I'm going through the entries, stopping at those images I feel have had the benefit of an unconventional eye and dwelling a little longer to try to see and appreciate what you saw. This is one of those images.
Positives: Your narrow depth of field captures the layered nature of what lies before us and choice of offering this as a flat grey communicates a certain austerity. You have restricted the frame to such a degree that with aren't offered any reference points and this confounds our ability to attribute scale to what we are seeing - I like that ambiguity.
Critical stuff: None of the above is really enough to develop any great degree of interest in the image - I can respect what you have done but the elements don't conspire to offer up enough to make me care about the image. It doesn't make me get involved as a viewer.
Overall: I see what you have gone for but in the final analysis it isn't pushing my buttons. Apologies.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
