Critique Club Critique
I remember this one during voting. I liked the potential and the scene, I voted this a 6.
Photograph Information, Technicals & Composition Review
With an exposure of 1/25, I can see how the light would be overexposed in the windows, but you likely had the dilemma of poor lighting within the building. Maybe a deeper dof may have helped there, although having said that, the windows 'bright' do kind of add to the image - but I think it might be more interesting with some color there. Maybe a filter... not sure.
Composition wise: the tilt is unsettling but it looks like there may not have been much to work with to straighten - however perhaps a perspective correction may have been usable. the main dome at the top of the image is unbalanced and there are the tops of the columns poking in at the top of frame. One of those columns is missing and, while that is an interesting element of itself (and I did ponder it during voting), I think it is a detraction rather than an added element of interest, with the way the image is composed as is.
It is a fairly decent capture of the artwork and architecture, but it is seemingly all about the ceiling, but that is 'tilted' from the angle/perspective.
Comments, Score & Placement Review
300/419 is fairly low down the pack, although your score of 5.33 is not bad for a Free Study.
All of your comments are helpful and many provide some good honest feedback.
Good scene, variation in composition - possibly even with a really bold crop, if the quality was there, likely have produced a more interesting study into the interesting architecture.