
karmacoma
by stephan

Comment:
~~~~Critique Club Comment~~~~

Composition (content)

Arghh, this must be the most difficult picture to comment on in my whole CC career. :)

I tried to capture the mood and create a visual representation of what I think fits to the song.
I know the song, but I don't like it (music, never listened to the lyrics) to put it mildly. This image puzzles me, I don't know what I am seeing. I wan't to, but I can't. Perhaps that is a little frustrating. The mood it expresses to me is a dark and depressed one.

I have looked up the lyrics. They seem to be a bit dark and puzzled as well, so I guess you have done a good job.
..duplicate, then you wait for the next kuwait....
..i drink on a daily basis
though it seldom cools my temper
it never cools my temper....


Interesting. When it comes to drinking by the way, that could be reflected in the strange curvy flow in the top. Like the world distortions you see when you are drunk, just before you fall on the floor with the world spinning very very very hard. (I succesfully avoid that the last couple of years).

The thing that I most like about the picture itself (without the feeling it expresses) is the color and arrangement of the yellow/green texture.
The figure seems to have the profile of a teddybear. My first thought about the green stuff was a green lit LP, but it has got to many tracks.

This is something that works for you and then it is great, or it doesn't and then it means nothing to you.

Background
No comment.

Camera Work (Technical)
Was there away to avoid that spot in the yellow, left of the figure?

Digital Processing (technical)
No comment.

My opinion
I don't really know what too think of it.
Photographer found comment helpful.
"Slither"  - Metallica
01/13/2003 05:43:27 PM
"Slither" - Metallica
by Yomi

Comment:
~~~~Critique Club Comment~~~~

Composition (content)

The postion of the snake in this composition is very good. Two of its most known features, the head an the rattler (I think it is, the head looks to be of one and the tail suggest it, but I am no expert on them) are captured in the frame at composition-wise nice positions.
The bit of body at the left suggests the size, it must be pretty big and that enhances the feeling that this is a dangerous creature. The head is in a nice position, the animal seems to be checking the viewer out. Too bad there is a reflection in the eye, a clear pupil is more powerful.
Don't know what to make of the branch. I don't think it interferes much, it tells something about the habitat. Perhaps it would have been better if there was more of it.
Nice angle, puts you face to face.

Background
The color of the background goes well with the snake. It could be lying on a rock, it doesn't say "Zoo", nice effect. The pieces in front of the face add some flavour and another color (good).

Camera Work (Technical)
I think that this picture would have benefitted from a smaller aperture in combination with a focus that would allow for more depth of field in front of the snake. The blur in the background is good, but it would have been nice to have the rattler in the field of focus as it is an important feature of the snake. Only 1/3th of the DOF is in front of the focus point and 2/3th behind it, so it would need to be focussed well in front off the face. The tail perhaps.
As it is, the focus is good and the sharpness excellent.
Good exposure as well.

Digital Processing (technical)
Color balance, sharpness etc are all ok.
You have room to save it at a higher quality level. The benefit of that is that you keep a higher sharpness of the details. No obvious jpeg degradation here, but it is something to keep in mind. No reason not to save high quality work at the highest quality.

My opinion
Nice image. I like the power of the snake, but it could use more depth in the front in my opinion to make it better. I don't understand the high number of three's and two's.
Photographer found comment helpful.
'Blue Skies' by Tori Amos
01/13/2003 05:14:56 PM
'Blue Skies' by Tori Amos
by Manic

Comment:
~~~~Critique Club Comment~~~~

Composition (content)

If it wasn't for the challenge and the title I'd say that there is bit much of empty space above the silhouette. For a silhouette it is a nice image, the composition of it is pleasant and the different types of tree provide different textures to prevent a boring view. The small resolution took away some of the detail. :(
In this case (talking about the blue sky as the main subject now), the silhouette adds something interesting, nice and well done. I also like the color graduation behind the trees, be it on the soft side.
Nice border.

Background
See composition.

Camera Work (Technical)
The exposure that resulted from the camera work and post processing is good. The silhouette is completely dark.
The blue sky shifts from whiteblue in the left to a darker blue in the upper right. Was it taken with a polarizer on, it is something you often see with polarizers used at a less perfect angle to the sun. The polarizer might make the sky blue'er when you haven't used it. I believe the S40 has possibilities for that..

Digital Processing (technical)
Good job. Very clean sky.

My opinion
As it is, too empty, but met the challenge well.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Pages:   ... [212] [213] [214] [215] [216] [217] [218] ... [221]
Showing 2141 - 2150 of ~2207


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/04/2025 01:55:51 PM EDT.