DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Multiple, more than 1
Multiple, more than 1
Pixelprose


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Multiple Light Sources (Basic Editing I)
Camera: Olympus C-3000Z
Location: home
Date: May 25, 2004
Aperture: 1:2.8
ISO: auto
Shutter: 1/10
Galleries: Black and White
Date Uploaded: May 25, 2004

I learned a little about lighting on this challenge, I had my choice of a 500w quartz or 2 mag hand flashlights. Flashlights worked better.
Crop and saturation used.

Statistics
Place: 101 out of 221
Avg (all users): 5.0888
Avg (commenters): 6.5000
Avg (participants): 4.9255
Avg (non-participants): 5.1818
Views since voting: 716
Votes: 259
Comments: 8
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
06/21/2004 01:52:31 PM
The lighting is tremendous. I suppose people whose monitors aren't properly calibrated didn't get the entire shot. Well done.
06/02/2004 12:48:17 AM
i also really like your photo. i like to go back and make a comment on the photos i scored a ten but didnt do so well to let the photographers know that someone actually got and really liked their shot. this was just so simple it was great.
06/02/2004 12:42:32 AM
You have the satisfaction of an image well done. Wish your score had reflected the very nice work you did.
 Comments Made During the Challenge
06/01/2004 07:47:02 PM
This simple, yet mysterious image is beautifully done. Fun to look at and must ave been a bit difficult to achieve. Hope you tell us in your photographer's notes. 9
  Photographer found comment helpful.
06/01/2004 01:07:47 PM
muy interesante...
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/26/2004 11:15:37 PM
nice contrast but too dark, and only one light source!
05/26/2004 11:38:47 AM
This probably won't do well, but I really like this photo. It's very simple, but mysterious at the same time. The two light sources are obvious, even if one of them is out of the frame, and it creates a nice effect. 7
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/26/2004 05:52:08 AM
Why so small!? It may be just that I've seen three or four shots in a row that haven't used the available size by a distance, but surely this would have been more effective at 640xsomething? There's nearly 200 pixels of height you haven't used here ... whyever not? It's tha more annoying, because this could be wonderful - really wonderful: the effect of the lampshade on the things own stand, and the effect of that little cross-light on the shade itself could have brought out more, perhaps. You could have found that great range of tonality that black and white can really do, but that only really shows in the details, and the detail disappear in the sizing. 6
  Photographer found comment helpful.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/16/2024 12:51:04 PM EDT.